Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:45:30.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Flow softening behavior of Ti–13V–11Cr–3Al beta Ti alloy in double-hit hot compression tests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2016

A. Momeni Open the ORCID record for A. Momeni [Opens in a new window] ,
S.M. Abbasi ,
M. Morakabati  and
S.M. Ghazi Mirsaed
A. Momeni*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Hamedan University of Technology, Hamedan, Iran
S.M. Abbasi
Affiliation:
Metallic Materials Research Center (MMRC), Maleke Ashtar University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
M. Morakabati
Affiliation:
Metallic Materials Research Center (MMRC), Maleke Ashtar University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
S.M. Ghazi Mirsaed
Affiliation:
Metallic Materials Research Center (MMRC), Maleke Ashtar University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Single- and double-hit hot compression tests were performed at 1030 °C and strain rate of 0.1 s−1 on Ti–13V–11Cr–3Al beta Ti alloy to investigate the flow behavior and mechanism of microstructural evolution during the interpass period. It was observed that the flow stress level and the extent of yield point phenomena (YPP) were increased by an increase in the grain size. After the first pass, the microstructure was bimodal of large deformed grains and small recrystallized grains formed by continuous dynamic recrystallization. The increase in the interpass time to 100 s, led to the decrease in the yield drop and extent of YPP. However, the further increase in the interpass time to 300 s would result in an inverse effect. A combination between static recrystallization and metadynamic recrystallization was found responsible for grain refinement in the samples subjected to the interpass times below 100 s. At longer interpass times, i.e., 300 s, grain growth increased the average grain size.

Keywords

Tihot pressingmicrostructurestress/strain relationship
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 31 , Issue 24 , 28 December 2016 , pp. 3900 - 3906
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Uranga, P., Fernández, A.I., López, B., and Rodriguez-Ibabe, J.M.: Transition between static and metadynamic recrystallisation kinetics in coarse Nb microalloyed austenite. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 345, 319 (2003).Google Scholar
Lin, Y.C., Chen, X.M., Chen, M.S., Zhou, Y., Wen, D.X., and He, D.G.: A new method to predict the metadynamic recrystallization behavior in a typical nickel-based superalloy. Appl. Phys. A: Solids Surf. 122, 601 (2016).Google Scholar
Gu, S., Zhang, C., Zhang, L., and Shen, W.: Characteristics of metadynamic recrystallisation of Nimonic 80A superalloy. J. Mater. Research 30, 538 (2015).Google Scholar
Cho, S-H. and Yoo, Y-C.: Metadynamic recrystallisation of austenitic stainless steel. J. Mater. Sci. 36, 4279 (2001).Google Scholar
Xu, D., Zhang, B., Zhu, M., and Zhao, H.: Meta-dynamic recrystallization behavior of SCM435 steel. Metallurgist 59, 899 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qi, H. and Li, Y.: Metadynamic recrystallization of the as cast 42CrMo steel after normalizing and tempering during hot compression. Chinese J. Mech. Eng. 25, 853 (2012).Google Scholar
Momeni, A., Shokuhfar, A., and Abbasi, S.M.: Metadynamic recrystallization of a precipitation hardenable stainless steel. MJoM Metalurgija - J. Metal 13, 179 (2007).Google Scholar
Li, X., Zhang, H-B., Luo, Z-H., and Zhang, Y.: Kinetics for static recrystallization after hot working of 0.38C-0.99Cr-0.16Mo steel. J. Central South University Technol. 11, 353 (2004).Google Scholar
Matsumoto, H., Kitamura, M., Li, Y., Koizumi, Y., and Chiba, A.: Hot forging characteristic of Ti–5Al–5V–5Mo–3Cr alloy with single metastable β microstructure. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 611, 337 (2014).Google Scholar
Abbasi, S.M. and Momeni, A.: Effect of hot working and post-deformation heat treatment on microstructure and tensile properties of Ti–6Al–4V alloy. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 21, 1728 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ouyang, D-L., Wang, K-L., and Cui, X.: Dynamic recrystallisation of Ti–6Al–2Zr–1Mo–1V in β forging process. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 22, 761 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbasi, S.M., Momeni, A., Akhondzadeh, A., and Ghazi Mirsaed, S.M.: Microstructure and mechanical behavior of hot compressed Ti–6V–6Mo–6Fe–3Al. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 639, 21 (2015).Google Scholar
Luo, Y.Y., Xi, Z.P., Zeng, W.D., Mao, X.N., Yang, Y.L., and Niu, H.Z.: Characteristics of high-temperature deformation behavior of Ti–45Al–2Cr–3Ta–0.5W alloy. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 23, 3577 (2014).Google Scholar
Abbasi, S.M., Morakabati, M., Sheikhali, A.H., and Momeni, A.: Hot deformation behavior of beta titanium Ti–13V–11Cr–3Al alloy. Met. Mater. Trans. 45A, 5201 (2014).Google Scholar
Chandra, T., Ionescu, M., and Mantovani, D.: Hot deformation and dynamic recrystallisation of the beta phase in titanium alloys. Mater. Sci. Forum 707–709, 127 (2012).Google Scholar
Fan, J.K., Kou, H.C., Lai, M.J., Tang, B., Chang, H., and Li, J.S.: Hot deformation mechanism and microstructure evolution of a new near β Titanium alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 584, 121 (2013).Google Scholar
Babareko, A.A., Belova, O.S., Kopilov, V.N., Razuvaeva, I.N., and Khesin, Y.D.: Dynamic recrystallisation of beta-phase in titanium alloy. Met. Sci. Heat Treat. 33, 703 (1991).Google Scholar
Momeni, A. and Abbasi, S.M.: Effect of hot working on flow behavior of Ti–6Al–4V alloy in single phase and two phase regions. Mater. Des. 31, 3599 (2010).Google Scholar
Abbasi, S.M., Momeni, A., Lin, Y.C., and Jafarian, H.R.: Dynamic softening mechanism in Ti–13V–11Cr–3Al beta Ti alloy during hot compressive deformation. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 665, 154 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebrahimi, G.R., Momeni, A., Abbasi, S.M., and Monajatizadeh, H.: Constitutive analysis and processing map for hot working of a Ni–Cu alloy. Met. Mater. Int. 19, 11 (2013).Google Scholar
Longfei, L., Wangyue, Y., and Zuqing, S.: Dynamic recrystallisation of ferrite in a low-carbon steel. Met. Mater. Trans. 37, 609 (2006).Google Scholar
Kang, S., Jung, J-G., Kang, M., Woo, W., and Lee, Y-K.: The effects of grain size on yielding, strain hardening, and mechanical twinning in Fe–18Mn–0.6C–1.5Al twinning-induced plasticity steel. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 652, 212 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Momeni, A., Abbasi, S.M., and Shokuhfar, A.: Dynamic and metadynamic recrystallisation of a martensitic precipitation hardenable stainless steel. Can. Metall. Quart. 46, 189 (2007).Google Scholar
He, D.G., Lin, Y.C., Chen, M.S., and Li, L.: Kinetics equations and microstructural evolution during metadynamic recrystallization in a nickel-based superalloy with δ phase. J. Alloys Compd. 690, 971 (2017).Google Scholar
Lin, Y.C., Liu, Y.X., Chen, M.S., Huang, M.H., Ma, X., and Long, Z.L.: Study of static recrystallization behavior in hot deformed Ni-based superalloy using cellular automaton model. Mater. Design 99, 107 (2016).Google Scholar