Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T23:41:39.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kinetics of B2, DO3, and B32 ordering: Results from pair approximation calculations and Monte Carlo simulations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

L. Anthony  and
B. Fultz
L. Anthony
Affiliation:
W. M. Keck Laboratories of Engineering Materials 138-78, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125
B. Fultz
Affiliation:
W. M. Keck Laboratories of Engineering Materials 138-78, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125
Get access

Abstract

A kinetic theory of ordering based on the path probability method was implemented in the pair (Bethe) approximation and used to study the kinetics of short- and long-range ordering in alloys with equilibrium states of B2, DO3, or B32 order. The theory was developed in a superposition approximation for a vacancy mechanism on a bcc lattice with first- (1nn) and second-nearest neighbor (2nn) pair interactions. Chained 1nn conditional probabilities were used to account for the entropy of 2nn pair configurations. Monte Carlo simulations of ordering were also performed and their results compared to predictions of the pair approximation. Comparisons are also made with predictions from an earlier kinetic theory implemented in the point (Bragg-Williams) approximation. For all three calculations (point, pair, and Monte Carlo), critical temperatures for B2 and DO3 ordering are reported for different 1nn and 2nn interaction strengths. The influence of annealing temperature on the kinetic paths through the space of B2, DO3, and B32 order parameters was found to be strong when the thermodynamic preferences for the ordered states were of similar strengths. Transient states of intermediate order were also studied. A transient formation of B32 order in an AB3 alloy was found when 2nn interactions were strong, even when B32 order was neither a Richards-Allen-Cahn ground state nor a stable equilibrium state at that temperature. The formation of this transient B32 order can be argued consistently from a thermodynamic perspective. However, a second example of transient B2 order in an AB alloy with equilibrium B32 order cannot be explained by the same thermodynamic argument, and we believe that its origin is primarily kinetic.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , February 1994 , pp. 348 - 356
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Anthony, L. and Fultz, B., J. Mater. Res. 4, 1132 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Anthony, L. and Fultz, B., J. Mater. Res. 4, 1140 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Fultz, B., J. Chem. Phys. 87, 1604 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Fultz, B., J. Chem. Phys. 88, 3227 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Fultz, B. and Anthony, L., in Diffusion in High Technology Materials, edited by Gupta, D., Romig, A. D. Jr., and Dayananda, M. A. (The Metallurgical Society, Warrendale, PA, 1988).Google Scholar
6.Fultz, B. and Anthony, L., Philos. Mag. Lett. 59, 237 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Ouyang, H. and Fultz, B., J. Appl. Phys. 66, 4752 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Anthony, L. and Fultz, B., in Alloy Phase Stability and Design, edited by Stocks, G. M., Pope, D.P., and Giamei, A. F. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 186, Pittsburgh, PA, 1991), p. 181.Google Scholar
9.Richards, M.J. and Cahn, J.W., Acta Metall. 19, 1263 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Allen, S. M. and Cahn, J. W., Acta Metall. 20, 423 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Gao, Z.Q. and Fultz, B., Philos. Mag. B 67, 787 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Fultz, B., Philos. Mag. B 67, 253 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Kikuchi, R., Ann. Phys. 10, 127 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Kikuchi, R., Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 35, 1 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Sato, H. and Kikuchi, R., Acta Metall. 24, 797 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Gschwend, K., Sato, H., and Kikuchi, R., J. Chem. Phys. 69, 5006 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. It is straightforward to extend the derivation to ternary and quaternary alloys.Google Scholar
18. One of the sites on the y sublattice is the soon-to-be-occupied vacancy.Google Scholar
19. It is not necessary to work with the (t, t + Δt) path variables in order to compute the (t) state variables. The (t) point state variables can more conveniently be obtained from the (f) pair state variables.Google Scholar
20.Warren, B. E., X-ray Diffraction (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1969), Sec. 12.3.Google Scholar
21. Since the AB (1:1) stoichiometry is not conducive to the formation of D03 order, we are able to identify the (1/2 1/2 1/2) peak with the presence of B32 order and the (100) peak with the presence of B2 order without any ambiguity.Google Scholar
22.Khachaturyan, A.G., Phys. Status Solidi B 60, 9 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Fontaine, D. de, Acta Metall. 23, 553 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar