Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:40:54.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Electrical resistivity and hydrogen-physisorption behavior of potassium-graphite intercalation compounds in the course of reactions with ammonia, water, and oxygen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

N. Akuzawa ,
Y. Amari ,
T. Nakajima  and
Y. Takahashi
N. Akuzawa
Affiliation:
Tokyo National College of Technology, 1220-2 Kunugida-machi, Hachioji-shi, Tokyo 193, Japan
Y. Amari
Affiliation:
Tokyo National College of Technology, 1220-2 Kunugida-machi, Hachioji-shi, Tokyo 193, Japan
T. Nakajima
Affiliation:
Tokyo National College of Technology, 1220-2 Kunugida-machi, Hachioji-shi, Tokyo 193, Japan
Y. Takahashi
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113, Japan
Get access

Abstract

The electrical resistivity of potassium-graphite intercalation compounds (K–GICs) was measured in the course of reactions with ammonia, oxygen, water, etc, The hydrogen absorption behavior at 77 K was also investigated on K–GICs before and after the reactions. The electrical resistivity of KC8 increased by reactions with ammonia, furan, and water vapor, whereas almost no change was observed in the case of the reaction with oxygen. Molecules of ammonia, furan, and water are considered to penetrate into the KC8 interlayers, while oxygen draws potassium from interlayer spaces toward the surface with resultant potassium-diluted mixed stage compounds. The hydrogen absorption isotherms of K(NH3)xC31 (0 ≤ x ≤ 2.65) at 77 K showed that the saturated amount of absorbed hydrogen, (H2/K)sat, decreased linearly with increasing ammonia content, x, When x went up to 2, (H2/K)sat became zero. Similar behavior in the degradation of the hydrogen absorption capacity of K(H2O)xC25 (0 ≤ x ≤ 1.3) was observed. Contrary to such behavior, partially oxidized KC24 could not absorb hydrogen gas. These facts are also explained by taking into account the fact that ammonia and water molecules penetrate K–GICs, while oxygen draws potassium atoms toward the surface, as predicted from the electrical resistivity measurements. Successive oxidation and heat-treatment processes made KC8 more able to absorb hydrogen, while similar processes of ammoniation and hydration followed by heat-treatment did not.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 5 , Issue 12 , December 1990 , pp. 2849 - 2853
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Inagaki, M., J. Mater. Res. 4, 1560 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Watanabe, K., Soma, M., Ohnishi, T., and Tamaru, K., Nature Phys. Sci. 233, 160 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Watanabe, K., Kondow, T., Soma, M., Ohnishi, T., and Tamaru, K., Proc. R. Soc. London A333, 51 (1973).Google Scholar
4Terai, T. and Takahashi, Y., J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 18, 643 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Terai, T. and Takahashi, Y., Carbon 22, 91 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Daumas, N. and Hérold, A., Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1971, No. 5, 1598 (1971).Google Scholar
7Akuzawa, N., Fujisawa, T., Amemiya, T., and Takahashi, Y., Synth. Met. 7, 57 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Akuzawa, N., Amemiya, T., and Takahashi, Y., Carbon 24, 295 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Bergbreiter, D. E. and Killough, J. M., J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 913 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Bergbreiter, D. E. and Killough, J. M., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 100, 2126 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Schlögl, R. and Boehm, H. P., Carbon 22, 351 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Boehm, H. P. and Schlögl, R., Carbon 25, 583 (1987).Google Scholar
13Ebert, L. B., Carbon 23, 585 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Ebert, L. B. and Scanlon, J. C., Mater. Res. Bull. XXIII, 413 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Ebert, L. B., Matty, L., Mills, D. R., and Scanlon, J. C., Mater. Res. Bull. XV, 251 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16McRae, E., Billaud, D., Marêché, J. F., and Herold, A., Physica B 99, 489 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Huang, H. H., Fan, Y. B., Solin, S. A., Zhang, J. M., Eklund, P. C., Heremans, J., and Tibetts, G. G., Solid State Commun. 64, 443 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Akuzawa, N., Takei, S., Yoshioka, M., and Takahashi, Y., to be published in Proc. Carbone 90 Paris.Google Scholar
19Akuzawa, N., Kawahara, S., Sakuno, H., Amemiya, T., and Takahashi, Y., Carbon 26, 104 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Jegoudez, J. and Setton, R., Synth. Met. 7, 85 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Beguin, F. and Setton, R., J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1976, 611 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar