Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:06:44.431Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

High-temperature lead-free SnSb solders: Wetting reactions on Cu foils and phased-in Cu–Cr thin films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

J. W. Jang ,
P. G. Kim ,
K. N. Tu  and
Michael Lee
J. W. Jang
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095–1595
P. G. Kim
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095–1595
K. N. Tu
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095–1595
Michael Lee
Affiliation:
Fujitsu Computer Packaging Technologies, San Jose, CA 95134
Get access

Abstract

We report the soldering behaviors of high-temperature (300 °C) lead-free SnSb alloys on Cu foils and phased-in Cu–Cr thin films. By increasing the Sb content from 5 to 15 wt%, the solder surface became rougher and the wetting angle decreased from 50° to 20° on the Cu foils. Interfacial compounds were found to be Cu6Sn5 and Cu3Sn. The Cu6Sn5 showed a scallop-type morphology, whereas the Cu3Sn had a layer-type morphology. The growth of the latter was found to be diffusion limited. On phased-in Cu–Cr thin films, the solders showed much lower wetting angles than on the Cu foils, but the dewetting phenomenon was observed after 1 min of reflow time in the 85Sn15Sb alloy. In comparison, we found no dewetting of the high-temperature 95Pb5Sn solder.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 14 , Issue 10 , October 1999 , pp. 3895 - 3900
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.The National Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (Semiconductor Industry Association, San Jose, CA, 1997).Google Scholar
2.Tummala, R.P. and Rymaszewski, E.J., Microelectronics Packaging Handbook (Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1989).Google Scholar
3.Seraphim, D., Lasky, R., and Li, C.Y., Principle of Electronic Packaging (McGraw Hill, New York, 1989).Google Scholar
4.Winterbottom, W.L., J. Metals 45, 20 (1993).Google Scholar
5.Artaki, I., Jackson, A.M., and Vianco, P.T., J. Electronic Mater. 23, 757 (1994).Google Scholar
6.Pan, G.Z., Liu, A.A., Kim, H.K., Tu, K.N., and Totta, P.A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 2946 (1997).Google Scholar
7.Young, T., Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London 95, 65 (1805).Google Scholar
8.Romig, A.D., Chang, Y.A., Stephens, J.J., Marcotte, V., Lea, C., and Frear, D.R. in Solder Mechanics, edited by Frear, D.R., Jones, W.B., and Kinsman, K.R. (Minerals, Metals, and Materials Society, Warrendale, PA, 1991), Chap. 2.Google Scholar
9.Smith, G.C. and Lea, C., Surf. Interf. Anal. 9, 145 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Kim, H.K., Liou, H.K., and Tu, K.N., J. Mater. Res. 10, 497 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Kim, H.K. and Tu, K.N., Phys. Rev. B 53, 16027 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Flemings, M.C., Solidification Processing (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Massalski, T.B., Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams (ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1990) Vol. 3.Google Scholar
14.Liu, C.Y., Kim, H.K., Tu, K.N., and Totta, P.A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 4014 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar