Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:37:02.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phase selection in electrohydrodynamic atomization of alumina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

C. G. Levi ,
V. Jayaram ,
J. J. Valencia  and
R. Mehrabian
C. G. Levi
Affiliation:
Materials Department and Department of Mechanical and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106
V. Jayaram
Affiliation:
Materials Department and Department of Mechanical and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106
J. J. Valencia
Affiliation:
Materials Department and Department of Mechanical and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106
R. Mehrabian
Affiliation:
Materials Department and Department of Mechanical and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106
Get access

Abstract

Electrohydrodynamic atomization'has been adapted to produce Al2O3 powders ranging in size from 10 nm to 300 μm. Microstructural characterization using x-ray diffraction, scanning, and transmission electron microscopy reveals changes in phase selection as a function of particle size, hence supercooling. Amorphous powders are common below 100 nm in diameter. Cubic spinel γ is found in single phase form between 100 nm and 2μm, and partially transformed to δ between 2 and 20 μm. There is also evidence of σ and θ or a precursor of θ forming directly from the liquid above 5 μm. The stable corundum structure is consistently found above 20 μm but exhibits three different morphologies: faceted, dendritic, and cellular. Phase selection is examined on the basis of fundamental thermodynamic and kinetic considerations and results from computer models predicting the thermal history of the powders. It is concluded that metastable phases require the elimination of catalytic sites for the nucleation of a and are thus more likely to form in the smaller powders. Furthermore, submicron powders achieve sufficiently high cooling rates to preserve the metastable phases formed (γ), but those higher than ∼ 1 μm experience a thermal excursion long enough to transform γ to more stable forms of Al2O3.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 3 , Issue 5 , October 1988 , pp. 969 - 983
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Levi, C. G. and Mehrabian, R., Metall. Trans. A 13, 221 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Levi, C. G. and Mehrabian, R., in Undercooled Alloy Phases, edited by Collings, E. W. and Koch, C. C. (The Metallurgical Society, Warrendale, PA, 1987), pp. 345–374.Google Scholar
3Brockway, M. C. and Wills, R. R., “Rapid Solidification of Ceramics, A Technology Assessment,” Metals and Ceramics Information Center Report MCIC-84-49 (1984).Google Scholar
4Kronberg, M. L., Acta Metall. 5, 507 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Lippens, B. C. and Boer, J. H. de, Acta Cryst. 17, 1312 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Wafers, K. and Bell, G. M., Oxides and Hydroxides of Aluminum, Technical Paper No. 19 (Alcoa Research Laboratories, Alcoa Center, PA, 1972).Google Scholar
7Ervin, G., Acta Cryst. 5, 103 (1952).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Saalfeld, H., Clay Min. Bull. 3, 249 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Brindley, G. W. and Choe, J. O., J. Min. Soc. Am. 46(7/8), 771 (1961).Google Scholar
10Yamaguchi, G., Yasui, I., and Chiu, W., Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 43, 2478 (1970).Google Scholar
11Lejus, A. M., Rev. Int. Hautes Temp. Refract. 1, 53 (1964).Google Scholar
12Rooksby, H. P. and Rooymans, C. J. M., Clay Min. Bull. 4, 234 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Jayaram, V. and Levi, C. G., “The Structure of δ-Alumina Evolved from the Melt and the γ←δ Transformation,” submitted to Acta Metall.Google Scholar
14Geller, S., J. Chem. Phys. 33(3), 676 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Ault, N. N., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 40(3), 69 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Plummer, M., J. Appl. Chem. 8, 35 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Das, A. R. and Fulrath, R. M., in Reactivity of Solids, edited by Schwab, G. M. (Elsevier, New York, 1965), pp. 31–44.Google Scholar
18McPherson, R., J. Mater. Sci. 8, 851 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Wilms, V. and Herman, H., Thin Solid Films 39, 251 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Hurley, G. F. and Gac, F. D., Ceram. Bull. 58, 509 (1979).Google Scholar
21McPherson, R., J. Mater. Sci. 15, 3141 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Fargeot, D., Lortholary, P., and Dauger, A., in Ceramic Powders, edited by Vincenzini, P. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1983), pp. 977–985.Google Scholar
23Dauger, A., Fargeot, D., and Laval, J. P., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 21, 207 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Matthiesen, D. H. and Petuskey, W. T., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 68(5), C114 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25Topol, L. E., Hengstenberg, D. H., and Blander, M., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 12, 377 (1973).Google Scholar
26Herman, H., “Properties of Materials Quenched from the Liquid State,” Final Report AR08571. 11-MC (1977).Google Scholar
27Jantzen, C. M., Krepski, R. P., and Herman, H., Mater. Res. Bull. 15, 1313 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28Dragoo, A. L. and Diamond, J. J., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 50(11), 568 (1967).Google Scholar
29Goranchev, B. and Orlinov, V., Thin Solid Films 70, 111 (1980).Google Scholar
30Roy, D. M., Roy, R., and O'Holleran, T. P., “Innovative Technology for Fabrication of Ceramics: EDS Rapid Solidification Process Application to Specialized Materials,” Final Report Bureau of Mines OFR66-81, 53 (1980).Google Scholar
31Levi, C. G. and Mehrabian, R., Metall. Trans. A 13, 13 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32Shechtman, D., Ridder, S. D., and Mehrabian, R., in Rapid Solidification Processing, Principles and Technologies III, edited by Mehrabian, R. (National Bureau of Standards, Gaithersburg, MD, 1983), pp. 96–104.Google Scholar
33Salas, O. and Levi, C. G., “Solute Redistribution and Interfacial Stability in Ultrafine Al-Fe-Ce powders,” accepted for publication in Int. J. Rapid Solidification.Google Scholar
34Kaufman, M. J. and Fraser, H. L., Int. J. Rapid Solidification 1, 27 (1984-1985).Google Scholar
35Mahoney, J. F., Taylor, S., and Perel, J., in Proceedings of the 1984 IEEE/IAS Annual Conference, Session on Electrostatic Processes (IEEE, Chicago, IL, 1984).Google Scholar
36Kingery, W. D., Bowen, H. K., and Uhlmann, D. R., Introduction to Ceramics (Wiley, New York, 1976), 2nd ed., p. 905.Google Scholar
37Levi, C. G., Valencia, J. J., and Mehrabian, R., in Processing of Structural Metals by Rapid Solidification, edited by Froes, F. H. and S. Savage, J. (ASM International, Metals Park, OH, 1987), pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
38JANAF Thermochemical Tables, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 14, Suppl. 1, 156 (1985).Google Scholar
39Flemings, M. C., Solidification Processing (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1970), Chap. 9.Google Scholar
40Christian, J. W., The Theory of Transformations in Metals and Alloys, (Pergamon, Oxford, 1975), 2nd ed., P. I, Chap. 10.Google Scholar
41Levi, C. G., Metall. Trans. A 19, 699 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42Skapski, A. S., Acta Met. 4, 576 (1956).Google Scholar
43Kingery, W. D., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 37(2), 42 (1954).Google Scholar
44Steiner, C. J. P., Hasselman, D. H. P., and Spriggs, R. M., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 54(8), 412 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
45Turnbull, D., in Ref. 2, pp. 3–22.Google Scholar
46Perepezko, H. J., Mueller, B. A., and Ohsaka, K., in Ref. 2, pp. 289–320.Google Scholar