Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-02T22:23:07.355Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experimental assessment of the inhibition of reduction of Ca2+-doped barium titanate in a reducing atmosphere

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Tsang-Tse Fang  and
Jyh-Tzong Shuei
Tsang-Tse Fang
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan 701, Republic of China
Jyh-Tzong Shuei
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan 701, Republic of China
Get access

Abstract

Several experiments have been conducted to assess the possible mechanisms for the inhibition of reduction of Ca2+-doped barium titanate in a reducing atmosphere. Three methods, i.e., conventional, semiwet, and citrate processes, have been used to prepare the powders. It was found that the formation mechanism would influence the occupation of Ca2+ in the B site. Moreover, it was concluded that Ca2+ occupation of the B site is the major cause for the inhibition of reduction of Ca2+-doped barium titanate. Ti deficiency would be the driving force for Ca2+ to occupy the B site.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 14 , Issue 5 , May 1999 , pp. 1910 - 1915
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Sakabe, Y., Am. Ceram. Bull. 66 (9), 1338–1341 (1987).Google Scholar
2.Han, Y-H., Appleby, J. B., and Smyth, D. M., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 70 (2), 96–100 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Zhang, X.W., Han, Y.H., Lal, M., and Smyth, D.M., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 70 (2), 100–103 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Chan, H.M., Harmer, M.P., Lal, M., and Smyth, D.M., in Electron Microscopy of Materials, edited by Krakow, W., Smith, D. A., and Hobbs, L.W. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 31, Elsevier Science Publishing, New York, 1984), pp. 345–350.Google Scholar
5.Lin, T-F., Hu, C-T., and Lin, I-N., J. Appl. Phys. 67 (2), 1042–1047 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Desu, S. B., in Electronic Ceramic Materials, edited by Nowotny, Janusz (Trans Tech Publications, Aedermannsdorf, Switzerland, 1992), pp. 375–418.Google Scholar
7.Pechini, M., U.S. Patent No. 3,330,697 (1967).Google Scholar
8.Tiwari, V.S., Singh, N., and Pandey, D., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 77 (7), 1813–1818 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Tiwari, V.S. and Pandey, D., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 77 (7), 1819–1824 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Tiwari, V.S., Pandey, D., Krishna, P. S. R., Chakravarthy, R., and Dasannacharya, B.A., Physica B 174, 112–116 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Hennings, D.F. K. and Schreinemacher, H., J. Euro. Ceram. Soc. 15, 795–800 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Zhuang, Z.Q., Harmer, M.P., and Smyth, D. M., Mater. Res. Bull. 22 (10), 1329–1335 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Wakamatsu, M., Takeuchi, N., Lai, G-C., and Ishida, S., Yogyo-Kyokai-Shi 95 (12) 1181–1185 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar