Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T17:01:28.004Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of drying temperature on the close packed structure of silanized monolayers deposited on indium tin oxide (ITO) substrates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2011

Stefano D’Elia ,
Valentin Barna ,
Nicola Scaramuzza ,
Giuseppe Strangi  and
Roberto Bartolino
Stefano D’Elia
Affiliation:
INFM-CNR-LICRYL Laboratory and CEMIF.CAL, Department of Physics, University of Calabria, Rende (CS), I-87036 Italy
Valentin Barna
Affiliation:
Faculty of Physics, University of Bucharest, 077125 Bucharest, Romania
Nicola Scaramuzza*
Affiliation:
INFM-CNR-LICRYL Laboratory and CEMIF.CAL, Department of Physics, University of Calabria, Rende (CS), I-87036 Italy
Roberto Bartolino
Affiliation:
INFM-CNR-LICRYL Laboratory and CEMIF.CAL, Department of Physics, University of Calabria, Rende (CS), I-87036 Italy
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Molecular organization of self-assembled n-dimethyl-n-octadecyl-3-aminopropyltrimethoxysilychloride (DMOAP) layers on indium tin oxide (ITO) coated glass substrates was thoroughly investigated. The layer thickness for each deposition was determined by variable angle spectroscopic ellipsometry (VASE), while from static contact-angle measurements we deduced valuable information regarding the ordering of the molecular structures at the solid-air interface. In particular, the DMOAP thin film formation was studied for two different drying temperatures (85 °C and 120 °C). While at Tdrying = 85 °C we observed the formation of a molecular monolayer characterized by a close packed structure, at the higher temperature the DMOAP molecules “bend” at the substrate as they stack in relatively disordered clusters. A qualitative interpretation of this phenomenon is given, in good agreement both with the obtained experimental data and experimental investigation reported in the scientific literature. The observations regarding the DMOAP molecular level organization as a function of substrate temperature could bring essential information to the self assembly research community and also explain some important physical phenomena occurring at interfaces.

Keywords

CoatingOptical propertiesThin film
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 24 , Issue 9 , September 2009 , pp. 2784 - 2794
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Petty, M.C.: Langmuir-Blodgett Films. An Introduction (–Cam-bridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Ulman, A.: An Introduction to Ultrathin Organic Films from Langmuir-Blodgett to Self-Assembly (Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1991).Google Scholar
3Blinov, L.M. and Chigrinov, V.G.: ElectroOptic Effects in Liquid Crystal Materials (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Huang, J.H., Superfine, R. and Shen, Y.R.: Nonlinear spectroscopic study of coadsorbed liquid-crystal and surfactant monolayers: Conformation and interaction. Phys. Rev. A 42(6), 3660 (1990)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Drawhorn, R.A. and Abbott, N.L.: Anchoring of nematic liquid crystals on self-assembled monolayers formed from alkanethiols on semitransparent films of gold. J. Phys. Chem. 99, 16511 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Fonseca, J.G., Hommet, J. and Galerne, Y.: Surface structure and anchoring properties of modified self-assembled monolayers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 82(1), 58 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Huie, J.C.: Guided molecular self-assembly: A review of recent efforts. Smart Mater. Struct. 12, 264 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Smith, R.K., Lewis, P.A. and Weiss, P.S.: Review—Patterning self-assembled monolayers. Prog. Surf. Sci. 75, 1 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Anderson, M.E., Srnivasan, C., Hohman, J.N., Carter, E.M., Horn, M.W. and Weiss, P.S.: Combining conventional lithography with molecular self-assembly for chemical patterning. Adv. Mater. 18, 3258 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Ulman, A.: Formation and structure of self-assembled mono-layers. Chem. Rev. 96, 1533 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Bigelow, W.C., Pickett, D.L. and Zisman, W.A.: Oleophobic monolayers I. Films adsorbed from solution in non-polar liquids. J. Colloid Sci. 1, 513 (1946)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Nakajima, A., Hashimoto, K., Watanabe, T., Takai, K., Yamauchi, G. and Fujishima, A.: Transparent superhydrophobic thin films with self-cleaning properties. Langmuir 16, 7044 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Brzoska, J.B., Shahidzadeh, N. and Rondelez, F.: Evidence of a transition temperature for the optimum deposition of grafted monolayer coatings. Nature 360, 719 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14McGovern, M.E., Kallury, K.M.R. and Thompson, M.: Role of solvent on the silanization of glass with octadecyltrichlorosilane. Langmuir 10, 3607 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Silberzan, P., Léger, L., Ausserré, D. and Benattar, J.J.: Silanation of silica surfaces. A new method of constructing pure or mixed monolayers. Langmuir 7, 1647 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Brzoska, J.B., Azouz, I.B. and Rondelez, F.: Silanization of solid substrates: A step toward reproducibility. Langmuir 10, 4367 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Liu, Y., Wolf, L.K. and Messmer, M.C.: A study of alkyl chain conformational changes in self-assembled n-octadecyltrichlorosi-lane monolayers on fused silica surfaces. Langmuir 17, 4329 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Davidovits, J.V., Pho, V., Silberzan, P. and Goldmann, M.: Temperature influence on the formation of silanized monolayers on silica: An atomic force microscopy study. Surf. Sci. 352–354, 369 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Fadeev, A.Y. and McCarthy, T.J.: Self-assembly is not the only reaction between alkyltrichlorosilanes and surfaces: Monomolecular and oligomeric covalently attached layers of dichloro and trichloroalkylsilanes on silicon. Langmuir 16, 7268 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Lelidis, I. and Oedman, C.: Influence of substrate nature and growth conditions on the morphology of thin DMOAP films. Liq. Cryst. 30(6), 643 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Gupta, V.K. and Abbot, N.L.: Azimuthal anchoring transition of nematic liquid crystals on self-assembled monolayers formed from odd and even alkanethiols. Phys. Rev. E 54(5), R4540 (1996).Google ScholarPubMed
22Vena, C., Versace, C., Strangi, G., DéElia, S. and Bartolino, R.: Light depolarization effects during Fréedericksz transition. Opt. Express 15(25), 17063 (2007)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Bain, C.D., Troughton, E.B., Yu-Tai, T., Evall, J., Whitesides, G.M. and Nuzzo, R.G.: Formation of monolayer films by the spontaneous assembly of organic thiols from solution onto gold. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 111, 321 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Almanza-Workman, A.M., Raghavan, S., Petrovic, S., Gogoi, B., Deymier, P., Monk, D.J. and Roop, R.: Characterization of highly hydrophobic coatings deposited onto pre-oxidized silicon from water dispersible organosilanes. Thin Solid Films 423, 77 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25Gennes, P.G. de: Wetting: Static and dynamics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 57(3) (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26Decker, E.L. and Garoff, S.: Contact line structure and dynamics on surfaces with contact angle hysteresis. Langmuir 13, 6321 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27Cassie, A.B.D.: Contact angles. Discuss. Faraday Soc. 75, 5041 (1952)Google Scholar
28Israelachvili, J.N. and Gee, M.L.: Contact angles on chemically heterogeneous surfaces. Langmuir 5, 288 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29Genell Med auf Floarglas—Balzers Thin Films Prod: ID. BD051149, BATCH 1400-655-(1999).Google Scholar
30DéElia, S., Castriota, M., Policicchio, A., Versace, C., Scaramuzza, N., Agostino, R.G., Cazzanelli, E., Vena, C., Strangi, G. and Bartolino, R.: Thermally induced modifications of the optic properties of lead zirconate titanate thin films obtained on different substrates by sol-gel synthesis. J. Appl. Phys. 104, 123522 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31DéElia, S., Ciuchi, F., Versace, C., Scaramuzza, N., Strangi, G. and Bartolino, R.: Ellipsometry investigation of the effects of annealing temperature on the optical properties of indium tin oxide thin films studied by Drude-Lorentz model. App. Surf. Sci., 255(16), 7203 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32Tompkins, H.G. and Irene, E.A.: Handbook of Ellipsometry (Springer, Berlin, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33Aspnes, D.E.: Optical properties of thin films. Thin Solid Films 89, 249 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34Azzam, R.M.A. and Bashara, N.M.: Ellipsometry and Polarized Light (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1992).Google Scholar
35Hillebrant, H. and Tanoka, M.: Electrochemical characterization of self-assembled alkylsiloxane monolayers on indium-tin oxide (ITO) semiconductor electrodes. J. Phys. Chem. B 105, 4270 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36Kulinich, S.A. and Farzaneh, M.: Alkylsilane self-assembled monolayers: Modelling their wetting characteristics. Appl. Surf. Sci. 230, 232 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37Miyama, M., Yang, Y., Yasuda, T., Okuno, T. and Yasuda, H.K.: Static and dynamic contact angles of water on polymeric surfaces. Langmuir 13, 5494 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38Seki, S., Aoyama, T., Sawada, Y., Ogawa, M., Sano, M., Miyabayashi, N., Yoshida, H., Hoshi, Y., Ide, M. and Shida, A.: Evolution of water vapor from indium-tin-oxide thin films fabricated by various deposition processes. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 69, 1021 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39Sawada, Y., Seki, S., Sano, M., Miyabayashi, N., Ninomiya, K., Iwasawa, A., Tsugashi, T., Ozao, R. and Nishimoto, Y.: Evolution of water vapor from indium-tin-oxide transparent conducting films fabricated by the dip coating process. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 77, 751 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40Ryzhikov, I.A., Pukhov, A.A., Iléin, A.S., Glukhova, N.P., Afanasiev, K.N. and Ryzhikov, A.S.: Anomalous temperature dependence of the conductivity of nanoporous ITO films. Microelectron. Eng. 69, 270 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar