Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dtkg6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T03:07:25.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Photoelastic and finite element analysis of different size spheres in contact

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

C.W. Shih ,
W.S. Schlein  and
J.C.M. Li
C.W. Shih
Affiliation:
Materials Science Program, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627
W.S. Schlein
Affiliation:
Materials Science Program, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627
J.C.M. Li
Affiliation:
Materials Science Program, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627
Get access

Abstract

The photoelastic stress-freezing technique is applied to observe the stress distribution inside two spheres of different sizes compressed together elastically. After the stress is frozen in, thin slices of the material containing the symmetry axis are prepared for observation through a polariscope. The stress distribution is compared with both the finite element numerical analysis and the Hertz analytical theory which is limited to small deformations. Among the three, the agreement between the experimental results and the finite element analysis is the best. The deviation from the Hertz theory is less in the larger sphere contacting a smaller one than in the smaller sphere contacting a larger one.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , April 1992 , pp. 1011 - 1017
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Hertz, H., Miscellaneous Papers, trans, by Jones, D.E. (The MacMillan Co., New York, 1896).Google Scholar
2.Shih, C. W., Yang, M., and Li, J. C. M., J. Mater. Res. 6, 2623–2628 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Sin, H-C., Saka, N., and Suh, N.P., Wear 55, 163–190 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Dally, J.D. and Chen, Y.M., Exp. Mech. June, 144–149 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Artz, E., Ashby, M. F., and Eastering, K.E., Metall. Trans. A 14A, 211–221 (1983).Google Scholar
6.Li, E.K.H. and Funkenbusch, P.D., Acta Metall. 37, 1645–1655 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Kuske, A. and Robertson, G., Photoelastic Stress Analysis (John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 1974).Google Scholar
8.Drucker, D.C. and Woodward, W.B., J. Appl. Phys. 25, 510–512 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Chu, S.N.G. and Li, J. C. M., J. Appl. Phys. 51, 3338–3342 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Paipetis, S. A., in Photoelasticity in Engineering Practice, edited by Paipetis, S. A. and Holister, G. S. (Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, 1985), pp. 205–224.Google Scholar
11. Vishay Measurements Group, “Photostress Instrumentation”, Bulletin S-134, S-116-E (1983).Google Scholar
12. ABAQUS User's Manual, Version 4.8 (Hibbitt, Karlsson and Sorenson, Inc., Providence, RI, 1989).Google Scholar
13.Johnson, K. L., Contact Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar