Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:12:11.878Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Processing of Carbon Nanotube Reinforced Aluminum Composite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

T. Kuzumaki
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 7–3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113–8656, Japan
K. Miyazawa
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 7–3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113–8656, Japan
H. Ichinose
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 7–3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113–8656, Japan
K. Ito
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 7–3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113–8656, Japan
Get access

Abstract

Carbon nanotube reinforced aluminum (Al) composites were produced by hot-press and hot-extrusion methods. The interfacial structure between the carbon nanotube and Al was examined using a transmission electron microscope (TEM), and the mechanical properties were measured by a tensile test. TEM observations have shown that the nanotubes in the composites are not damaged during the composite preparation and that no reaction products at the nanotube/Al interface are visible after annealing for 24 h at 983 K. The strength of the composites is only slightly affected by the annealing time at 873 K, while that of the pure Al produced in a similar powder metallurgy process significantly decreases with time. These studies are considered to yield experimental information valuable for producing high performance composites.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Overney, G., Zhong, W., and Tomanek, D., Z. Phys. D 27, 93 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Tracy, M. M. J., Ebbesen, T. W., and Gibson, J. M., Nature (London) 381, 678 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Wong, E. W., Sheehan, P. E., and Gibson, C. M., Science 277, 1971 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Ishida, Y., Hayashi, T., Ichinose, H., Kuzumaki, T., and Ito, K., ICEM 13, Les editions de physicque Proc., Paris, 1994, p. 9.Google Scholar
5.Ruoff, R. S., Lorents, D. C., Laduca, R., Awadalla, S., Weathersby, S., Parvin, K., and Subramoney, S., Program Bienn Conf. Carbon, Extended Abstr. 22, 1995, p. 350.Google Scholar
6.Kuzumaki, T., Hayashi, T., Ichinose, H., Miyazawa, K., Ito, K., and Ishida, Y., J. Jpn. Instr. Metals 61, 9 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Kuzumaki, T., Hayashi, T., Ichinose, H., Miyazawa, K., Ito, K., and Ishida, Y., Philos. Mag. A (in press).Google Scholar
8.Ishida, Y., Ichinose, H., Wang, J., and Suga, T., 46th Annu. Met. Electr. Micros. Soc. of America. Proc., edited by Bailey, G. W., San Francisco, 1988, p. 728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Kuzumaki, T., Hayashi, T., Ichinose, H., Miyazawa, K., Ito, K., and Ishida, Y., J. Jpn. Inst. Metals 61, 319 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Abrahamson, J., Carbon 11, 337 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Henning, G. R., Proc. 5th Conf. on Carbon (Pergmon, Oxford, England, 1961), Vol. I, p. 301.Google Scholar
12.Kelly, A. and Tyson, W. R., Brit. J. Appl. Phys., 16 (1965).Google Scholar