Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:12:59.736Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Phase Evolution of Turbostratic Boron Nitride During the Deposition of Cubic Boron Nitride Film

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Hong-Suk Kim
Affiliation:
Thin Film Technology Research Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 131, Cheongyang, 130–650, Seoul, Korea, andDepartment of Materials Science, Korea University, Anam5-ga, 136–720, Seoul, Korea
In-Hoon Choi
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, Korea University, Anam5-ga, 136–720, Seoul, Korea
Young-Joon Baik
Affiliation:
Thin Film Technology Research Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 131, Cheongyang, 130–650, Seoul, Korea
Get access

Extract

The formation of turbostratic boron nitride (tBN) phase on the cubic boron nitride (cBN) phase was investigated at specific conditions. The cBN film was deposited on the Si substrate by unbalanced magnetron sputtering. When the bias voltage at the substrate was adjusted to –85 V, the tBN phase nucleated on the cBN phase and grew simultaneously with the cBN phase. This was a critical bias voltage below which only the tBN phase was formed. The surface morphology of this film was typically shown as nodules dispersed on a very flat surface. The formation of nodulelike tBN phases seemed to be caused by a small variation of local stress on the growth surface. Once the nucleation of the nodulelike tBN phase occurred, the growth of tBN phase was accelerated. Transmission electron microscopy result showed evidence of the stress relaxation of the film caused by the formation of tBN phase at the interface of the tBN and cBN phases.

Type
Rapid Communications
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Reinke, S., Kuhr, M., and Kulisch, W., Diamond Relat. Mater. 3, 341 (1994).Google Scholar
2.McKenzie, D.R., McFall, W.D., Sainty, W.G., Davis, C.A., and Collins, R.E., Diamond Relat. Mater. 2, 970 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Robertson, J., Diamond Relat. Mater. 5, 519 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Hofsäss, H., Feldermann, H., Merk, R., Sebastian, M., and Ronning, C., Appl. Phys. A 66, 153 (1998).Google Scholar
5.Kester, D.J., Ailey, K.S., Davis, R.F., and More, K.L., J. Mater. Res. 8, 1213 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Hahn, J., Richter, F., Pintaske, R., Röder, M., and Schneider, E., Surf. Coat. Technol. 92, 129 (1997).Google Scholar
7.Litvinov, D. and Clarke, R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 1969 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Kidner, S., Taylor, C.A. II, and Clarke, R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 64, 1859 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Ye, J., Rothhaar, U., and Oechsner, H., Surf. Coat. Technol. 105, 159 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Ullmann, J., Hayden, D., Schwarz, G., Wolf, G.K., Babe, K., and Hatada, R., Surf. Coat. Technol. 97, 281 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Berns, D.H. and Cappelli, M.A., J. Mater. Res. 12, 2014 (1997).Google Scholar
12.Fitz, C., Fukarek, W., Kolitsch, A., and Möller, W., Surf. Coat. Technol. 128–129, 292 (1997).Google Scholar
13.Klotzbücher, T. and Kreutz, E. W., Diamond Relat. Mater. 7, 1219 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar