Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T21:44:28.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phase equilibria among the superconductors in the Y2O3–BaO–Cu–O system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Zhigang Zhou  and
Alexandra Navrotsky
Zhigang Zhou
Affiliation:
Princeton Materials Institute and Department of Geological and Geophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544
Alexandra Navrotsky
Affiliation:
Princeton Materials Institute and Department of Geological and Geophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544
Get access

Abstract

The enthalpy of formation of Y2Ba4Cu7O14.864 at room temperature has been determined by using high-temperature reaction calorimetry. The standard enthalpy of formation of the 247 phase is ΔH°f = −5463 ± 18 kJ mol−1. Phase relationships among the superconductors, namely, the 123, 124, and 247, are assessed. It is intrinsic that impurity phases, such as Y2Cu2O5, BaCuO2, CuO, etc., coexist with the superconductors at equilibrium. Equilibria among the superconductor phases in the Y2O3–BaO–Cu–O system have been determined. The results show that, at the 124 bulk composition, the 247 phase coexists with the excess CuO in a narrow area of pO2 ∼ T space confined by the stability fields of the 124 phase and a mixture of the 123 + CuO. The standard free energies of carbonation and hydration of the 247 phase are also determined, which are −629 ± 13 kJ mol−1 and −873 ± 45 kJ mol−1, respectively. Like the 123 and 124 phases, the 247 phase is thermodynamically unstable for corrosion by water vapor and carbon dioxide in ambient atmosphere.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 14 , Issue 9 , September 1999 , pp. 3511 - 3517
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Zhou, Z. and Navrotsky, A., J. Mater. Res. 7, 2920 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Zhou, Z. and Navrotsky, A., J. Mater. Res. 8, 3023 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Zhou, Z., Navrotsky, A., and McClure, D.S., Phys. Chem. Glasses 36, 251 (1993).Google Scholar
4.Schwer, H., Kaldis, E., Karpinski, J., and Rossel, C., Physica C 211, 165 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Hewat, A.W., Fischer, P., Kaldis, E., Karpinski, J., Rusiecki, S., and Jilek, E., Physica C 167, 579 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Genoud, J-Y., Graf, T., Trsiscone, G., Junod, A., and Muller, J., Physica C 192, 137 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Karpinski, J., Rusiecki, S., Kaldis, E., and Jilet, E., J. Less-Comm. Met. 164–165, 3 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Tallon, J.L., Pooke, D.M., Buckely, R.G., Presland, R.R., and Blunt, F.J., Phys. Rev. B 41, 7220 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Genoud, J-Y., Graf, T., Junod, A., Sanchez, D., Triscone, G., and Muller, J., Physica C 177, 315 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Pooke, D.M., Buckley, R.G., Presland, M.R., and Talon, J.L., Phys. Rev. B 41, 6616 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Murakami, H., Suga, T., Noda, T., Shiohara, Y., and Tanaka, S., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 29, 2720 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Sawai, Y., Ishizaki, Kozo, Takata, M., and Narukawa, Yutaka, Physica C 176, 147 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Karpinski, J., Kaldis, E., Conder, K., Rusiecki, S., and Jilek, E., in Pressure Effects on Materials Processing and Design, edited by Ishizaki, K., Hodge, E., and Concannon, M. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 251, Pittsburgh, PA, 1992), p. 291.Google Scholar
14.Morris, D.E., Asmar, H.G., Nickel, J.H., Sid, R.L., Wei, J.Y.T, and Post, J.E., Physica C 159, 287 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Chandrachood, M.R., Mooris, D.E., and Sinha, P.B., Physica C 171, 187 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Karpinsky, J. (private communication).Google Scholar
17.Lindemer, T.B., Washburn, F.A., MacBougall, C.S., Feenstra, R., and Cavin, O.B., Phys. C 178, 93 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Robie, R.A., Hemingway, B.S., and Fisher, J.R., U.S. Geol. Survey Bull. 1452 (1979).Google Scholar
19.Conder, K., Rusiecki, S., and Kaldis, E., Mater. Res. Bull. 24, 581 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Parks, M.E., Navrotsky, A., Mocala, K., Takayama-Muromachi, E., Jacobson, A., and Davies, P.K., J. Solid State Chem. 79, 53 (1989); Erratum: J. Solid State Chem. 83, 218 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Conder, K., Karpinski, J., Kaldis, E., Rusiecki, S., and Jilek, E., Physica C 196, 164 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Zibold, A., Duerrler, M., Geserich, H.P., Erb, A., and Mueller-Vogt, G., Physica C 171, 151 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar