Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T21:17:24.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Micrometer-scale synchrotron diffraction mapping analysis of carbide precipitation in deep cryogenically treated low carbon steel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2012

Ning Xu ,
Giuseppe P. Cavallaro  and
Andrea R. Gerson
Ning Xu
Affiliation:
Minerals and Materials Science & Technology, Mawson Institute, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, South Australia, 5095, Australia
Giuseppe P. Cavallaro
Affiliation:
Minerals and Materials Science & Technology, Mawson Institute, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, South Australia, 5095, Australia
Andrea R. Gerson*
Affiliation:
Minerals and Materials Science & Technology, Mawson Institute, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, South Australia, 5095, Australia
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Carbide precipitation within low carbon AISI H13 hot work tool steel that had either been quenched at 80 °C or cryogenically treated at −196 °C prior to tempering has been examined using micrometer-scale synchrotron diffraction mapping. Vanadium-rich cubic M8C7 carbide, lattice parameter of approximately 0.8610 nm, not identifiable using laboratory powder x-ray diffraction (PXRD), was found to be present in all samples. The concentration of this phase was greatest in the rapidly cooled cryogenically treated sample. However, all cryogenic treatments resulted in greater carbide concentrations than in the quenched sample. In addition rapid cryogenic cooling by immersion in liquid nitrogen (N2), as compared with slow cooling to −196 °C over a 3 h duration, results in greater order within the carbide phase subsequent to tempering, as interpreted by analysis of unit cell size variation, and the smallest stress, as interpreted by diffraction peak full width half maximum height distributions.

Keywords

synchrotron microdiffractioncryogenic treatmentcarbidessteelsmicrostructure
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 27 , Issue 16 , 28 August 2012 , pp. 2122 - 2130
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Collins, D.N.: Deep cryogenic treatment of tool steels: A review. Heat Treat. Met. 2, 40–42 (1996).Google Scholar
2.Barron, R.F.: Cryogenic treatment of metals to improve wear resistance. Cryogenics 22, 409–413 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Dhar, N.R., Paul, S., and Chattopadhyay, A.B.: The influence of cryogenic cooling on tool wear, dimensional accuracy and surface finish in turning AISI 1040 and E4340C steels. Wear 249, 932–942 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Mohan Lal, D., Renganarayanan, S., and Kalanidhi, A.: Cryogenic treatment to augment wear resistance of tool and die steels. Cryogenics 41, 149–155 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Moore, K. and Collins, D.N.: Cryogenic treatment of three heat-treated tool steels. Key Eng. Mater. 86–87, 47–54 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Rhyim, Y-M., Han, S-H., Na, Y-S., and Lee, J-H.: Effect of deep cryogenic treatment on carbide precipitation and mechanical properties of tool steel. Solid State Phenomena 118, 9–14 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Huang, J.Y., Zhu, Y.T., Liao, X.Z., Beyerlein, I.J., Bourke, M.A., and Mitchell, T.E.: Microstructure of cryogenic treated M2 tool steel. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 339, 241–244 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Pellizzari, M., Molinari, A., Gialanella, S., and Straffelini, G.: Effect of deep cryogenic treatment on the microstructural properties of AISI H13 steel. Metallurgia Italiana 93, 21 (2001).Google Scholar
9.Firouzdor, V., Nejati, E., and Khomamizadeh, F.: Effect of deep cryogenic treatment on wear resistance and tool life of M2 HSS drill. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 206, 467–472 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Akhbarizadeh, A., Shafyei, A., and Golozar, M.A.: Effects of cryogenic treatment on wear behavior of D6 tool steel. Mater. Des. 30, 3259–3264 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Bensely, A., Prabhakaran, A., Mohan Lal, D., and Nagarajan, G.: Enhancing the wear resistance of case carburized steel (En 353) by cryogenic treatment. Cryogenics 45, 747–754 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Das, D., Dutta, A.K., and Ray, K.K.: Influence of varied cryotreatment on the wear behavior of AISI D2 steel. Wear 266, 297–309 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Stratton, P. and Graf, M.: The effect of deep cold induced nanocarbides on the wear of case hardened components, Cryogenics 49, 346–349 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Krauss, G.: Steels: Heat Treatment and Processing Principles.(ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1995).Google Scholar
15.Roberts, G.A. and Cary, R.A.: Tool Steels, American Society for Metals (Beachwood, OH, 1980).Google Scholar
16.Llewellyn, D.T.: Steels: Metallurgy and Applications (Butterworth Heinemann, Boston, MA, 1992).Google Scholar
17.Xu, N., Cavallaro, G.P., and Gerson, A.R.: Synchrotron microdiffraction analysis of the microstructure of cryogenically treated high performance tool steels prior to and after tempering. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 527, 6822–6830 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Hu, X.B., Zhang, M., Wu, X.C., and Li, L.: Simulations of coarsening behavior for M23C6 carbides in AISI H13 steel. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 22, 153–158 (2006).Google Scholar
19.Lipatnikov, V.N., Gusev, A.I., Ettmayer, P., and Lengauer, W.: Phase transformation in nonstoichiometric vanadium carbide. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 11, 163–184 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Tsakalakos, T., Ovid’ko, L.A., and Vasudevan, A.K.: Nanostructures: Synthesis, Functional Properties and Applications (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Dinnebier, R.E. and Billinge, S.J.L.: Powder Diffraction: Theory and Practice (Royal Society of Chemistry, London, UK, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Ungár, T.: Strain broadening caused by dislocations. Mater. Sci. Forum 278–281, 151–157 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Rzychoñ, T. and Rodak, K.: Microstructure characterization of deformed copper by XRD line broadening. Arch. Mater. Sci. Eng. 28, 605–608 (2007).Google Scholar
24.Langford, J.I. and Wilson, A.J.C.: Scherrer after sixty years: A survey and some new results in the determination of crystallite size. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 11, 102–113 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar