Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T01:56:51.991Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Model analysis of boundary residual stress and its effect on toughness in thin boundary layered yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystalline ceramics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

J. L. Shi
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of High Performance Ceramics and Superfine Microstructure, Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, 1295 Ding-Xi Road, Shanghai, 200050, People's Republic of China
Z. L. Lu
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of High Performance Ceramics and Superfine Microstructure, Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, 1295 Ding-Xi Road, Shanghai, 200050, People's Republic of China
J. K. Guo
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of High Performance Ceramics and Superfine Microstructure, Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, 1295 Ding-Xi Road, Shanghai, 200050, People's Republic of China
Get access

Abstract

The average thermal residual stress in a continuous boundary phase in polycrystalline ceramic composites was calculated with a simple thin boundary layer model, and a criterion for the self-cracking of the boundary phase was derived under a certain assumption. From the proposed model, the toughness of the materials can be increased by both tensile and compressive stress at boundaries when the crack propagates transgranularly. The toughness will be increased when the stress at boundary is compressive for intergranular fracture mode. The maximum increase is predicted to be achieved at boundary phase contents below 33%. The experimental results for yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystalline ceramics doped with different kinds of grain-boundary phase is in a qualitative agreement with the prediction by the model, but the toughness increase is largely dependent on the distribution feature of glass phases.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Selsing, J., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 44, 419 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Hong, Z. and Zongzhe, J., J. Chin. Ceram. Soc. 24, 491 (1996).Google Scholar
3.Budiansky, B., Amazigo, J.C., and Evans, A.G., J. Mech. Phys. Solids 36, 167 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Wei, G.C. and Becher, P.F., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 67, 571 (1984).Google Scholar
5.Zhan, G.D., Lai, T.R., Shi, J.L., and Yen, T.S., J. Mater. Sci. 31, 2903 (1996)Google Scholar
6.Zhang, Y.F., Deng, Z.Y., Shi, J.L., Mao, Y.Q., and Guo, J.K., J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 15, 1927 (1996).Google Scholar
7.Becher, P.F., Hsueh, C.H., Angelini, P., and Tiegs, T.N., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 71, 1050 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Zhan, G.D., Shi, J.L., Zhou, Y., Zhan, Y.Z., Lai, T.R., and Yen, T.S.. J. Mater. Sci. 31, 3237 (1996).Google Scholar
9.Becher, P.F., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74, 255 (1991).Google Scholar
10.Marshall, D.B. and Evans, A.G., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 68, 225 (1985).Google Scholar
11.Evans, A.G., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73, 187 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Lange, F.F., Philos. Mag. 22, 983 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Evans, A.G., Philos. Mag. 26, 1327 (1972).Google Scholar
14.Faber, K.T. and Evans, A.G., Acta Metall. 31, 565 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Virkar, A.V. and Johnson, D.L., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 60, 514 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Taya, M., Hayashi, S., Kobayashi, A.S., and Yoon, H.S., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73, 1382 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Chermant, J.L. and Ostersteck, F., J. Mater. Soc. 1, 1936 (1976).Google Scholar
18.Culter, R.V. and Virkar, A.V., J. Mater. Sci. 20, 3557 (1985).Google Scholar
19.Shi, J.L., Lin, Z.X., and Yen, T.S., J. Mater. Sci. 28, 342 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Shetty, D.K., Wright, I.G., Mincer, P.N., and Clauer, A.H., J. Mater. Sci. 20, 1873 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar