Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T23:18:53.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Neodymium doped titania as photoanode and graphene oxide–CuS composite as counter electrode material in quantum dot solar cell

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2015

Laveena P. D'Souza ,
Sreeramareddygari Muralikrishna ,
Hunsur R. Chandan ,
Thippeswamy Ramakrishnappa  and
R. Geetha Balakrishna
Laveena P. D'Souza
Affiliation:
Center for Nano and Material Sciences, Jain University, Bangalore 562112, India
Sreeramareddygari Muralikrishna
Affiliation:
Center for Nano and Material Sciences, Jain University, Bangalore 562112, India
Hunsur R. Chandan
Affiliation:
Center for Nano and Material Sciences, Jain University, Bangalore 562112, India
Thippeswamy Ramakrishnappa
Affiliation:
Center for Nano and Material Sciences, Jain University, Bangalore 562112, India
R. Geetha Balakrishna*
Affiliation:
Center for Nano and Material Sciences, Jain University, Bangalore 562112, India
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The enhanced photoresponse of commercial TiO2 (C-TiO2) nanoparticles in quantum dot (QD) sensitized solar cells, when doped with neodymium (Nd), is explored for graphene oxide–copper sulphide (GO–CuS) composite material as counter electrode. The modification of C-TiO2 and the preparation of GO–CuS were done by solid state and sonication methods respectively. The same were characterized by spectroscopy, microscopy, and cyclic voltammetry techniques. Results clearly indicate an enhanced conversion efficiency of ∼1.6 times over the undoped C-TiO2. UV and reflectance spectroscopy reveal that the dopants/defects/oxygen vacancies create midbands causing favorable surface electron states which act as electron traps suppressing recombination and the same is later detrapped leading to an efficient electron transfer. The retention of anatase phase, increase in particle size and decrease in band gap energy to visible range together with high surface area imparted by the GO to CuS in counter electrode facilitate good light harvesting and rapid enhanced electron transfer to redox system on doping. These findings make Nd–TiO2 a good photoanode material and GO–CuS a good counter electrode in QD solar cells.

Keywords

Nd doped TiO2GO–CuS compositeCdSe quantum dotssolar cell
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 30 , Issue 21 , 13 November 2015 , pp. 3241 - 3251
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Contributing Editor: Mauricio Terrones

References

REFERENCES

Pan, Z., Zhao, K., Wang, J., Zhang, H., Feng, Y., and Zhong, X.: Near infrared absorption of CdSe x Te1–x alloyed quantum dot sensitized solar cells with more than 6% efficiency and high stability. ACS Nano 7, 5215 (2013).Google Scholar
Li, Z., Xie, Y., Xu, H., Wang, T., Xu, Z., and Zhang, H.: Expanding the photoresponse range of TiO2 nanotube arrays by CdS/CdSe/ZnS quantum dots co-modification. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 224, 25 (2011).Google Scholar
Balis, N., Dracopoulos, V., Bourikas, K., and Lianos, P.: Quantum dot sensitized solar cells based on an optimized combination of ZnS, CdS and CdSe with CoS and CuS counter electrodes. Electrochim. Acta 91, 246 (2013).Google Scholar
Lightcap, I.V. and Kamat, P.V.: Fortification of CdSe quantum dots with graphene oxide. Excited state interations and light energy conversion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 7109 (2012).Google Scholar
Fan, S., Kim, D., Kim, J., Jung, D.W., Kang, S.O., and Ko, J.: Highly efficient CdSe quantum dot sensitized TiO2 photoelectrodes for solar cell applications. Electrochem.Commun. 11, 1337 (2009).Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Pedro, V., Shen, Q., Jovanovski, V., Gimenez, S., Zaera, R.T., Toyoda, T., and Sera, I.M.: Ultrafast characterisation of the electron injection from CdSe quantum dots and dye N719 co-sensitizers into TiO2 using sulphide based ionic liquid for enhanced long term stability. Electrochim. Acta 100, 35 (2013).Google Scholar
Duan, Y., Fu, N., Liu, Q., Fang, Y., Zhou, X., and Zhang, J.: Sn-doped TiO2 photoanode for dye sensitized solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. C 116, 8888 (2012).Google Scholar
Archana, P.S., Gupta, A., Yusoff, M.M., and Jose, R.: Tungsten doped titanium dioxide nanowires for high efficiency dye-sensitized solar cells. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 7448 (2014).Google Scholar
Nam, T.V., Trang, N.T., and Cong, B.T.: Mg-doped TiO2 for dye-sensitive solar cell: An electronic structure study. Proc. Natl. Conf. Theor. Phys. 37, 233 (2012).Google Scholar
Rengaraj, S., Venkatraj, S., Yeon, J.W., Kim, Y., Li, X.Z., and Pang, G.K.S.: Preparation, characterisation and application of Nd-TiO2 photocatalyst for the reduction of Cr (VI) under UV light illumination. Appl. Catal., B 77, 157 (2007).Google Scholar
Li, D., Haneda, H., Hishita, S., Ohashi, N., and Labhsetwar, N.K.: Fluorine-doped TiO2 powders prepared by spray pyrolysis and their improved photocatalytic activity for decomposition of gas-phase acetaldehyde. J. Fluorine Chem. 126, 69 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Y., Chen, C., Yang, X., Li, X., and Wang, B.: Preparation, characterization and photocatalytic activity of the neodymium-doped TiO2 nanotubes. Appl. Surf. Sci. 255, 8624 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López-Luke, T., Wolcott, A., Xu, L., Chen, S., Wen, Z., Li, J., Rosa, E.D.L., and Zhang, J.Z.: Nitrogen-doped and CdSe quantum dot sensitized nanocrystalline TiO2 films for solar energy conversion application. J. Phys. Chem. C 112, 1282 (2008).Google Scholar
Minchitha, K.U. and Balakrishna, R.G.: Structural modification and property tailoring in titania for high efficiency in sunlight. Mater. Chem. Phys. 136, 720 (2012).Google Scholar
Paul, G.S., Kim, J.H., Kim, M.S., Do, K., Ko, J., and Yu, J.S.: Different hierarchical nanostructured carbons as counter electrodes for CdS quantum dot solar cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 4, 375 (2011).Google Scholar
Ye, M., Chen, C., Zhang, N., Wen, X., Guo, W., and Lin, C.: Quantum-dot sensitized solar cells employing hierarchical Cu2S microspheres wrapped by reduced graphene oxide nanosheets as effective counter electrodes. Adv. Energy Mater. 4, 1301564 (2014). doi: 10.1002/aenm.201301564.Google Scholar
Radich, J.G., Dwyer, R., and Kamat, P.V.: Cu2S reduced graphene oxide composite for high-efficiency quantum dot solar cells. Overcoming the redox limitations of S2 –/S n 2– at the counter electrode. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2, 2453 (2011).Google Scholar
Lee, H.J., Chang, D.W., Park, S., Zakeerruddin, S.M., Gratzel, M., and Nazeeruddin, M.K.: CdSe quantum dot (QD) and molecular dye hybrid sensitizers for TiO2 mesoporous solar cells: Working together with a common hole carrier of cobalt complexes. Chem. Commun. 46, 8788 (2010).Google Scholar
Mathesh, M., Liu, J., Nam, N.D., Lam, S.K.H., Zheng, R., Barrow, C.J., and Yang, W.: Facile synthesis of graphene oxide hybrids bridged by copper ions for increased conductivity. J. Mater. Chem. C. 1, 3084 (2013).Google Scholar
Roy-Mayhew, J.D., Bozym, D.J., Punckt, C., and Aksay, I.A.: Functionalized graphene as a catalytic counter electrode in dye—sensitized solar cells. ACS Nano 4, 6203 (2010).Google Scholar
Chen, L., Tuo, L., Rao, J., and Zhou, X.: TiO2 doped with different ratios of graphene and optimized application in CdS/CdSe quantum dot-sensitized solar cells. Mater. Lett. 124, 161 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luan, X., Chen, L., Zhang, J., Qu, G., Flake, J.C., and Wanga, Y.: Electrophoretic deposition of reduced graphene oxide nano sheets on TiO2 nanotube arrays for dye sensitized solar cells. Electrochim. Acta 111, 216 (2013).Google Scholar
Kathalingum, A., Rhee, J., and Han, S.: Effects of graphene counter electrode and CdSe quantum dots in TiO2 and ZnO on dye sensitized solar cell performance. Int. J. Energy. Res. 38, 674 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bai, J. and Jiang, X.: A facile one-pot synthesis of copper sulfide-decorated reduced graphene oxide composites for enhanced detecting of H2O2 in biological environments. Anal. Chem. 85, 8095 (2013).Google Scholar
Shwetharani, R., Jyothi, M.S., Laveena, P.D., and Balakrishna, R.G.: Photoactive titania float for disinfection of water; evaluation of cell damage by bioanalytical techniques. Photochem. Photobiol. 90, 1099 (2014).Google Scholar
Hummers, W.S. and Offman, R.E.: Preparation of graphitic oxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 80, 1339 (1958).Google Scholar
Chandan, H.R., Saravanan, V., Pai, R.K., and Balakrishna, R.G.: Synergistic effect of binary ligands on nucleation and growth/size effect of nanocrystals: Studies on reusability of the solvent. J. Mater. Res. 29, 1556 (2014).Google Scholar
Amoli, V. and Sinha, A.K.: Synthesis of multiwalled TiO2 nanotubes under weak alkaline conditions for dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 15, 726 (2014).Google Scholar
Chen, X. and Mao, S.S.: Titanium dioxide nanomaterials: Synthesis, properties, modifications and applications. Chem. Rev. 107, 2896 (2007).Google Scholar
Klimov, V.I.: Semiconductor and Metal Nanocrystals. Synthesis and Electronic and Optical Properties, 1st ed. (New York: CRC Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Shwetharani, R., Fernando, C.A.N., and Balakrishana, G.R.: Excellent hydrogen evolution by a multi approach via structure property tailoring of titania. RSC Adv. 5, 39127 (2015).Google Scholar
Yan, J., Wu, G., Guan, N., Li, L., Li, Z., and Cao, X.: Understanding the effect of surface/bulk defects on the photocatalytic activity of TiO2: Anstase versus rutile. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15, 10978 (2013).Google Scholar
Zhang, J., Zhao, Z., Wang, X., Yu, T., Guan, J., Yu, Z., Li, Z., and Zou, Z.: Increasing oxygen vacancy density on the TiO2 surface by La-doping for dye—sensitized solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 18396 (2010).Google Scholar
Netravathi, C., Vishwanath, B., Michael, J., and Rajamath, M.: Hydrothermal synthesis of amonoclinic VO2 nanotube-graphene hybrid for use as cathode material in lithium ion batteries. Carbon 50, 4843 (2012).Google Scholar
Muralikrishna, S., Sureshkumar, H., Varley, T.S., Nagaraju, D.H., and Ramakrishnappa, T.: Insitu reduction and functionalization of graphene oxide with L-cyateine for simultaneous electrochemical determination of cadmium (II), lead (II), copper (II) and mercury (II) ions. Anal. Methods 6, 8698 (2014).Google Scholar
Zen, J., Chung, H., and Kumar, A.S.: Flow injection analysis of hydrogen peroxide on copper plated screen printed carbon electrodes. Analyst 125, 1633 (2000).Google Scholar
Wang, T., Hu, J., Yang, W., and Zhang, H., Electrodeposition of monodispersed metal nanoparticles in a nafion film: Towards highly active nanocatalysts. Electrochem. Commun. 10, 814 (2008).Google Scholar
Kamat, P.V.: Quantum dot solar cells. The next big thing in photovoltaics. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 4, 908 (2013).Google Scholar
Xua, X., Gimenez, S., Mora-Sera, I., Abate, A., Bisquer, J., and Xu, G.: Influence of cysteine adsorption on the performance of CdSe quantum dots sensitized solar cells. Mater. Chem. Phys. 124, 709 (2010).Google Scholar
Mora-Sera, I., Gimenez, S., Moehl, T., Santiago, F., Lana-Villareal, T., Gomez, R., and Bisquert, J.: Factro determining the photovoltaic performance of a CdSe quantum dot sensitized solar cell: The role of linker molecule and of the counter electrode. Nanotechnology 19, 424007 (2008).Google Scholar
Jun, H.K., Careemm, M.A., and Arof, A.K.: Performances of some low-cost counter electrode materials in CdS and CdSe quantum dot-sensitized solar cells. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 9, 69 (2014).Google Scholar
Bingham, S. and Daoud, W.A.: Recent advances in making nano-sized TiO2 visible-light active through rare-earth metal doping. J. Mater. Chem. 21, 2041–2050 (2011).Google Scholar
Sudhagar, P., Song, T., Lee, D.H., Mora-Sera, I., Bisquert, J., Laudenslager, M., Sigmund, W.M., Park, W.I., Paik, U. and Kang, Y.S.: High open circuit voltage quantum dot sensitized solar cells manufactured with ZnO nanowire arrays and Si/ZnO branched hierarchical structures. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2, 1984 (2011).Google Scholar