Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-w79xw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-21T17:27:05.650Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Morphology of twinned diamond particles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

Long Wang ,
John C. Angus  and
David Aue
Long Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-7204
John C. Angus
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-7217
David Aue
Affiliation:
Digital Instruments, Inc., 520 E. Montecito Street, Santa Barbara, California 93103
Get access

Abstract

Morphology of twinned diamond particles grown by chemical vapor deposition was characterized by atomic force microscopy in both contact and tapping modes. Quantitative angle measurements using a surface normal algorithm were performed on untwinned crystals, penetration twins, re-entrant corners, and fivefold dimples. Tip-sample interaction is discussed. The morphology of the penetration twins and some of the re-entrant corners can be explained by low order Σ3 twins and flat crystallographic surfaces. Abnormally shallow re-entrants with large vicinal faces are attributed to rapid nucleation of new layers at a point along the re-entrant intersection.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 10 , Issue 12 , December 1995 , pp. 3037 - 3040
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Angus, J.C., Sunkara, M., Sahaida, S.R., and Glass, J.T., J. Mater. Res. 7, 3001 (1992).Google Scholar
2Wild, C., Kohl, R., Herres, N., Muler-Sebert, W., and Koidl, P., Diamond and Related Mater. 3, 373 (1994).Google Scholar
3Tamor, M.A. and Everson, M.P., J. Mater. Res. 9, 1839 (1994).Google Scholar
4Shechtman, D., Hutchison, J.L., Robins, L.H., Farabaugh, E.N., and Feldman, A., J. Mater. Res. 8, 473 (1993).Google Scholar
5Everson, M.P. and Tamor, M.A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 9, 1570 (1991).Google Scholar
6Hurlbut, C.S., Dana's Manual of Mineralogy, 18th ed. (John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1971). p. 31.Google Scholar
7George, M.A., Binger, A., Collins, W.E., Davidson, J.L., Barnes, A.V., and Tolk, N.H., J. Appl. Phys. 76, 4099 (1994).Google Scholar
8Wilson, D.L., Kump, K.S., Eppell, S.J., and Marchant, R.E., unpublished.Google Scholar
9Everson, M.P., Tamor, M.A., Scholl, D., Stoner, B.R., Sahaida, S.R., and Bade, J.P., J. Appl. Phys. 75, 169 (1994).Google Scholar
10Kitamura, M., Hosoya, S., and Sunagawa, J., J. Cryst. Growth 47, 93 (1979).Google Scholar
11Angus, J.C. and Dyble, T.J., Surf. Sci. 50, 157 (1975).Google Scholar
12Angus, J.C. and Ponton, J.W., Surf. Sci. 61, 451 (1976).Google Scholar
13Shechtman, D., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 184, 113 (1994).Google Scholar
14Shechtman, D., Feldman, A., Vaudin, M.D., and Hutchison, J.L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 62, 487 (1993).Google Scholar