Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T11:04:01.091Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fabrication and compressive strength of macrochannelled tetragonal zirconia polycrystals with calcium phosphate coating layer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Young-Hag Koh
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, 151–742, Korea
Hae-Won Kim
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, 151–742, Korea
Hyoun-Ee Kim
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, 151–742, Korea
John W. Halloran
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109–2136
Get access

Abstract

Macrochannelled tetragonal zirconia polycrystals (TZP) coated with a calcium phosphate layer were fabricated using a coextrusion process to produce strong and bioactive porous bioceramics. The initial feedrod, composed of three materials [TZP (shell), calcium phosphate (intermediate layer), and carbon black (core)], was coextruded through a 750-μm orifice at 120 °C, producing a continuous and flexible filament. Each sheet, which was composed of a unidirectional array of filaments, was stacked and then warm-pressed at 140 °C with 10 MPa. After binder burnout, the green billet was sintered between 1350 and 1600 °C for 1 h in air, leaving uniform macrochannels clad on the inside with bioactive calcium phosphate on a strong TZP body. The compressive strength of the specimen was much higher than that of calcium phosphate with a similar structure.

Type
Rapid Communications
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Hench, L.L., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 81, 1705 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Lavernia, C. and Schoenung, J.M., Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 70, 95 (1991).Google Scholar
3.Narasaraju, T.S.B. and Phebe, D.E., J. Mater. Sci. 31, 1 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Suchanek, W. and Yoshimura, M., J. Mater. Res. 13, 94 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Legeros, R.Z., Prog. Cryst. Grow. Char. 4, 1 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Rosen, H.M., Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 83, 985 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Passuti, N., Daculsi, G., Rogez, J.M., Martin, S., and Bainvel, J.V., Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 248, 169 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Chang, B.S., Lee, C.K., Hong, K.S., Youn, H.J., Ryu, H.S., Chung, S.S., and Park, K.W., Biomaterials 21, 1291 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Roy, D.M. and Linnehan, S.K., Nature (London) 247, 220 (1974).Google Scholar
10.Liu, D.M., Biomaterials 17, 1955 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Liu, D.M., Ceram. Inter. 23, 135 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Huec, J.C., Schaeverbeke, T., Clement, D., Faber, J., and Rebeller, A. Le, Biomaterials 16, 113 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Koh, Y-H., Kim, H-W., Kim, H-E., and Halloran, J.W., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 85, 2578 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Kim, H-W., Noh, Y-J., Koh, Y-H., Kim, H-E., and Kim, H-M., Biomaterials 23, 4113 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Ugural, A.C., Mechanics of Materials (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1993), p. 115.Google Scholar
16.Hench, L.L. and Wilson, J., An Introduction to Bioceramics (World Scientific, London, U.K., 1993), p. 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar