Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:39:34.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microstructural evolution and mechanical properties of Si3N4–SiC (nanoparticle)–Si3N4 (whisker) composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Young-Hag Koh
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, 151-742, Korea
Hae-Won Kim
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, 151-742, Korea
Hyoun-Ee Kim
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, 151-742, Korea
Get access

Abstract

The effects of SiC-nanoparticle and Si3N4-whisker additions on the microstructural evolution and mechanical properties of Si3N4 were investigated. The addition of SiC nanoparticles suppressed Si3N4 grain growth, leading to an improvement in the flexural strength. On the other hand, Si3N4 whiskers in the specimen promoted the formation of large elongated grains, which were found to be beneficial to the fracture toughness of the material. When both SiC nanoparticles and Si3N4 whiskers were added concurrently, large grains were formed in fine matrix grains. The microstructure of Si3N4 was controlled by adjusting the relative concentrations of SiC nanoparticles and the Si3N4 whiskers added. These compositional and microstructural variations of the Si3N4 had significant influence on the mechanical properties, such as strength, fracture toughness, R-curve behavior, and high-temperature strength.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Pyzik, A.J. and Beaman, D.R., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 76, 2737 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Park, D-S., Lee, S-Y., Kim, H-D., Yoo, B.J., and Kim, B-A., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 81, 1876 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Lee, C.J., Kim, D.J., and Kang, E.S., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 82, 753 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Lee, S.K., Lee, K.S., Lawn, B.R., and Kim, D.K., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 81, 2061 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Becher, P.F. and Wei, G.C., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 67, C267 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Pezzotti, G., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 76, 1313 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Becher, P.F., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74, 255 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Dusza, B.J. and Šajgalík, P., J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 9, 9 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Hirao, K., Nagaoka, T., Brito, M.E., and Kanzaki, S., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 77, 1857 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Park, D-S. and Kim, C-W., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 82, 780 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Sternitzke, M., J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 17, 1061 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Hermann, M. and Schuber, C., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 81, 1095 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Park, H., Kim, H-E., and Niihara, K., J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 18, 907 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Chou, Y-S. and Green, D.J., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 76, 1452 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Chantikul, P., Anstis, G.R., Lawn, B.R., and Marshall, D.B., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 64, 539 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Choi, B-J., Koh, Y-H. and Kim, H-E., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 81, 2725 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Kim, Y.W., Mitomo, M., and Hirosaki, N., J. Mater. Sci. 30, 5178 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Choi, B-J. and Kim, H-E., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 81, 2191 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Krause, R.F. Jr, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 71, 338 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar