Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-cx56b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-02T13:58:24.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In situ monitoring of the sintering behavior of microcomposite particles using a laser scanning micrometer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Z. Chen
Affiliation:
Space Power Institute, 231 Leach Science Center, Auburn, Alabama 36849
S-F. Chen
Affiliation:
Space Power Institute, 231 Leach Science Center, Auburn, Alabama 36849
R. A. Overfelt
Affiliation:
Space Power Institute, 231 Leach Science Center, Auburn, Alabama 36849
M. F. Rose
Affiliation:
Space Power Institute, 231 Leach Science Center, Auburn, Alabama 36849
Get access

Abstract

The densification behavior of silica-coated alumina particles was investigated during sintering using a laser scanning micrometer. Traditional dilatometric techniques require contact between a push-rod and the sample under study and thus place the sample under stress during the test. However, the utilization of a noncontact laser micrometer to measure dimensional changes during sintering enabled the densification behavior to be very accurately characterized under a stress-free condition. Thus higher temperature experiments, where densification rates are particularly temperature sensitive and the samples are especially soft, can be reliably investigated without the disturbing influence of an external force. The present paper describes an application of the technique to evaluate the densification behavior from 900–1300 °C of silica-coated alumina microcomposite particles used for the fabrication of mullite.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Young, W. S. and Cutler, I. B., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 53 (12), 659–636 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Hillman, S. H. and German, R. M., J. Mater. Sci. 27, 26412648 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Wei, T. S. and German, R. M., in Modern Developments in Powder Metallurgy, edited by Aqua, E. N. and Whitman, C. I. (Metal Powder Industries Federation, Princeton, NJ, 1985), Vol. 15, p. 307.Google Scholar
4.Sacks, M. D., Bozkurt, N., and Scheiffele, G. W., in Ceramic Transactions, Vol. 19, Advanced Composite Materials, edited by Sacks, M. D. (American Ceramic Society, Westerville, OH, 1991).Google Scholar
5.Sacks, M. D., Bozkurt, N., and Scheiffele, G. W., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74 (10), 24282437 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Sacks, M. D., Lin, Y-J., Scheiffele, G. W., Wang, K., and Bozkurt, N., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 78 (11), 28972906 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Wang, K. and Sacks, M. D., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 79 (1), 1216 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Kim, K. D. and Ondracek, G., J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 14 (5), 455456 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar