Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T03:12:09.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microstructure and texture evolution in Mg–Al–Zn–(AgIn) alloy during single and multiple pass warm rolling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2015

Javed Kamran
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences (PIEAS), Nilore, Islamabad, 45650Pakistan
Shamas ud-Din
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences (PIEAS), Nilore, Islamabad, 45650Pakistan
Naeem-ul-Haq Tariq*
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences (PIEAS), Nilore, Islamabad, 45650Pakistan
Fahad Ali
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences (PIEAS), Nilore, Islamabad, 45650Pakistan
Hasan Bin Awais
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences (PIEAS), Nilore, Islamabad, 45650Pakistan
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected], [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The present research is focused on studying the evolution of microstructure and texture of a magnesium based alloy with the target composition Mg–3Al–1Zn–(0.5AgIn). Three samples A, B, and C were warm rolled at 300 °C to a cumulative reduction of 33% in 1, 2, and 8 passes, respectively. The optical microstructures and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) results revealed that sample A possessed more dynamic recrystallization (DRX) as compared to samples B and C. A split of basal pole from normal direction (ND) toward transverse direction (TD) was observed for sample A. However, as the number of passes was increased, the basal pole split was converted into a single peak for samples B and C. The basal intensity of sample C became almost double than that of sample A. It was concluded that a higher reduction per pass resulted in a larger volume fraction of DRXed grains and a weaker basal texture.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Mordike, B.L. and Ebert, T.: Magnesium properties — applications — potential. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 332, 3745 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, H., Huang, G., Roven, H.J., Wang, L., and Pan, F.: Influence of different rolling routes on the microstructure evolution and properties of AZ31 magnesium alloy sheets. Mater. Des. 50, 667673 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, C.W., Lui, T.S., Chen, L.H., and Hung, H.E.: Tensile mechanical properties and failure behaviors with the ductile-to-brittle transition of the α + β-type Mg–Li–Al–Zn alloy. Scr. Mater. 61, 11411144 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agnew, S.R., Senn, J.W., and Horton, J.A.: Mg sheet metal forming: Lessons learned from deep drawing Li and Y solid-solution alloys. JOM 58, 6269 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, W., Huang, S., Li, D., and Peng, Y.: Mechanical anisotropy and deep drawing behaviors of AZ31 magnesium alloy sheets produced by unidirectional and cross rolling. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 215, 320326 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadeghi, A. and Pekguleryuz, M.: Recrystallization and texture evolution of Mg–3%Al–1%Zn–(0.4–0.8)%Sr alloys during extrusion. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 528, 16781685 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agnew, S.R., Yoo, M.H., and Tome, C.N.: Application of texture simulation to understanding mechanical behavior of Mg and solid solution alloys containing Li or Y. Acta Mater. 49, 42774289 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, X., Suzuki, K., Watazu, A., Shigematsu, I., and Saito, N.: Effects of thickness reduction per pass on microstructure and texture of Mg–3Al–1Zn alloy sheet processed by differential speed rolling. Scr. Mater. 60, 964967 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yukutake, E., Kaneko, J., and Sugamata, M.: Anisotropy and non-uniformity in plastic behavior of AZ31 magnesium alloy plates. Mater. Trans. 44, 452457 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iwanaga, K., Tashiro, H., Okamoto, H., and Shimizu, K.: Improvement of formability from room temperature to warm temperature in AZ-31 magnesium alloy. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 155156, 13131316 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, X.S., Suzuki, K., Watazu, A., Shigematsu, I., and Saito, N.: Improvement of formability of Mg–Al–Zn alloy sheet at low temperatures using differential speed rolling. J. Alloys Compd. 470, 263268 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suh, B., Shim, M., Shin, K.S., and Kim, N.J.: Current issues in magnesium sheet alloys: Where do we go from here? Scr. Mater. 8485, 16 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Standford, N. and Barnett, M.R.: The origin of “rare earth” texture development in extruded Mg-based alloys and its effect on tensile ductility. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 496, 399408 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, M.R., Standford, N., Cizek, P., Beer, A., Xuebin, Z., and Keshavarz, Z.: Deformation mechanisms in Mg and the challenge of extending room-temperature plasticity. JOM 61, 1924 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, H., Mukai, T., Mabuchi, M., and Higashi, K.: Superplastic deformation mechanism in powder metallurgy magnesium alloys and composites. Acta Mater. 49, 20272037 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, H., Tsutsui, H., Mukai, T., Kohzu, M., Tanabe, S., and Higashi, K.: Deformation mechanism in a coarse-grained Mg-Al-Zn alloy at elevated temperatures. Int. J. Plast. 17, 387397 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, J. and Al-Samman, T.: Superior light metals by texture engineering: Optimized aluminum and magnesium alloys for automotive applications. Acta Mater. 61, 818843 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masoumi, M. and Pekguleryuz, M.: The influence of Sr on the microstructure and texture evolution of rolled Mg–1%Zn alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 529, 207214 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marya, M., Hector, L.G., Verma, R., and Tong, W.: Microstructural effects of AZ31 magnesium alloy on its tensile deformation and failure behaviors. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 418, 341356 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yim, C.D., Seo, Y.M., and You, B.S.: Effect of the reduction ratio per pass on the microstructure of a hot-rolled AZ31 magnesium alloy sheet. Met. Mater. Int. 15, 683688 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukai, T., Watanabe, H., Ishikawa, K., and Higashi, K.: Guide for enhancement of room temperature ductility in Mg alloys at high strain rates. Mater. Sci. Forum 419422, 171176 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, X., Suzuki, K., Watazu, A., Shigematsu, I., and Saito, N.: Microstructural and textural evolution of AZ31 magnesium alloy during differential speed rolling. J. Alloys Compd. 479, 726731 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, R., Liu, L., Wu, Y., Cai, X., and Shen, H.: Microstructure and mechanical properties of variable-plane-rolled Mg–3Al–1Zn alloy. Mater. Des. 59, 160164 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, L.W.F. and Pekguleryuz, M.O.: The recrystallization and texture of magnesium–zinc–cerium alloys. Scr. Mater. 59, 665668 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chino, Y., Sassa, K., and Mabuchi, M.: Texture and stretch formability of Mg-1.5 mass%Zn-0.2 mass%Ce alloy rolled at different rolling temperatures. Mater. Trans. 49, 29162918 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yan, H., Chen, R.S., and Han, E.H.: A comparative study of texture and ductility of Mg–1.2Zn–0.8Gd alloy fabricated by rolling and equal channel angular extrusion. Mater. Charact. 62, 321326 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar