Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-28T06:44:41.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of strain rate on laterally confined concrete columns subjected to cyclic loading

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

S.H. Perry ,
A.H. Al-Shaikh  and
H.K. Cheong
S.H. Perry
Affiliation:
Imperial College of Science and Technology, Department of Civil Engineering, London, SW7 2BU, United Kingdom
A.H. Al-Shaikh
Affiliation:
Imperial College of Science and Technology, Department of Civil Engineering, London, SW7 2BU, United Kingdom
H.K. Cheong
Affiliation:
Imperial College of Science and Technology, Department of Civil Engineering, London, SW7 2BU, United Kingdom
Get access

Abstract

This paper describes the effect of cyclic loading upon the compressive strength, the stress-strain relationship, and the energy absorption and dissipation characteristics of short concrete columns (stub columns) at various slow strain rates. Comparison is made with columns loaded monotonically at similar strain rates. The columns were confined laterally by high-tensile steel bolts, inserted horizontally in two orthogonal directions through preformed ducts; the annular space between ducts and bolts was grouted with high-strength epoxy resin. Both steel and concrete deformational response was measured. Significant enhancement of the strength and ductility of the concrete was obtained. Columns displayed large energy absorption and dissipation capacity under cyclic loading. The validity of an envelope curve to describe cyclic behavior is discussed.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , April 1986 , pp. 382 - 389
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Dilger, W. H., Koch, R., and Kowalczyk, R., J. Am. Concr. Inst. 81, 73 (1984).Google Scholar
2Watstein, D., J. Am. Concr. Inst. 49, 729 (1953).Google Scholar
3Jones, P. G. and Richart, F. E., Proc. Am. Soc. Test. Met. 36, Part II, 380 (1956).Google Scholar
4Mahin, S. A. and Bertero, V. V., EERC Report No. 72–9, University of California, Berkeley (1972).Google Scholar
5Perry, S. H., Cheong, H. K., and Armstrong, W. E., in 4th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, 1983 (University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 1983), pp. 92–101.Google Scholar
6Cheong, H. K. and Perry, S. H., in RILEM/CEB International Conference on Concrete under Multiaxial Conditions, Toulouse, 1984 (Presses de l'Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, 1984), pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
7Cheong, H. K., Al-Shaikh, A. H., Ambraseys, N. N., and Perry, S. H., in Joint I. Struct. E./B.R.E. Seminar, Design of Concrete Structures (Elsevier, London, 1985), pp. 59–67.Google Scholar
8Sinha, B. B., Gerstle, K. H., and Tulin, L. G., J. Am. Concr. Inst. 61, 195 (1964).Google Scholar
9Karsan, J. D. and Jirsa, J. O., J. Struct. Div. Am. Soc. Civil Engrs. 95, 2543 (1969).Google Scholar
10Shah, S. P., Fafltis, A., and Arnold, R., J. Struct. Div. Am. Soc. Civil Engrs. 109, 1695 (1983).Google Scholar
11Bresler, B. and Bertero, V. V., in 2nd Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Hamilton, 1975 (University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 1975), pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
12Armstrong, W. E. and Perry, S. H., Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 400, 127 (1985).Google Scholar