Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T17:47:17.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of the metal workpiece properties on the residual stresses in silicon nitride-metal brazed joints

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Pascal J. Yvon
Affiliation:
Institute for Advanced Materials, JRC, Commission of the European Communities, 1755 ZG Petten, The Netherlands
Benoit Marty
Affiliation:
Institute for Advanced Materials, JRC, Commission of the European Communities, 1755 ZG Petten, The Netherlands
Stathis D. Peteves
Affiliation:
Institute for Advanced Materials, JRC, Commission of the European Communities, 1755 ZG Petten, The Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

Modelling, but more importantly, measurements of residual stresses are needed to guide the design and development of high integrity ceramic/metal joints. This study evaluates the influence of the metal workpiece on the residual stress state present in the ceramic part of the joint. Si3N4 was directly bonded via the active metal brazing route to several metals Cu, Mo, W, Ta, Nb, Zr, Ti, and AISI 316, selected to cover an extended range of thermomechanical properties. The residual strains in the joints were measured using an x-ray diffraction technique. The results indicate that the maximum residual stresses scale with the thermal mismatch for metals with low coefficients of thermal expansion. The experimental results are compared with analytical calculations of the residual stresses.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Nicholas, M. G., Joining of Ceramics (Chapman and Hall, London, 1990).Google Scholar
2.Tomsia, A. P., Colloque C7, Suppl. J. de Physique III 3, 1317 (1993).Google Scholar
3.Stephens, J. J., Burchett, S.N., and Hosking, F. M., The Metal Science of Joining, Proc. TMS Fall Meeting, Cincinnati, OH, October, 1991, edited by Cieslak, M. J., Perepezko, J.H., Kang, S., and Glicksman, M. E. (TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1992), p. 285.Google Scholar
4.Stephens, J. J., Burchett, S.N., and Jones, W.B., Advances in Electronic Packaging 1992, Proc. 1992 Joint ASME/JSME Conference on Electronic Packaging, Vol. 1, Milpitas, CA, April, 1992, edited by Chen, W. T. (ASME, New York, 1992), p. 363.Google Scholar
5.Zhou, Y., Ikeuchi, K., North, T.H., and Wang, Z., Metall. Trans. A 22A, 2822 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Iancu, O. T., Munz, D., Eigenmann, B., Scholtes, B., and Macherauch, E., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73, 1144 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Hsueh, C. H. and Evans, A. G., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 68, 241 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Kirchner, H. P., Conway, J. C. Jr, and Seagall, A. E., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 70, 104 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Kobayashi, H., Arai, Y., Nakamura, H., and Sato, T., Mater. Sci. Eng. A143, 91 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Levy, A., Tobin, A., and Busch, G., Metal-Ceramic Joining, Proc. TMS Fall Meeting, Detroit, MI, October, 1990, edited by Kumar, P. and Greenhut, V. A. (TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1991), p. 133.Google Scholar
11.Williamson, R. L., Rabin, B. H., and Drake, J. T., J. Appl. Phys. 74, 1310 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Foley, A. G. and Winters, C. G., Brit. Ceram. Proc. 48, 107 (1991).Google Scholar
13.Yada, T. and Koguchi, H., JSME Int. 34, 163 (1991).Google Scholar
14.Charreyron, P. O., Patten, D. O. Jr, and Miller, B. J., Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc. 10, 1801 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Ahmad, J. and Majumdar, B. S., Fracture Mechanics, 22nd Symposium, Vol. 1, ASTM STP 1131, edited by Ernst, H.A., Saxena, A., and McDowell, D. L. (ASTM, Philadelphia, 1992), p. 590.Google Scholar
16.Haaggblad, H.A., Designing Ceramic Interfaces II: Understanding and tailoring interfaces for coating, composite and joining applications, Proc. 2nd European Colloquium, Petten, The Netherlands, November, 1991, edited by Peteves, S. D. (CEC, DGXIII, Luxembourg, 1993), p. 105.Google Scholar
17.Kurita, M. and Yoneda, K., Computer Methods and Experimental Measurements for Surface Treatment Effects, Proc. 1st Int. Conf. on Computer Methods and Experimental Measurements for Surface Treatment Effects 93, edited by Aliabadi, M. H. and Brebbi, C. A., Comp. Mech. Publ. (Southampton, UK, 1993), p. 29.Google Scholar
18.Murakawa, H. and Ueda, Y., Trans. Jpn. Welding Res. Inst. 20, 1 (1991).Google Scholar
19.Munz, D. and Yang, Y. Y., J. Europ. Ceram. Soc. 13, 453 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Parker, D. A., Designing Interfaces for Technological Applications: Ceramic-Ceramic, Ceramic-Metal Joining, Proc. 1st European Colloquium, Petten, The Netherlands, April, 1988, edited by Peteves, S. D. (Elsevier Appl. Sci., London, UK, 1989), p. 3.Google Scholar
21.Kobayashi, H., Arai, Y., Oguiso, K., Sasaki, K., Sato, T., and Okabe, N., Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Residual Stresses, edited by Fujiwara, H., Abe, T., and Tanaka, K. (Elsevier Appl. Science, London, UK, 1992), p. 893.Google Scholar
22.Tanaka, S-I., Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Residual Stresses, edited by Fujiwara, H., Abe, T., and Tanaka, K. (Elsevier Appl. Science, London, UK, 1992), p. 887.Google Scholar
23.Eigenmann, B., Scholtes, B., and Macherauch, E., Proc. 1st European Ceramic Society Conference, edited by de, G. With, Terpsta, R. A., and Metselaar, R. (Elsevier Appl. Science, London, UK, 1989), p. 3.554.Google Scholar
24.Pintschovius, L., Pyka, N., Kuβmaul, R., Munz, D., Eigenmann, B., and Scholtes, B., Mater. Sci. Eng. A177, 55 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Suganuma, K., Okamoto, T., Koizumi, M., and Kamachi, K., J. Mater. Sci. 22, 3561 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Eigenmann, B., Scholtes, B., and Macherauch, E., Mater. Sci. Eng. A118, 1 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Santella, M. L., Adv. Ceram. Mater. 3, 457 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Kunz, S. C. and Loehman, R. E., Adv. Ceram. Mater. 2, 69 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Chiu, C-C., Mater. Sci. Eng. A150, 139 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30.Dreier, G., Ellsner, G., Schmauder, S., and Suga, T., J. Mater. Sci. 29, 1441 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31.Yamada, T., Yokoi, K., and Kohno, A., J. Mater. Sci. 25, 2188 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32.Smithells Metals Reference Book, edited by Brandes, E. A. (Butterworths, London, UK).Google Scholar
33.Mizuhara, H., Huebel, E., and Oyama, T., Ceram. Bull. 68, 1591 (1989).Google Scholar
34.Salencon, J., Mécanique des Milieux Continus (Ellipses, Paris, 1988).Google Scholar
35.Pradell, T., Glaude, P., Peteves, S.D., and Bullock, E., JRC-Petten Establishment, CEC Technical report 12635 EN (1990).Google Scholar
36.Torbaty, S., Sprauel, J.M., Maeder, G., and Markho, P. H., Adv. X-ray Anal. 26, 245 (1983).Google Scholar
37.Sprauel, J.M. and Castex, L., Proc. 1st Eur. Powder Diffraction Int. Conf. (EPDIC1), München, March 14–16, (1991).Google Scholar
38.Maeder, G., Lebrun, J. L., and Sprauel, J. M., in Matériaux, mise en forme, pièces formées (Ed. du CNRS, Paris, 1989).Google Scholar
39.Noyan, I.C. and Cohen, J.B., Residual Stresses (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1987), p. 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40.Eigenmann, B., Scholtes, B., and Vöhringer, O., cfi/Ber. DKG 66, 364 (1989).Google Scholar
41.Convert, F. and Miege, B., J. Appl. Crystallogr. 25, 384 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42.Moore, M. G. and Evans, W. P., SAE Trans. 66, 340 (1958).Google Scholar
43.Proc. 4th European Ceramic Society Conference, Vol. 9, edited by Tranchina, B. S. and Bellosi, A. (Gruppo Edit. Faenza, Faenza, Italy, 1995), p. 183.Google Scholar
44.Yvon, P. J., Moretto, P., and Peteves, S. D., IAM, JRC Petten, unpublished results (1995).Google Scholar
45.Srinivasan, S., Blau, P. J., and Bjerke, J. L., J. Mater. Res. 10, 95 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46.Frisch, A., Kaysser, W. A., Zhang, W., and Petzow, G., Acta Metall. Mater. 40, S361 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47.Youtsos, A. G., Timke, T., Kiriakopoulos, M., and Ceccone, G., JRC-Petten Establishment, Eur. Report P-Al-94–6 (1994).Google Scholar