Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T01:42:20.947Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ion beam mixing study on Cu/Al2O3 bilayer samples using Rutherford backscattering spectrometry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

A.G. Balogh
Affiliation:
Hann-Meitner-Institut, Berlin, Germany
M-P. Macht
Affiliation:
Hann-Meitner-Institut, Berlin, Germany
V. Naundorf
Affiliation:
Hann-Meitner-Institut, Berlin, Germany
Get access

Abstract

Cu/Al2O3 bilayer samples were produced by vapor deposition and irradiated successively with 150 keV Ar ions up to a dose of 500 dpa. Ion beam mixing effects were studied by 2 Me V He+ Rutherford backscattering spectroscopy (RBS). Concentration depth profiles show the mixing of Cu, Al, and O atoms in the sample. Because of the low mixing efficiency found in this study, Al2O3-dispersion strengthened Cu alloys seem to be good candidates as structural materials in fusion reactors.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Brager, H. A., Heinisch, H. L., and Garner, F. A., J. Nucl. Mater. 133–134, 676 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Wanderka, N., Yuan, Y., Jiao, L., Wahi, R. P., and Wollenberger, H., in Proc. Int. Conf. on Fusion Reactor Materials, Nov. 17–21, Florida (1991).Google Scholar
3Ziegler, J. F., Biersack, J. P., and Littmark, U., The Stopping and Range of Ions in Solids, edited by Ziegler, J. F. (Pergamon Press, New York, 1985).Google Scholar
4Doolittle, L. R., Nucl. Instrum. Methods. B 9, 344 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Matsunami, N., Yamamura, Y., Itikawa, Y., Itoh, N., Kazumata, Y., Migyagawa, S., Morita, K., Shimizu, R., and Tawara, H., IPPJAM-32, Institute of Plasma Physics, Nagoya University, Nagoya (1983).Google Scholar
6Paine, B. M. and Averback, R. S., Nucl. Instrum. Methods B7/8, 666 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Barcz, A. J. and Nicolet, M-A., Appl. Phys. A 33, 167 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Mantl, S., Rehn, L. E., Averback, R. S., and Thompson, L. J., Nucl. Instrum. Methods B7/8, 622 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Macht, M-P., Miiller, A., Naundorf, V., and Wollenberger, H., Phys. Status Solidi A 104, 287 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Wollenberger, H. J., in Physical Metallurgy, edited by Cahnand, R. W.Haasen, P. (Elsevier Science Publishers, New York, 1983).Google Scholar
11Sizmann, R., J. Nucl. Mater. 69–70, 386 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar