Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T03:43:30.351Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of surface treatment on the adhesion of copper to a hybrid polymer material

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

J. Ge ,
M.P.K. Turunen ,
M. Kusevic  and
J.K. Kivilahti
J. Ge*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Electronics Production Technology, Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki, Finland
M.P.K. Turunen
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Electronics Production Technology, Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki, Finland
M. Kusevic
Affiliation:
VTT Electronics, Oulu, Finland
J.K. Kivilahti
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Electronics Production Technology, Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki, Finland
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The effects of various surface pretreatments on the adhesion of electroless and sputter-deposited copper metallizations to a hybrid polymer material were investigated. Without pretreatment, the adhesion between copper and the polymer was virtually zero. The adhesion of electroless copper to the polymer was poor regardless of the pretreatment used. However, the wet-chemical pretreatment of the polymer surface markedly increased the adhesion of sputtered copper to the polymer. It preferentially removed the inorganic part of the polymer and formed micropores on the surface. The plasma and reactive ion etching pretreatments, in turn, selectively etched away the organic part of the polymer and noticeably increased the hydrophilicity. Although this resulted in even higher increase in the surface free energy than was achieved with the chemical treatment, the granular surfaces became mechanically brittle. With the help of x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy, and contact-angle measurements and with the recently developed pull test, the physicochemical changes of the wet-chemically pretreated polymer surfaces were demonstrated to have significant effects on the adhesion.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 18 , Issue 11 , November 2003 , pp. 2697 - 2707
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Kivilahti, J.K., Liu, J., Morris, J.E., Suga, T., and Wong, C.P., in Proceedings of the 52nd IEEE Electronic Component and Technology Conference, edited by Mcshane, M. and Bezuk, S. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2002), p. 955.Google Scholar
2.Tuominen, R. and Kivilahti, J.K., in Proceeding of the International Conference on the 4th Adhesive Joining & Coating Technology in Electronics Manufacturing, edited by Hyytiainen, M. (Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, NY, 2000), p. 269.Google Scholar
3.Towle, S.N., Braunisch, H., Hu, C., Emery, R.D, and Gilroy, J.V., in ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition, edited by Scott, E.P. and Bischof, J.C. (American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, 2001), p. 211.Google Scholar
4.Waris, T.F., Tuominen, R., and Kivilahti, J.K., in Proceedings of the 1st International IEEE Conference on Polymers and Adhesives in Microelectronics and Photonics, edited by Kruse, N., Nieland, C., and Wenzel, R. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2001), p. 218.Google Scholar
5.Griese, E., IEEE Trans. Adv. Packag. 24, 375 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Liu, Y.S., Wojnarowski, R.J., Hennessy, W.A., Rowlette, J., Stack, J., Kadar-Kallen, M., Green, E., Liu, Y., Bristow, J.P., Peczalski, A., Eldada, L., Yardley, J., Osgood, R.M., Scarmozzino, R., Lee, S.H., and Patra, S., in Proceedings of 47th IEEE Electronic Component and Technology Conference, edited by Vardaman, E.J. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 1997), p. 391.Google Scholar
7.Schmieder, K. and Wolter, K-J., in Proceedings of the 50th IEEE Electronic Component and Technology Conference, edited by Reynolds, T.G. III and Mcshane, M. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2000), p. 749.Google Scholar
8.Brinker, C.J. and Scherer, G.W., Sol-Gel Science, the Physics and Chemistry of Sol-Gel Processing (Academic Press, New York, 1990).Google Scholar
9.Bradley, D.C., Mehrotra, R.C., and Gaul, D.P., Metal Alkoxides (Academic Press, New York, 1978).Google Scholar
10.Ge, J. and Kivilahti, J.K., J. Appl. Phys. 92, 3007 (2002).Google Scholar
11.Ge, J., Turunen, M.P.K., and Kivilahti, J.K., J. Polym. Sci. Part B: Polym. Phys. 41, 623 (2003).Google Scholar
12.Ge, J., Turunen, M.P.K., and Kivilahti, J.K., Thin Solid Films 440, 198 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Coombs, C.F., Coombs' Printed Circuits Handbook (McGraw-Hill, New York, 2001).Google Scholar
14.Harper, C.A., High Performance Printed Circuit Boards (McGraw-Hill, New York, 2000).Google Scholar
15.Heinz, R., Klusmann, E., Meyer, H., and Schulz, R., Surf. Coat. Tech. 116–119, 886 (1999).Google Scholar
16.Heuven, J.H.C. Van, IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 22, 841 (1974).Google Scholar
17.Harth, K. and Hibst, H., Surf. Coat. Technol. 59, 350 (1993).Google Scholar
18.Egitto, F.D. and Matienzo, L.J., IBM J. Res. Develop. 38, 423 (1994).Google Scholar
19.Ge, J., Tuominen, R., and Kivilahti, J.K., J. Adhes. Sci. Tech. 15, 1133 (2001).Google Scholar
20.Owens, D.K. and Wendt, R.C., J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 13, 1741 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Turunen, M.P.K., Laurila, T., and Kivilahti, J.K., J. Polym. Sci. Part B: Polym. Phys. 40, 2137 (2002).Google Scholar
22.Weast, C., CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1982).Google Scholar
23.Hollahan, J.R. and Bell, A.T., Techniques and Application of Plasma Chemistry (Wiley, New York, 1974).Google Scholar
24.d'Agostino, D.R., Plasma Deposition, Treatment, and Etching of Polymers (Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1990).Google Scholar
25.Manos, D.M. and Flamm, D.L., Plasma Etching - An introduction (Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1989).Google Scholar
26.Beamson, G. and Briggs, D., High Resolution XPS of Organic Polymers (Wiley, Chichester, 1993).Google Scholar
27.Good, R.J. and Stromberg, R.R., Techniques of Measuring Contact Angles, Surface and Colloid Science (Plenum Press, New York, 1979).Google Scholar
28.Swain, P.S. and Lipowsky, R., Langmuir 14, 6772 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Drelich, J., Miller, J.D., and Good, R.J., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 179, 37 (1996).Google Scholar
30.Palasantzas, G. and Hosson, J.M., Acta Mater. 49, 3533 (2001).Google Scholar
31.Lawrence, J., Li, L., and Spencer, J.T., Appl. Surf. Sci. 138–139, 388 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32.Kaelble, D.H. and Uy, K.C., J. Adhes. 2, 50 (1970).Google Scholar
33.Mittal, K.L. and Anderson, H.R., Acid-Base Interactions (VPS, Utrecht, 1991).Google Scholar
34.Burkstrand, J.M., J. Appl. Phys. 52, 4795 (1981).Google Scholar
35.Friedrich, J.F., Unger, W.E.S., Lippitz, A., Koprinarov, I., Kuhn, G., Weidner, S., and Vogel, L., Surf. Coat. Technol. 116–119, 772 (1999).Google Scholar
36.Martin, L.J. and Wong, C.P., IEEE Trans. Compon. Packaging Technol. 24, 416 (2001).Google Scholar
37.Sacher, E., Pireaux, J.J., and Kowalczyk, S.P., Metallization of Polymers, ACS Symposium Series 440 (ACS, New York, 1990).Google Scholar
38.Sapiela, S., Cerny, J., Klemberg-Sapiela, J.E., and Martinu, L., J. Adhes. 42, 91 (1993).Google Scholar