Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T11:29:07.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In situ Transmission Electron Microscopy Tensile Tests of a Peak- to Overaged γ′-strengthened Nickel Base Alloy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2005

Dietmar Baither*
Affiliation:
Institut für Materialphysik, Universität Münster, D-48149 Münster, Germany
Volker Mohles
Affiliation:
Institut für Metallkunde und Metallphysik, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule, D-52056 Aachen, Germany
Eckhard Nembach
Affiliation:
Institut für Materialphysik, Universität Münster, D-48149 Münster, Germany
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The commercial nickel base alloy NIMONIC PE16 is strengthened by nano-scale spherical coherent precipitates of the intermetallic γ′-phase Ni3(Al,Ti). A bulk polycrystalline specimen of NIMONIC PE16 was aged such that it was in the transition range from the peak- to the overaged state. This transition limits the duration of technically useful aging treatments of structural particle strengthened materials. Thin foils prepared from this specimen were stretched inside a transmission electron microscope, and the dislocation processes were observed under full load. Two dislocations with identical Burgers vectors of the type 1/2〈110〉 form a pair and glide together. The leading 1/2〈110〉 dislocation bypasses the γ′-precipitates and the trailing one shears them. These dislocation processes are also discussed with reference to the results of computer simulations.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Nembach, E. and Neite, G.: Precipitation hardening of superalloys by ordered γ′-particles. Prog. Mater. Sci. 29, 177 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Dislocations in Solids, Vol. 10, edited by Nabarro, F.R.N. and Duesbery, M.S. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1996.Google Scholar
3Ardell, A.J.: Precipitation hardening. Metall. Trans. A 16A, 2131 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Reppich, B. In Materials Science and Technology, edited by Cahn, R.W., Haasen, P., and Kramer, E.J. (VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 1993), Vol. 6, p. 311.Google Scholar
5Nembach, E.: Particle Strengthening of Metals and Alloys (Wiley, New York, 1996).Google Scholar
6Nembach, E.: Order strengthening: Recent developments, with special reference to aluminium-lithium-alloys. Prog. Mater. Sci. 45, 275 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Orowan, E. in Symposium on Internal Stresses in Metals and Alloys. (Inst. Metals, London, U.K., 1948), p. 451.Google Scholar
8Baither, D., Krol, T. and Nembach, E.: In-situ transmission-electron-microscopy study of dislocation processes at precipitate-free zones in a γ′-strengthened superalloy. Philos. Mag. 83, 4011 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Mohles, V.: The critical resolved shear stress of single crystals with long-range ordered precipitates calculated by dislocation dynamics simulations. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 365, 144 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Porter, D.A. and Easterling, K.E.: Phase Transformations in Metals and Alloys, 2nd ed. (Chapman and Hall, London, U.K., 1993).Google Scholar
11Brown, L.M.: Self-stress of dislocations and the shape of extended nodes. Philos. Mag. 10, 441 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12DeWit, G. and Koehler, J.S.: Interaction of dislocations with an applied stress in anisotropic crystals. Phys. Rev. 116, 1113 (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Ostwald, W.: On the supposed isometry of the red and yellow mercury oxide and the surface tension of solids. Z. Phys. Chem. 34, 495 (1900).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Baither, D., Rentenberger, C., Karnthalter, H.P. and Nembach, E.: Three alternative experimental methods to determine the antiphase-boundary energies of the γ′ precipitates in superalloys. Philos. Mag. A 82, 1795 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar