Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T08:34:33.913Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mechanical properties of Zr57Nb5Al10Cu15.4Ni12.6 metallic glass matrix particulate composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

R. D. Conner
Affiliation:
W.M. Keck Laboratory of Engineering Materials, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125
H. Choi-Yim
Affiliation:
W.M. Keck Laboratory of Engineering Materials, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125
W. L. Johnson
Affiliation:
W.M. Keck Laboratory of Engineering Materials, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125
Get access

Abstract

To increase the toughness of a metallic glass with the nominal composition Zr57Nb5Al10Cu15.4Ni12.6, it was used as the matrix in particulate composites reinforced with W, WC, Ta, and SiC. The composites were tested in compression and tension experiments. Compressive strain to failure increased by more than 300% compared with the unreinforced Zr57Nb5Al10Cu15.4Ni12.6, and energy to break of the tensile samples increased by more than 50%. The increase in toughness came from the particles restricting shear band propagation, promoting the generation of multiple shear bands and additional fracture surface area. There was direct evidence of viscous flow of the metallic glass matrix within the confines of the shear bands.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Klement, K., Willens, R.H., and Duwez, P., Nature 187, 869 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Peker, A. and Johnson, W.L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 63, 2342 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Bruck, H.A., Christman, T., Rosakis, A.J., and Johnson, W.L., Scripta Metallurg. Mater. 30, 429 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Inoue, A., Shibata, T., and Zhang, T., Mater. Trans. JIM 36(12), 1420 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Green, D.J., Nicholson, P.S., and Embury, D.J., J. Mater. Sci. 14, 1413 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Krstic, V.V., Nicholson, P.S., and Hoagland, R.G., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 64(9), 499 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Baran, G., Degrange, M., Roques-Carmes, C., and Wehbe, D., J. Mater. Sci. 25, 4211 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Vaidya, R.U. and Subramanian, K.N., SAMPE J. 29(4), 26 (1993).Google Scholar
9.Kato, H. and Inoue, A., JIM 38(9), 793 (1997).Google Scholar
10.Choi-Yim, H. and Johnson, W.L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 71(26), 3808 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Eshelby, J.D., Proc. R. Soc. London A241, 376 (1957).Google Scholar
12.Eshelby, J.D., Progress in Solid Mechanics, edited by Sneddon, I.N. and Hill, R., 89 (North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam 1961).Google Scholar
13.Lin, X. and Choi-Yim, H. (unpublished).Google Scholar
14.Hasselman, D.P.H. and Fulrath, R.M., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 48(10), 548 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Lin, X., Ph.D. Thesis, California Institute of Technology (1997).Google Scholar
16.Sigl, L.S., Mataga, P.A., Dalgleish, B.J., McMeeking, R.M., and Evans, A.G., Acta Metall. 36(4), 945 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Pampillo, C.A. and Reimschuessel, A.C., J. Mater. Sci. 9, 718 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Forwood, C.T. and Forty, A.J., Philos. Mag. 11(113), 1067 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Bruck, H.A., Ph.D. Thesis, California Institute of Technology (1995).Google Scholar
20.Troczynski, T.B., Nicholson, P.S., and Rucker, C.E., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 71(5), C276 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Fractography of Ceramic and Metal Failures, edited by J.J. Mecholsky, Jr and S.R. Powell, Jr, ASTM STP 827, 7, American Society for Testing and Materials Philadelphia (1982).Google Scholar
22.Leng, Y. and Courtney, T.H., Metall. Trans. A 21A, 2159 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar