Article contents
Passivation of β–SiC surface with native and nonnative oxides
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 January 2011
Abstract
The passivation characteristics of various insulators are evaluated for the β–SiC surface. It is found that wet thermal oxides yield minimum electrical defects at the oxide-SiC interface. Dry thermal oxide results in too much charge either at the oxide-SiC interface or in the bulk. It is also shown that anodic aluminum oxide seems to possess suitable electrical properties for the fabrication of MOS structures on SiC, whereas the CVD silicon nitride proved to be the worst.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989
References
REFERENCES
1Nieberding, W. C. and J. Anthony Powell, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. IE-29 (2), 103 (1982).Google Scholar
4Parsons, J. D.Bunshah, R. F. and Stafsudd, O. M.Solid State Technol. 133 (Nov. 1985).Google Scholar
5Nishino, S.Powell, J. A. and Will, H. A.Appl. Phys. Lett. 42 (5), 460 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Schwartz, G. P. in The Physics of MOS Insulators, edited by Lucovsky, G., Pantelides, S. T. and Galeener, F. L. (Pergamon Press, New York, 1980), p. 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Susa, N. and Schmitt, F.Solid-State Sci. Technol., J. of the Elec-trochem. Soc. 130 (11), 2220 (1983).Google Scholar
9Chaudhry, M. Iqbal, “Ohmic Contacts and MOS Structures on Beta Silicon Carbide”, Ph.D. Dissertation University of Notre Dame (1986).Google Scholar
10Bayraktaroglu, B. and Johnson, R. L. in The Physics of MOS Insulators, edited by Lucovsky, G., Pantelides, S. T. and Galeener, F. L. (Pergamon Press, New York, 1980), p. 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9
- Cited by