Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T22:41:46.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Processing and mechanical behavior of SiC fiber-reinforced Si3N4 composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

J-M. Yang ,
Steven T.J. Chen ,
S.M. Jeng ,
R.B. Thayer  and
J-F. LeCoustaouec
J-M. Yang
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90024-1595
Steven T.J. Chen
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90024-1595
S.M. Jeng
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90024-1595
R.B. Thayer
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90024-1595
J-F. LeCoustaouec
Affiliation:
Textron Specialty Materials, Lowell, Massachusetts 02851
Get access

Abstract

The interfacial properties and mechanical behavior of the SCS-6/Si3N4 composites fabricated by hot pressing from powder lay-up and tape lay-up techniques were studied. Interfacial shear strength and frictional stress were measured using an indentation test. Fracture toughness and work-of-fracture were measured using a three-point bending test on a chevron-notched specimen. The influence of interfacial shear strength on the toughening mechanisms and crack propagation behavior were investigated. The results indicate that the processing routes and fiber orientation will affect the interfacial properties, which in turn have a significant influence on mechanical properties.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 6 , Issue 9 , September 1991 , pp. 1926 - 1936
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Lindley, M. W.and Godfrey, D. J., Nature 229, 192–193 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Shetty, D. K., Pascucci, M. R., Mutsudy, B. C., and Wills, R. R., Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc. 6 (7–8), 632–645 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Kodama, H., Sakamoto, H., and Miyoshi, T., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 72 (4), 551–558 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Bhatt, R. T.and Phillips, R. E., J. Comp. Technol. Res. 12 (1), 13 (1990).Google Scholar
5.Bhatt, R. T., NASA TM-87055, 1985.Google Scholar
6.Evans, A. G. and Marshall, D. B., Acta Metall. 37 (10), 2567–2583 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Marshall, D. B., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 67 (12), C–259 (1984).Google Scholar
8.Kerans, R. J., Hay, R. S., Pagano, J., and Parthasarathy, T. A., Ceram. Bull. 68 (2), 429 (1989).Google Scholar
9.Laughner, J. W., Shaw, N. J., Bhatt, R. T., and Dicarlo, J., Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc. 7 (7–8), 932 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Yang, C. J., Jeng, S. M., and Yang, J-M., Scripta Metall. 24 (3), 469 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Broek, D., Elementary Engineering Fracture Mechanics (Martinus Nijhoff Publ., The Hague, 1982), p. 85.Google Scholar
12.Morscher, G., Pirouz, P., and Heuer, A. H., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73 (3), 713–720 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Bright, J. D., Shetty, D. K., Griffin, C. W., and Limaye, S. V., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 72 (10), 1891 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Marshall, D. B. and Evans, A. G., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 68 (5), 225–231 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar