Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T08:17:41.834Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interfacial microstructure formed by reactive metal penetration of Al into mullite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

P. Lu
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, New Mexico 87801
T. B. Du
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, New Mexico 87801
R. E. Loehman
Affiliation:
Advanced Materials Laboratory, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque New Mexico 87106
K. G. Ewsuk
Affiliation:
Advanced Materials Laboratory, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque New Mexico 87106
W. G. Fahrenholtz
Affiliation:
Advanced Materials Laboratory, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque New Mexico 87106
Get access

Abstract

Microstructures in the reaction interface between molten Al and dense mullite have been studied by transmission electron microscopy to provide insight into mechanisms for forming ceramic–metal composites by reactive metal penetration. The reactions, which have the overall stoichiometry 3Al6Si2O13 + (8 + x)Al → 13Al2O3 + xAl + 6Si, were carried out at temperatures of 900, 1100, and 1200 °C for 5 and 60 min and 1400 °C for 15 min. Observed phases generally were those given in the above reaction; their proportions and interfacial microstructures, however, were strongly dependent on the reaction temperature. Using previously measured reaction kinetics data, the observed temperature dependence of the interfacial microstructure has been modeled as three sequential steps, each of which is rate limiting in a different temperature range.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Loehman, R.E., Acta Metall. Mater. 31, 965 (1994).Google Scholar
2.Loehman, R.E. and Tomsia, A.P., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 77, 271 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Koczak, M.J. and Premkumar, M.K., J. Metals 4448 (1993).Google Scholar
4.Nagelberg, A.S., in Processing Science of Advanced Ceramics, edited by Aksay, I.A., McVay, G.L., and Ulrich, D.R. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 155, Pittsburgh, PA, 1989), pp. 275282.Google Scholar
5.Loehman, R.E. and Tomsia, A.P., Acta Metall. Mater. 40, S75 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.van Loo, F.J.J., Prog. Solid State Chem. 20, 47 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Loehman, R.E., Ewsuk, K., and Tomsia, A.P., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 79, 27 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Fahrenholtz, W.G., Ewsuk, K., Loehman, R.E., and Tomsia, A.P., in In Situ Reactions for Synthesis of Composites, Ceramics, and Intermetallics, edited by Barrera, E.V., Fishman, S.G., Marquis, F.D.S, Thadhani, N.N., Frazier, W.E., and Munir, Z.A. (1995), pp. 99109.Google Scholar
9.Fahrenholtz, W.G., Ellerby, D.T., Ewsuk, K.G., and Loehman, R.E. (unpublished).Google Scholar
10.Antolin, S., Nagelberg, A.S., and Creber, D.K., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 75, 447 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Breval, E., Aghajanian, M.K., and Luszcz, S.J., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73, 2610 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Gao, Y., Jia, J., Loehman, R.E., and Ewsuk, K.K., J. Mater. Res. 10, 1216 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Fahrenholtz, W.G., Ewsuk, K., Loehman, R.E., and Lu, P., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 81, 2533–41 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Saiz, E. and Tomsia, A.P., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 81(9), 23812393 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Lou, V.L.K, Mitchell, T.E., and Heuer, A.H., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 68(2), 4958 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar