Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T01:41:28.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Photoconductivity of carbon aerogels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

M. Hosoya
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
G. Reynolds
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
M.S. Dresselhaus
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
R.W. Pekala
Affiliation:
Chemistry and Materials Science Department, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Photoconductivity was measured on a series of carbon aerogels to investigate their electronic properties. Carbon aerogels are a special class of low-density microcellular foams, consisting of interconnected carbon particles (∼120 Å diameter) and narrow graphitic ribbons (∼25 Å width) intertwined within each particle. Both the dark- and photoconductivities show drastic changes in the temperature range 5–300 K, which are similar to those in a-Si and chalcogenide photoconductors. At high temperatures, the photoconductivity is dominated by the carrier recombination within each particle. The photoconductivity at low temperatures is dominated by the same carrier transport mechanism as that for the dark conductivity, which is based on hopping and tunneling transport. The activation energy values for transport and recombination identify the electronic structure of the particles among samples of different bulk density. The long decay time of the photoconductivity suggests a relaxation mechanism associated with the dangling bonds.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

References

REFERENCES

1Steinbeck, J., Braunstein, G., Dresselhaus, M.S., Dresselhaus, G., and Venkatesan, T., in Extended Abstracts No. 8 (Graphite Intercalation Compounds), edited by Dresselhaus, M.S., Dres-selhaus, G., and Solin, S. A. (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1986), p. 129.Google Scholar
2MacFarlane, J. M., McLintock, I. S., and Orr, J.C., Phys. Status Solidi A 3, K239 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3McMichael, B. D., Kmetko, E.A., and Mrozowski, S., J. Opt. Soc. Am. 44, 26 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Kuriyama, K. and Dresselhaus, M. S., J. Mater. Res. 6, 1040 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Kuriyama, K. and Dresselhaus, M.S., Phys. Rev. B 44, 8256 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Pekala, R.W. and Kong, F.M., Polym. Prpts. 30, 221 (1989).Google Scholar
7Pekala, R.W. and Kong, F.M., J. Phys. (Paris) Coll. Suppl. 50, C433 (1989).Google Scholar
8Pekala, R.W. and Alviso, C.T., in Novel Forms of Carbon, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. (1992, in press).Google Scholar
9Pekala, R. W., J. Mater. Sci. 24, 3221 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Pekala, R. W., Alviso, C. T., and LeMay, J. D., in Chemical Processing of Advanced Materials, edited by Hench, L. L. and West, J. K. (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1992), pp. 671683.Google Scholar
11Pekala, R.W., Alviso, C.T., Kong, F.M., and Hulsey, S.S., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 145, 90 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Fung, A.W.P., Wang, Z.H., Lu, K., Dresselhaus, M.S., and Pekala, R.W., unpublished work.Google Scholar
13Sheng, P., Sichel, E. K., and Gittleman, J. I., Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 1197 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Mort, J. and Pai, D. M., Photoconductivity and Related Phenomena (Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1976), pp. 195, 241.Google Scholar
15Spear, W. E., Loveland, R.J., and Al-Sharbaty, A., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 15, 410 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Arnoldussen, T. C., Menezes, C. A., Nakagawa, Y., and Bube, R. H., Phys. Rev. B 9, 3377 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Lang, D.V. and Logan, R. A., Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 635 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Lang, D.V., Logan, R.A., and Jaros, M., Phys. Rev. B 19, 1015 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Agarwal, S. C. and Guha, S., Phys. Rev. B 31, 5547 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Kakalios, J. and Fritzsche, H., Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1602 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Bube, R.H., Photoconductivity of Solids (John Wiley, New York, 1960).Google Scholar
22Brodsky, M. H., Amorphous Semiconductors (Springer-Verlag, 1985), p. 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23Rose, A., Concepts in Photoconductivity and Allied Problems (Interscience Publishers, New York, 1963).Google Scholar
24Stockmann, F., in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Photoconductivity (Pergamon Press, New York, 1971), p. 17.Google Scholar