Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T23:08:10.801Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fabrication and characterization of aluminum matrix fly ash cenosphere composites using different stir casting routes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2014

Yufu Sun ,
Yezhe Lyu ,
Airong Jiang  and
Jingyu Zhao
Yufu Sun*
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450002, People’s Republic of China
Yezhe Lyu
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450002, People’s Republic of China; and Department of Machine Design, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm SE-10044, Sweden
Airong Jiang
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450002, People’s Republic of China
Jingyu Zhao
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450002, People’s Republic of China
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Aluminum matrix fly ash (AMFA) cenosphere composites were fabricated using the stir casting technique. The used type of fly ash cenosphere, which accounted for over 60% in all fly ash particles, was in narrow and small size (2–30 μm). During synthesis, effects of several key technological parameters on microstructure and properties were investigated using orthogonal experimental design. The optimal technological parameter was achieved as: melt temperature of 700 °C + stirring rate of 1200 r/min + stirring time of 6 min + fly ash cenosphere content of 13 wt%. With this optimal technological parameter, as-cast and forged composites were manufactured. Their tensile strengths were measured and improved maximally by 50% when the cenosphere content is 13 wt%. Such size and content of fly ash cenosphere and technological parameter could largely improve the properties of composites, which should be introduced into the production process of AMFA composites.

Keywords

compositescastingAl
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , 28 January 2014 , pp. 260 - 266
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Rohatgi, P.K., Weiss, D., and Gupta, N.: Applications of fly ash in synthesizing low-cost MMCs for automotive and other applications. JOM(11), 71 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, P., Balog, M., Yan, M., Schaffer, G.B., and Qian, M.: In situ fabrication and mechanical properties of Al-AlN composite by hot extrusion of partially nitrided AA6061 powder. J. Mater. Res. 26(14), 1719 (2011).Google Scholar
Shen, J., Yin, W., Wei, Q., Li, Y., Liu, J., and An, L.: Effect of ceramic nanoparticle reinforcements on the quasistatic and dynamic mechanical properties of magnesium-based metal matrix composites. J. Mater. Res. 28(13), 1835 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajan, T.P.D., Pillai, R.M., Pai, B.C., Satyanarayana, K.G., and Rohatgi, P.K.: Fabrication and characterization of Al-7Si-0.35Mg/fly ash metal matrix composites processed by different stir casting routes. Compos. Sci. Technol. 67, 3369 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondal, D.P., Das, S., Ramakrishnan, N., and Uday Bhasker, K.: Cenosphere filled aluminum syntactic foam made through stir-casting technique. Composites Part A 40, 279 (2009).Google Scholar
Rohatgi, P.K., Daoud, A., Schultz, B.F., and Puri, T.: Microstructure and mechanical behavior of die casting AZ91D-Fly ash cenosphere composites. Composites Part A 40, 883 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohatgi, P.K., Kim, J.K., Gupta, N., Alaraj, S., and Daoud, A.: Compressive characteristics of A356/fly ash cenosphere composites synthesized by pressure infiltration technique. Composites Part A 37, 430 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rams, J., Campo, M., and Ureña, A.: Sol-gel coatings to improve processing of aluminium matrix SiC reinforced composite materials. J. Mater. Res. 19(7), 2109 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marin, E., Lekka, M., Andreatta, F., Fedrizzi, L., Itskos, G., Moutsatsou, A., Koukouzas, N., and Kouloumbi, N.: Electrochemical study of aluminum-fly ash composites obtained by powder metallurgy. Mater. Charact. 69, 16 (2012).Google Scholar
Narasimha Murthy, I., Venkata Rao, D., and Babu Rao, J.: Microstructure and mechanical properties of aluminum-fly ash nano composites made by ultrasonic method. Mater. Des. 35, 55 (2012).Google Scholar
Wang, F., Zhang, K., Zhu, J., and Ye, L.: Effect of Mn content on the microstructure and mechanical properties of (Ti, Mn) Al/Al2O3 in situ composites prepared by hot pressing. J. Mater. Res. 28(12), 1574 (2013).Google Scholar
Uju, W.A. and Oguocha, I.N.A.: Thermal cycling behavior of stir cast Al-Mg alloy reinforced with fly ash. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 526, 100 (2009).Google Scholar
Miracle, D.B.: Metal matrix composites-from science to technological significance. Compos. Sci. Technol. 65, 2526 (2005).Google Scholar
Hrairi, M., Ahmed, M., and Nimir, Y.: Compaction of fly ash-aluminum alloy composites and evaluation of their mechanical and acoustic properties. Adv. Powder. Technol. 20, 548 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parvaiz, M.R., Mohanty, S., Nayak, S.K., and Mahanwar, P.A.: Effect of surface modification of fly ash on the mechanical, thermal, electrical and morphological properties of polyetheretherketone composites. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 528, 4277 (2011).Google Scholar
Xu, Z., Ma, L., Yan, J., Yang, S., and Du, S.: Wetting and oxidation during ultrasonic soldering of an alumina reinforced aluminum–copper–magnesium (2024 Al) matrix composite. Composites Part A 43, 404 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohatgi, P.K., Kim, J.K., Guo, R.Q., Robertson, D.P., and Gajdardziska-Josifovska, M.: Age-hardening characteristics of aluminum alloy-hollow fly ash composites. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 33, 1541 (2002).Google Scholar
Gikunoo, E., Omotoso, O., and Oguocha, I.N.A.: Effect of fly ash addition on the magnesium content of casting aluminum alloy A535. J. Mater. Sci. 40, 487 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uju, W.A., and Oguocha, I.N.A.: A study of thermal expansion of Al-Mg alloy composites containing fly ash. Mater. Des. 33, 503 (2012).Google Scholar
Flemings, M.C., Riek, R.G., and Young, K.P.: Rheocasting. Mater. Sci. Eng. 25, 103 (1976).Google Scholar
Guo, R.Q. and Rohatgi, P.K.: Chemical reactions between aluminum and fly ash during synthesis and reheating of al-fly ash composites. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 29, 519 (1998).Google Scholar
Rohatgi, P.K., Guo, R.Q., Huang, P., and Ray, S.: Friction and abrasion resistance of cast aluminum alloy-fly ash composites. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 28, 245 (1997).Google Scholar
Ramesh, C.S., Anwar Khan, A.R., Ravikumar, N., and Savanprabhu, P.: Prediction of wear coefficient of Al6061-TiO2 composites. Wear 259, 602 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramesh, C.S. and Seshadri, S.K.: Tribological characteristics of nickel based composites coating. Wear 255, 893 (2003).Google Scholar
Finnie, L: Erosion of surfaces by solid particles. Wear 3, 87 (1960).Google Scholar
Lv, Y.Z., Sun, Y.F., Zhao, J.Y., Yu, G.W., Shen, J.J., and Hu, S.M.: Effect of tungsten on microstructure and properties of high chromium cast iron. Mater. Des. 39, 303 (2012).Google Scholar
Esawi, A.M.K., Morsi, K., Sayed, A., Taher, M., and Lanka, S.: The influence of carbon nanotube (CNT) morphology and diameter on the processing and properties of CNT-reinforced aluminium composites. Composites Part A 42, 234 (2011).Google Scholar