Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-k2jvg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-07T12:04:52.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

High resolution transmission electron microscopy of Ba1−xKxBiO3 superconductor-insulator-superconductor grain boundary tunnel junctions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Siu-Wai Chan ,
A. Kussmaul ,
E. S. Hellman  and
E. H. Hartford Jr.
Siu-Wai Chan
Affiliation:
School of Engineering and Applied Science, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027
A. Kussmaul
Affiliation:
Lasertron Inc., Bedford, Massachusetts 01730
E. S. Hellman
Affiliation:
Lucent Technologies, Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974
E. H. Hartford Jr.
Affiliation:
Lucent Technologies, Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974
Get access

Extract

High angle boundaries in Ba1−xKxBiO3 are superconductor-insulator-superconductor (SIS) Josephson tunnel junctions of a quality unequaled among the high temperature superconducting oxides. Electron microscopy of 24° [001] tilt boundaries reveals nominally symmetric and straight boundaries of aperiodic structure with reappearing structural units. Low {hk0} atomistic facets are predominant. A segregation layer of only 1 nm thick is identified straddling the boundary. This layer which forms naturally is insulating, pin-hole free, and surprisingly robust with a breakdown voltage which exceeds 1 × 106 V/cm, yet thin enough to allow quasiparticle tunneling, yielding reliable gap energies for theoretical comparison.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 13 , Issue 7 , July 1998 , pp. 1774 - 1779
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Cava, R. J., Batlogg, B., Krajewski, J. J., Farrow, R., Rupp, L. W. Jr., White, A. E., Short, K., Peck, W. F., and Kometani, T., Nature (London) 332, 814 (1988).Google Scholar
2.Schweinfurth, R. A., Platt, C. E., Teepe, M. R., and Van Harlingen, D. J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 61, 480 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Pargellis, A. N., Sharifi, F., Dynes, R. C., Miller, B., Hellman, E. S., Rosamilia, J. M., and Hartford, E. H. Jr., Appl. Phys. Lett. 58, 95 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Hellman, E. S., Martin, S., Hartford, E. H. Jr., Werder, D. J., Roesler, G. M. Jr., and Tedrow, P. M., Physica C 201, 166 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Fink, R. L., Thompson, M., Hilbert, C., and Kroger, H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 61, 595 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Baumert, B. A., Talvacchio, J., and Forrester, M. G., Appl. Phys. Lett. 62, 2137 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Kussmaul, A., Hellman, E. S., Hartford, E. H. Jr., and Tedrow, P. M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 63, 2824 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Inoue, M., Imaeda, S., Tsukino, Y., Fujimaki, A., Takai, Y., and Hayakawa, H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 65, 243 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Kussmaul, A., Hellman, E. S., Hartford, E. H. Jr., Gupta, A., and Tedrow, P. M., in The Proceeding of The International Society for Optical Engineering (SPIE) (1994), Vol. 2158, p. 124.Google Scholar
10.Kawasaki, M., Sarnelli, E., Chaudari, P., Gupta, A., Kussmaul, A., and Lacey, J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 62, 417 (1993), and references cited within.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Pei, S., Jorgensen, J. D., Dabrowski, B., Hinks, D. G., Richards, D. R., Mitchell, A. W., Newsam, J. M., Sinha, S. K., Vaknim, D., and Jacobson, A. J., Phys. Rev. B 41, 4126 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Σ is the reciprocal of the density of the lattice sites in coincidence between two crystals at a misorientation.Google Scholar
13.Miller, D. J., Roberts, T. A., Kang, J. H., Tavalcchio, J., Buchholz, D. B., and Chang, R. P. H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 2561 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. See, for example, Kingery, W. D., Bowen, H. K., and Uhlmann, D. R., Introduction to Ceramics (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1976), p. 962.Google Scholar
15. See also Barone, A. and Paterno, G., Physics and Applications of Josephson Effect (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Hellman, E. S. and Hartford, E. H., Phys. Rev. B (Mar., 1997).Google Scholar
17.Chaillout, C., Chenavas, J., Dürr, J., Marezio, M., and Schneemeyer, L. F., Physica C 185, 697 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Idemoto, Y., Iwata, Y., and Fueki, K., Physica C 222, 257 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. We used the procedure shown by Cahn, J. W., in Interfacial Segregation, edited by Johnson, W. C. and Blakely, J. M. (American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1979), p. 3.Google Scholar
20.Hondros, E. D. and Seah, M. P., in Physical Metallurgy, edited by Cahn, R. W. and Haasen, P. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1983), p. 855.Google Scholar
21.Yan, M., Sob, M., Luzzi, D. E., Vitek, V., Ackland, G. J., Methfessel, , and Rodriquez, C. O., Phys. Rev. B 47, 5571 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Chan, S-W., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 55, 1415 (1995), and references cited therein.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Smith, C. S., Trans. Am. Soc. Metals. 45, 533 (1953).Google Scholar
24.Takagi, T., Chiang, Y-M., and Roshko, A., J. Appl. Phys. 68, 5750 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Only one sample (45° on SrTiO3) in Refs. 7 and 9 showed small and unstable Josephson currents, certainly not of a magnitude that would be expected from the Ambegoakar–Baratoff relationship. For the Ambegoakar–Baratoff relationship, see Wolf, E. L., Principles of Electron Tunneling Spectroscopy (Oxford University Press, New York, 1985).Google Scholar