Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:48:08.601Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The formation of intermetallics in Cu/In thin films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Rita Roy
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science, Jadavpur, Calcutta-700032, India
S.K. Sen
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science, Jadavpur, Calcutta-700032, India
Suchitra Sen
Affiliation:
Central Glass and Ceramic Research Institute, Jadavpur, Calcutta-700032, India
Get access

Abstract

The kinetics of the formation of intermetallics in the Cu–In bimetallic thin film couple have been studied from room temperature to 432 K by measuring the evolution of composite and contact electrical resistance with time and temperature. The resistivity measurements have been supplemented by x-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Copper reacts with indium even at room temperature to form CuIn intermetallic and assuming a model of defect assisted diffusion into the grains, the activation energy averaged over five different samples is found to be 0.40 eV. The grain boundary diffusion is found to occur with an average activation energy of 0.55 eV. XRD confirms the growth of CuIn intermetallic and on annealing at higher temperature, for copper-rich films copper further reacts with CuIn to form Cu9In4. Further evidences of solid state reactions and grain boundary diffusion through Cu grain boundaries have been obtained from SEM study. TEM indicates the growth of the grain size on annealing and confirms the presence of the CuIn phase.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Warburton, W. K. and Turnbull, D., Diffusion in Solids: Recent Developments, edited by Nowick, A. S. and Burton, J. J. (Academic Press, New York, 1975), p. 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Sen, S. K., Ghorai, A., Bandyopadhyay, A. K., and Sen, Suchitra, Thin Solid Films 155, 243 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Bandyopadhyay, A. K. and Sen, S. K., J. Appl. Phys. 67, 9681 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Roy, Rita (nee Mukhopadhyay) and Sen, S. K., Thin Solid Films 197, 303 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Simic, V. and Marinkovic, Z., J. Less-Common Metals 72, 133 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Keppner, W., Wesche, R., Klas, T., Voigt, J., and Schatz, G., Thin Solid Films 143, 201 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Hall, P. M., Morabito, J. M., and Poate, J. M., Thin Solid Films 33, 107 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Bauer, C. L. and Jordan, A. G., Phys. Status Solidi A 47, 321 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Gust, W., Ostertag, C., Predel, B., Roll, U., Lodding, A., and Odelius, H., Philos. Mag. A 47, 395 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Hasumi, Y., J. Appl. Phys. 58, 3081 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Gjostein, N. A., Diffusion (American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1973), p. 241.Google Scholar
12.Hwang, J. M. C. and Balluffi, R. W., Scripta Metall. 12, 709 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Gupta, A. and Murthy, A. S. N., J. Mater. Sci. 8, 559 (1989).Google Scholar