1Upite, G. and Varenca, S., Tezisy Dokl. Vses. Simp. Akt. Pverkhn. Tel 2, 55 (1977); Chem. Abstr. 92, 14451J (1980).Google Scholar

2Muecke, K.H., Metalloberfläche 31, 506 (1977); Chem. Abstr. 88, 31077b (1978).Google Scholar

3Fujitsu Ltd., Japanese Patent 48/98732 (1983); Chem. Abstr. 101, 63762z (1984).Google Scholar

4Zydzik, G. J., Uitert, L.G. Van, Singh, S., and Kyle, T.R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 31, 697 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5Mitchell, I. V., Williams, J. S., Smith, P., and Elliman, R. G., Appl. Phys. Lett. 44, 193 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6Werner, B.T., Vreeland, T. Jr , Mendenhall, M.H., Qui, Y., and Tombrello, T.A., Thin Solid Films 104, 163 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7Griffith, J.E., Qui, Y., and Tombrello, T.A., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. 198, 607 (1982); Chem. Abstr. 97, 119011x (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8Chaudhury, M.K. and Plueddemann, E. P., J. Adhesion Sci. Tech. 1, 243 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9Nuzzo, R. G. and Allara, D. L., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 105, 4481 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10Bain, C. D., Troughton, E.B., Tao, Y-T., Evall, J., and Whitesides, G. M., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 111, 321 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11Porter, M.D., Bright, T. B., Allara, D.L., and C.Chidsey, E. D., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 109, 3559 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12Troughton, E. B., Bain, C.D., Whitesides, G.M., Nuzzo, R.G., Allara, D.L., and Porter, M. D., Langmuir 4, 365 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13Nuzzo, R. G., Zegarski, B.R., and Dubois, L. H., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 109, 733 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14Stable bis(alkylthiolate) gold(I) salts (Au(SR)₂^-) have been prepared by reaction of Au(I) dihalides with alkylthiolates. Bowmaker, G. A. and Dobson, B.C., J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 267 (1981).Google Scholar

15Allara, D.L., Heburd, A. F., Padden, F. J., Nuzzo, R.G., and Falcon, D.R., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 376 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16Allara, D. L. and Nuzzo, R. G., U.S. Patent 4690715 (1987).Google Scholar

17Stewart, K.R., Whitesides, G.M., Godfried, H.P., and Silvera, I.F., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 57, 1381 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18Pintchovski, F., Price, J.B., Tobin, P. J., Peavey, J., and Kobold, K., J. Electrochem. Soc. 126, 1428 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

19Solutions of 1 were used within 48 h of preparation. While a rigorously dry atmosphere was not required, too high a water content in the atmo-sphere resulted in polymerization and precipitation of the starting silane.Google Scholar

20Wasserman, S.R., Tao, Y-T., and Whitesides, G.M., Langmuir (in press).Google Scholar

21The thioacetate was subjected to acidic rather than basic hydrolysis since monolayers from alkyltrichlorosilanes are not stable in base.Google Scholar

22This range is not significant. Ellipsometric measurements for organic monolayers on silicon have a precision of ± 2 Å.Google Scholar

23Monolayers prepared from methyl-terminated alkyltrichlorosilanes are apparently oriented nearly perpendicular (tilt angle ≈ 14 ± 18°) to the substrate surface in a trans -extended chain. Maoz, R. and Sagiv, J., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 100, 465 (1984). N. Tillman, A. Ulman, J.S. Schildkraut, and T. L. Penner, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 110, 6136 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

24Wasserman, S.R., Whitesides, G.M., Tidswell, I.M., Ocko, B., Pershan, P.S., and Axe, J. D., J. Am. Chem. Soc. (in press).Google Scholar

25The bond lengths of typical C-S and C-C bonds are 1.85 and 1.54 Arespectively. Assuming a bond angle of 120°, we would predict a de-crease of 2.93 Å upon hydrolysis of the thioacetate group in a completely formed monolayer. For the partial monolayers studied here, this predicted change must be corrected for the fractional coverage of the surface, in this case approximately 60%. For these monolayers the expected change in length would therefore be approximately 2 Å. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, edited by Weast, R. C. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1984), 65th ed., pp. F–166.Google Scholar

26Bain, C.D., Biebuyck, H. A., and Whitesides, G.M., Langmuir (in press).Google Scholar

27We do not know whether this binding energy indicates the presence of a thiol or of a disulfide. The difference in the binding energies of the S 2p electrons in a thiol (163.3 eV) and a disulfide (163.0 eV) is small. Values for the S 2s electrons are expected to differ by similar amounts. The difference in these binding energies is similar to the errors in our reference peaks. See Refs. 13 and 26.Google Scholar

28Adhesive failure for the thiol-terminated monolayers occurred, on average, in ̃15% of the total area covered by the tape. On individual samples failure was found over 2-50% of the surface. For the thio-acetate-terminated monolayers, failure occurred only on 25% of the samples and removed gold from less than 1% of the area covered by the tape. We believe that this difference in failure rates probably reflects contamination of the thiol interface during the hydrolysis of the thioacetate group.Google Scholar

29Since the monolayers prepared from HTS were longer than those created from 1, the Au/C ratio exaggerates the difference in the amount of gold left on these surfaces. Comparisons to the Si 2p signal, which underestimates this difference, indicate that at least six times as much gold was left on the thiol-terminated interface as on the methyl-terminated one.Google Scholar

30The binding energy of the gold is referenced to an average of the C 1s, O 1s, and Si 2p signals.Google Scholar

31The binding energy of the sulfur in the thiol-terminated mono-layer (228.4 eV) was between that of the sulfur in the thioacetate group (228.7 eV) and that of the sulfur in the thiol bound to the gold (228.0 eV). Uncertainties in the reference peaks were, however, almost as large as this shift.Google Scholar

32The difference in the 2p binding energy for a sulfur in a thiol group and that in a thiolate form (RS^-) is ̃ 2.8 eV. Values for the S 2s electrons are expected to differ by similar amounts. Lindberg, B.J., Hamrin, K., Johansson, G., Gelius, Y., Fahlman, A., Nordling, C., Siegbahn, K.Physica Scripta 1, 286 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

33Wertheim, G.K., DiCenzo, S.B., and Youngquist, S.E., Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 2310 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

34Lukevics, E., Belyakova, Z. V., Pomerantseva, M. G., and Voronkovin, M. G.Journal of Organometallic Chemistry Library 5: Organometallic Chemistry Reviews, edited by Seyferth, D., Davies, A. G., Fischer, E. O., Normant, J. F., and Reutov, O. A. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1977), pp. 1–179 and the references therein.Google Scholar

35McCracken, F. L., Passaglia, E., Stromberg, R. R., and Steinberg, H. L., J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand., Sect. A. 67, 363 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

36These sensitivities are those provided by Surface Science Laboratories in their ESCA 8.0B software. These sensitivities reflect both the inherent photoionization cross section of each element and the dependence of the mean free path of an electron on its energy. Scofield, J. H., J. Electron Spectrosc. 8, 129 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar