Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T00:28:53.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mechanical properties of T23 steel welded joints without post-weld heat treatment for fossil fired boilers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2016

Xue Wang ,
Yong Li ,
Huijun Li ,
Chao Yang  and
Qing-xu Yang
Xue Wang*
Affiliation:
School of Power and Mechanics, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
Yong Li
Affiliation:
School of Power and Mechanics, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
Huijun Li
Affiliation:
Faculty of Engineering and Information Sciences, University of Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
Chao Yang
Affiliation:
Jiangsu Frontier Electric Technology Co., Ltd., Nanjing 211102, China
Qing-xu Yang
Affiliation:
Jiangsu Frontier Electric Technology Co., Ltd., Nanjing 211102, China
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Microstructures of new heat-resistant steel grade T23 welded joint without PWHT and its corresponding mechanical properties including creep were investigated to clarify its premature failure mechanisms in the large water wall panel of the advanced power plant boiler. The results show that the T23 steel GTAW welded joint in a wall thickness of 6.5 mm without PWHT exhibits high tensile strength, good ductility, and sufficient impact toughness, while the hardness of the WM is higher than the maximum permitted value of 350 HV due to the large amount of un-tempered martensite formed during the cooling process of welding. This WM in as-welded condition has higher creep rupture strength but poorer rupture ductility than the tempered BM. Poor rupture ductility taken place in the WM results from inter-granular cracking during creep exposure and is not related to the second hardening because no hardness rise occurs in the fractured WM compared with as-welded condition. The paper does not specifically investigate the effect of service exposure but simulates the failure of WM by a creep test. The main point is that the WM has low creep ductility, especially at a stress concentration.

Keywords

microstructureweldingsteel
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 31 , Issue 24 , 28 December 2016 , pp. 4000 - 4008
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Masuyama, F., Yokoyama, T., Sawaragi, Y., and Iseda, A.: Development of a tungsten strengthened low alloy steel with improved weldability. Proc. Mater. Adv. Power Eng. Pt. I, 173 (1994).Google Scholar
Miyata, K. and Sawaragi, Y.: Effect of Mo and W on the phase stability of precipitation in low Cr heat resistant steels. ISIJ Int. 41, 281 (2001).Google Scholar
Arndt, J., Haarmann, K., Kottmann, G., Vaillant, J.C., Bendick, W., Kubla, K., Arbab, A., and Deshayes, F.: The T23/T24 Book (Vallourec & Mannesmann Tubes, Houston, 2000).Google Scholar
Bendick, W., Gabrel, J., Hahn, B., and Vandenberghe, B.: New low alloy heat resistant ferritic steels T/P23 and T/P24 for power plant application. Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping 84, 13 (2007).Google Scholar
Ji, X.W., Duan, P., Li, J., Zhang, J.Y., and Gu, Y.P.: Application of T23 steel to 1000 MW ultra-supercritical units. East China Electr. Power 37, 2097 (2009).Google Scholar
Wang, X., Li, X.Q., Yang, C., Ge, Z.X., Yang, X.B., and Ren, Y.Y.: Analysis on early stage of welded T23 steel waterwall in USC tower boilers. China Electr. Power 47, 21 (2014).Google Scholar
Nowack, R., Götte, C., and Heckmann, S.: Quality management at RWE using T24 boiler material as an example. VGB PowerTech 91, 1 (2011).Google Scholar
Zeman, M., Łomozik, M., and Brózda, J.: Problems with welding steel T24 intended for membrane walls of boilers. Weld. Int. 28, 831 (2014).Google Scholar
Reich, M., Kessler, O., Bader, M., and Oehmigen, H-G.: Microstructure investigation of post weld heat treatment for the high-temperature steel 24. In Proceedings of 3th International ECCC Creep of Fracture Conference, Rome, May 5–7, 2014.Google Scholar
Komai, N., Masuyama, F., and Igarashi, M.: 10-year experience with T23 (2.25Cr–1.6W) and T122 (12Cr–0.4Mo–2W) in a power boiler. Trans. ASME 127, 190 (2005).Google Scholar
Dhooge, A. and Vekeman, J.: New generation and 2.25Cr steels T/P23 and T/P24 weldability and high temperature properties. Weld. World 49, 75 (2005).Google Scholar
Vallourec Publication: Pipe steels for modern high-output power plants. Available at: http://www.vallourec.com/fossilpower/Lists/Brochures/Attachments/7/V_B01B0005B-15GB.pdf.Google Scholar
Mohyla, P. and Foldyna, V.: Improvement of reliability and creep resistant in advanced low-alloy steels. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 510, 234 (2009).Google Scholar