Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T11:27:29.665Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Morphology and thermal characteristics of nano-sized Pb–Sn inclusions in Al

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

P. Bhattacharya
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, and Department of Metallurgy, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore-560012, India
V. Bhattacharya
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore-560012, India
K. Chattopadhyay
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore-560012, India
Get access

Abstract

Nanoembedded aluminum alloys with bimetallic dispersoids of Sn and Pb of compositions Sn82–Pb18, Sn64–Pb36, and Sn54–Pb46 were synthesized by rapid solidification. The two phases, face-centered-cubic Pb and tetragonal Sn solid-solution, coexist in all the particles. The crystallographic relation between the two phases and the matrix depends upon the solidification pathways adopted by the particles. For Al–(Sn82–Pb18), we report a new orientation relation given by [011]Al//[010]Sn and (o11)A1//(101)Sn. Pb exhibits a cube-on-cube orientation with Al in few particles, while in others no orientation relationship could be observed. In contrast, Pb in Sn64–Pb36 and Sn54–Pb46 particles always exhibits cube-on-cube orientation with the matrix. Sn does not show any orientation relationship with Al or Pb in these cases. Differential scanning calorimetry studies revealed melting at eutectic temperature for all compositions, although solidification pathways are different. Attempts were made to correlate these with the melting and heterogeneous nucleation characteristics.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Moore, K.I., Chattopadhyay, K., and Cantor, B., Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A414, 499 (1987).Google Scholar
2.Saka, H., Nishikawa, Y., and Imura, T., Philos. Mag. A 57, 895 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Chattopadhyay, K. and Goswami, R., Prog. Mater. Sci. 42, 287 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Zhang, D.L., Chattopadhyay, K., and Cantor, B., J. Mater. Sci. 26, 1531 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Kim, W.T. and Cantor, B., J. Mater. Sci. 26, 2868 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Hagege, S. and Dahmen, U., Philos. Mag. Lett. 74, 259 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Bhattacharya, P., Mazumdar, B., and Chattopadhyay, K., J. Electron Microscopy 48(Suppl.), 1047 (1999).Google Scholar
8.Johnson, E. and Dahmen, U., Microsc. Microanal. 3, 409 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Johnson, E., Touboltsev, V.S., Johansen, A., Dahmen, U., and Hagege, S., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. in Phys. Res. B 127/128, 727 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Johnson, E., Bhal, C.R.H., Touboltsev, V.S., and Johansen, A., in Nucleation and Growth Processes in Materials, edited by Gonis, A., Turchi, P.E.A., and Ardell, A.J. (Mat. Res. Soc. Sym. Proc., 580, Warrendale, PA, 2000), p. 177.Google Scholar
11.Johnson, E., Johansen, A., Nelson, C., and Dahmen, U., J. Electron Microscopy 51(Suppl.), 201 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Fecht, H.J. and Perepezko, J.H., Metall. Trans. A 20A, 785 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Fecht, H.J., Zhang, M.X., Chang, Y.A., and Perepezko, J.H., Metall. Trans. A 20A, 795 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Mori, K., Ishihara, K.N., and Shingu, P.H., Mater. Sci. Eng. 78, 157 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar