Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T02:09:39.527Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prediction of the contact time through modeling of heat transfer and fluid flow in compound casting process of Al/Mg light metals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2017

Morteza Morakabian Esfahani
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz 61357-83151, Iran
Esmaeil Hajjari*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz 61357-83151, Iran
Ali Farzadi
Affiliation:
Department of Mining and Metallurgical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran 15875-1774, Iran
Seyed Reza Alavi Zaree
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz 61357-83151, Iran
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

In this study, the time that molten magnesium is in contact with the aluminum insert before solidification was predicted by solving the conservation equations of mass, momentum, and energy during compound casting of dissimilar Al/Mg couples. For this purpose, a three-dimensional transient model and FLOW-3D software were utilized and distributions of temperature and velocity vectors in the fluid over time were obtained. Then, the contact time at the bottom, middle, and top of aluminum insert in its interface with the magnesium melt was calculated. The results of simulation show that the contact time decreases from about 1.7 s at bottom to 1.6 s at middle and 0.8 s at top of the interface, respectively. This is consistent with the experimental metallographic observations which indicate a decrease in the thickness of formed intermetallic compounds from bottom to middle and top of the Al/Mg interface.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Contributing Editor: Jürgen Eckert

References

REFERENCES

Papis, K.J.M., Hallstedt, B., Loffler, J.F., and Uggowitzer, P.J.: Interface formation in aluminium–aluminium compound casting. Acta Mater. 56, 3036 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horikawa, N., Ito, T., Noguchi, T., and Nakamura, T.: Size effect in cast-in insertion process. Int. J. Cast Met. Res. 16, 365 (2003).Google Scholar
Ho, J.S., Lin, C.B., and Liu, C.H.: Effect of continuous cooling heat treatment on interface characteristics of S45C/copper compound casting. J. Mater. Sci. 39, 2473 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choe, K.H., Park, K.S., Kang, B.H., Cho, G.S., Kim, K.Y., Lee, K.W., Kim, M.H., Ikenaga, A., and Koroyasu, S.: Study of the interface between steel insert and aluminum casting in EPC. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 24, 60 (2008).Google Scholar
Papis, K.J.M., Loffler, J.F., and Uggowitzer, P.J.: Interface formation between liquid and solid Mg alloys—An approach to continuously metallurgic joining of magnesium parts. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 527, 2274 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Divandari, M. and Vahid Golpayegani, A.R.: Study of Al/Cu rich phases formed in A356 alloy by inserting Cu wire in pattern in LFC process. Mater. Des. 30, 3279 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiong, B., Cai, C., and Lu, B.: Effect of volume ratio of liquid to solid on the interfacial microstructure and mechanical properties of high chromium cast iron and medium carbon steel bimetal. J. Alloys Compd. 509, 6700 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dezellus, O., Milani, L., Bosselet, F., Sacerdote-Peronnet, M., Roubyb, D., and Viala, J.C.: Mechanical testing of titanium/aluminium–silicon interfaces by push-out. J. Mater. Sci. 43, 1749 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volder, J.P.: An overview of a number of casting processes. Aluminum 4, 11 (1993).Google Scholar
Emami, S.M., Divandari, M., Arabi, H., and Hajjari, E.: Effect of melt-to-solid insert volume ratio on Mg/Al dissimilar metals bonding. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 22, 123 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noguchi, T., Horikawa, N., Nagate, H., Nakamura, T., and Sato, K.: Application of flow and solidification simulation in cast-in insertion processing. Int. J. Cast Met. Res. 18, 214 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guangchen, X., Alan, A.L., Yiqing, C., and Anil, K.S.: Interfacial phenomena in magnesium/aluminum bi-metallic castings. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 595, 154 (2014).Google Scholar
Papis, K.J.M., Loeffler, J.F., and Uggowitzwr, P.J.: Light metal compound casting. Sci. China, Ser. E: Technol. Sci. 52, 46 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajjari, E., Divandari, M., Razavi, S.H., Emami, S.M., Homma, T., and Kamado, S.: Dissimilar joining of Al/Mg light metals by compound casting process. J. Mater. Sci. 46, 6491 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajjari, E., Divandari, M., Razavi, S.H., Homma, T., and Kamado, S.: Microstructure characteristics and mechanical properties of Al 413/Mg joint in compound casting process. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 43, 4667 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, M.H., Lim, Y.C., and Farson, D.F.: Simulation of weld pool dynamics in the stationary pulsed gas metal arc welding process and final weld shape. Weld. J. 85, 271 (2006).Google Scholar
Cao, Z., Yang, Z., and Chen, X.L.: Three-dimensional simulation of transient GMA weld pool with free surface. Weld. J. 85, 169 (2004).Google Scholar
Flow-3D Database, Ver.10.0, www.flow3d.com, December 2016.Google Scholar
Farzadi, A., Serajzadeh, S., and Kokabi, A.H.: Investigation of weld pool in aluminium alloys: Geometry and solidification microstructure. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 49, 809 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajjari, E., Divandari, M., Razavi, S.H., Emami, S.M., and Kamado, S.: Estimation of the transient interfacial heat flux between substrate/melt at the initiation of magnesium solidification on aluminum substrates using the lumped capacitance method. Appl. Surf. Sci. 257, 5077 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar