Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T22:47:38.932Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Grain boundary structure in TiO2-excess barium titanate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Takahisa Yamamoto ,
Yuichi Ikuhara ,
Katsuro Hayashi  and
Taketo Sakuma
Takahisa Yamamoto
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, The University of Tokyo, 7–3-1 Hongo, Bukyo-ku, Tokyo 113, Japan
Yuichi Ikuhara
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, The University of Tokyo, 7–3-1 Hongo, Bukyo-ku, Tokyo 113, Japan
Katsuro Hayashi
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, The University of Tokyo, 7–3-1 Hongo, Bukyo-ku, Tokyo 113, Japan
Taketo Sakuma
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, The University of Tokyo, 7–3-1 Hongo, Bukyo-ku, Tokyo 113, Japan
Get access

Extract

Grain boundary structure was examined in 0.1 mol% TiO2-excess BaTiO3 by high-resolution electron microscopy (HRTEM) and electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS). Their grain boundaries were mostly faceted with {210} type habit. The faceted boundaries were characterized to be associated with an extra Ti–O2 bond with the rutile-like structure. The grain growth behavior in a small TiO2-excess BaTiO3 is discussed from the viewpoint of grain boundary structure.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 13 , Issue 12 , December 1998 , pp. 3449 - 3452
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Greuter, F. and Blatter, G., Semicond. Sci. Technol. 5, 111 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Kuwabara, M., Morimo, K., and Matsunaga, T., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 79, 997 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Hayashi, K., Yamamoto, T., and Sakuma, T., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 79, 1669 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Adachi, H. and Taniguchi, K., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 49, 1944 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Tanaka, I., Kawai, J., and Adachi, H., Solid State Commun. 93, 533 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Tanaka, I., Nakajima, T., Kawai, J., Adachi, H., Gu, H., and Ruhle, M., Philos. Mag. Lett. 75, 21 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Hennings, D., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 70, 23 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Kastner, G., Wagner, R., and Hilarius, V., Philos. Mag. A 69, 1051 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Schmeltz, H. and Mayer, A., Ber. Dtsch. Keram. Ges. 59, 436 (1982).Google Scholar
10.Oppolzer, H. and Schmeltz, H., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 66, 444 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Kirby, K. W. and Wechsler, B. A., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74, 1841 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Yamamoto, T., Br. Ceram. Trans. 94, 196 (1995).Google Scholar