Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T18:51:55.111Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mechanically induced reaction between alkaline earth metal oxides and TiO2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

N. J. Welham
N. J. Welham
Affiliation:
Department of Electronic Materials Engineering, Research School of Physical Sciences and Engineering, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 0200, 0200 Australia
Get access

Abstract

This paper outlines the formation of alkaline earth metal titanates, of the general formula MTiO3, directly from the metal oxides and rutile by mechanical activation in a laboratory ball mill at room temperature. X-ray diffraction analysis showed that the reaction was essentially complete within 100 h for all metals except magnesium. The titanates formed all had a Scherrer crystallite size of 11–12 nm and a lattice strain of 0.5–0.6%, neither of which were affected by extended milling. Annealing studies confirmed that the titanate was formed during milling and showed that grain growth could be achieved at temperatures below that generally used for their formation. Mixed cation titanates could also be formed by milling, but tended to be barium rich until annealed.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 13 , Issue 6 , June 1998 , pp. 1607 - 1613
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Jaffe, B., Cook, W. R., and Jaffe, H., Piezoelectric Ceramics (Academic Press, London, 1971), p. 60.Google Scholar
2.Everson, G. F., in Speciality Inorganic Chemicals, edited by Thompson, R. (Special Publication 40, Royal Society of Chemistry, London, 1981), p. 226.Google Scholar
3.Yanovskaya, M. I., Golubko, N. V., and Nenasheva, E. A., Inorg. Mat. 32, 200 (1996).Google Scholar
4.Zabicky, J., Zingerman, D., Shneck, R., and Manor, E., Nanostructured Mat. 7, 527 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Liao, J. and Senna, M., Mater. Res. Bull. 30, 385 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Pfaff, G., Ceram. Int. 20, 111 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Hamada, K., Isobe, T., and Senna, M., J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 15, 603 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Balaz, P., Sepelak, P., Briancin, J., Medvecky, L., and Bastl, Z., J. Mater. Sci. 29, 4847 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Hamada, K. and Senna, M., J. Mater. Sci. 31, 1725 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Welham, N. J., Proc. AusIMM (1998).Google Scholar
11.Welham, N. J., Minerals Eng. 9, 1189–1200 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Welham, N. J., CIM Bull. 90 (1007), 64–68 (1997).Google Scholar
13.Duval, C., Inorganic Thermogravimetric Analysis, 2nd ed. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1963), pp. 214, 270, 437, 528.Google Scholar
14.Radlinski, A. P. and Calka, A., Mater. Sci. Eng. A134, 1376 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Klug, H. P. and Alexander, L. E., X-Ray Diffraction Procedures (Wiley, New York, 1954), p. 36.Google Scholar
16.Warren, B. E., X-Ray Diffraction (Dover, New York, 1990), p. 253.Google Scholar
17.Welham, N. J., Minerals Eng. (1998).Google Scholar
18.Eckert, J., Schultz, L., Hellstern, E., and Urbain, K., J. Appl. Phys. 64, 3224 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Miller, P. J., Coffey, C. S., and Devost, V. F., J. Appl. Phys. 59, 913 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Tkacova, K., Mechanical Activation of Minerals (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1989), pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
21.Maurice, D. and Courtenay, T. H., Metall. Trans. A 27, 1981 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar