Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T00:34:34.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A new method for tensile testing of thin films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2016

J. A. Ruud ,
D. Josell ,
F. Spaepen  and
A. L. Greer
J. A. Ruud
Affiliation:
Division of Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138
D. Josell
Affiliation:
Division of Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138
F. Spaepen
Affiliation:
Division of Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138
A. L. Greer
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, United Kingdom
Get access

Extract

A new method for tensile testing of thin films is presented. The strain is measured directly on the unsupported thin film from the displacement of laser spots diffracted from a thin grating applied to its surface by photolithography. The diffraction grating is two-dimensional, allowing strain measurement both along and transverse to the tensile direction. In principle, Young's modulus, Poisson's ratio, and the yield stress of a thin film can be determined. Cu, Ag, and Ni thin films with strong ⟨111⟩ texture were tested. The measured Young moduli agreed with those measured on bulk crystals, but the measured Poisson ratios were consistently low, most likely due to slight transverse folding of the film that developed during the test. The yield stresses of the evaporated Cu and Ag thin films agreed well with an extrapolation of the Hall-Petch relation found for bulk materials. Ni thin films are known to deviate from a bulk Ni Hall–Petch relation for submicron grain sizes, and sputtered Ni films show much higher yield stresses than electrodeposited or vapor-deposited films of similar grain size. Our sputtered Ni films had higher yield stresses than other sputtered films from the literature.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , January 1993 , pp. 112 - 117
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hardwick, D.A., Thin Solid Films 154, 109 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Koehler, J. S., Phys. Rev. B 2, 547 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Lehoczky, S. L., J. Appl. Phys. 49, 5479 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Baral, D., Ketterson, J.B., and Hilliard, J.E., J. Appl. Phys. 57, 1076 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Davis, B.M., Seidman, D.N., Moreau, A., Ketterson, J.B., Matson, J., and Grimsditch, M., Phys. Rev. B 43, 9304 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Cammarata, R. C., Scripta Metall. 20, 479 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Cammarata, R.C. and Sieradzki, K., Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2005 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Andeen, C. G., Hagerling, C. W., and Hoffman, R. W., Proc. 7th Int. Vacuum Congr. and 3rd Int. Conf. on Solid Surfaces, Vienna, Austria, 1977, p. 1769.Google Scholar
9. Davis, B. M., Li, D. X., Seidman, D. N., Ketterson, J. B., Bhadra, R., and Grimsditch, M., J. Mater. Res. 7, 1356 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Henning, C. A. O., Boswell, F.W., and Corbett, J.M., Acta Metall. 23, 177 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Tsakalakos, T. and Hilliard, J.E., J. Appl. Phys. 54, 734 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Moreau, A., Ketterson, J. B., and Mattson, J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 1959 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Baral, D., Hilliard, J. E., Ketterson, J. B., and Miyano, K., J. Appl. Phys. 53, 3552 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Huntington, H. B., in Solid State Physics, edited by Seitz, F. and Turnbull, D. (Academic Press Inc., New York, 1958), p. 274.Google Scholar
15. Menter, J. W. and Pashley, D. W., in Structure and Properties of Thin Films, edited by Neugebauer, C. A., Newkirk, J. B., and Vermilyea, D. A. (John Wiley, New York, 1959), p. 111.Google Scholar
16. Neugebauer, C.A., J. Appl. Phys. 31, 1096 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Catlin, A. and Walker, W.P., J. Appl. Phys. 31, 2135 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Miller, G.A., Avery, D.H., and Backofen, W.A., Trans. Metall. Soc. AIME 236, 1667 (1966).Google Scholar
19. Thompson, A.W. and Backofen, W.A., Metall. Trans. 2, 2004 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Merz, M. D. and Dahlgren, S. D., J. Appl. Phys. 46, 3235 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Carreker, R.P., Trans. AIME 209, 112 (1957).Google Scholar
22. Thompson, A.W., Acta Metall. 23, 1337 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Wilcox, B.A. and Clauer, A.H., Acta Metall. 20, 743 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Springarn, J. R., Jacobson, B. E., and Nix, W. D., Thin Solid Films 45, 507 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Dahlgren, S.D., Nicholson, W.L., Merz, M.D., Bollmann, W., Devlin, J. F., and Wang, R., Thin Solid Films 40, 345 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar