Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:49:32.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Formation and self-organization of nanometer-scale Au particles on graphite by vacuum deposition in iodine vapor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Katsuya Honda
Affiliation:
π-Electron Materials Project, ERATO, Japan Science and Technology Corporation, 43 Miyukigaoka, Tsukuba-shi, Ibaraki, 305, Japan
Nobusuke Yamada
Affiliation:
π-Electron Materials Project, ERATO, Japan Science and Technology Corporation, 43 Miyukigaoka, Tsukuba-shi, Ibaraki, 305, Japan
Masahito Sano
Affiliation:
π-Electron Materials Project, ERATO, Japan Science and Technology Corporation, 43 Miyukigaoka, Tsukuba-shi, Ibaraki, 305, Japan
Susumu Yoshimura
Affiliation:
π-Electron Materials Project, ERATO, Japan Science and Technology Corporation, 43 Miyukigaoka, Tsukuba-shi, Ibaraki, 305, Japan
Get access

Abstract

Vacuum depositions of Au on highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG) and SiO2 substrates in iodine vapor of 1 × 10–4 Torr give rise to formation of dispersed nanoscale Au particles at room temperature. The iodine is physisorbed on the Au surface and prevents the Au particles from coalescing. The mean diameter of Au particles on highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG) is about 40 nm, which is larger than that on SiO2 The particles on HOPG have a narrower and more uniform size distribution than those on SiO2. Radial distribution function of the particles on HOPG showed many well-defined peaks, whereas that on SiO2 had only one peak, indicating highly structured deposition on HOPG by iodine adsorption.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Kunitake, M., Batina, N., and Itaya, K., Langmuir, 2337 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Temmyo, J. and Tamamura, T., Nature 369, 131 (1994).Google Scholar
3.Darby, T.P. and Wayman, C. M., J. Cryst. Growth 28, 41 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Wayman, C. M. and Darby, T. P., J. Cryst. Growth 28, 53 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Green, A. K., Bauer, E., and Dancy, J., J. Appi. Phys. 41, 4736 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Prost, J. and Rondelez, F., Nature 350, 11 (1991).Google Scholar
7.Alexeev, V.L., Ilekit, P., Persello, J., Lambard, J., Gllik, T., and Cabane, B., Langmuir, 2392 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Takayanagi, T., Imono 52, 152 (1980) (in Japanese).Google Scholar
9.Neumann, A., Christmann, K., and Solomun, T., Surf. Sci. 278/288, 593 (1995).Google Scholar
10.Iwamoto, K. and Oishi, J., Nucl. Sci. Technol. 5, 437 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Kitagawa, H.H., Kojima, N., and Nakajima, T., J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans., 3121 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Hayashi, T., Ohno, T., Yatsuta, S., and Uyeda, R., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 16, 705 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar