Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T06:06:32.933Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of precursor additives on the stability of plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposited a-GeC(O):H films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

A. Grill ,
S. Guilley ,
V. Patel  and
K. Babich
A. Grill
Affiliation:
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598
S. Guilley
Affiliation:
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598
V. Patel
Affiliation:
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598
K. Babich
Affiliation:
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598
Get access

Abstract

Germanium- and carbon-based films were deposited by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition from tetramethylgermane (TMGe) with additions of oxygen, hydrogen, or argon. The index of refraction, extinction coefficient, and optical gap and Fourier transform infrared spectra of the films were measured as well as their stability in regular ambiance. It was found that the films deposited from pure TMGe were stable in time only if deposited at a negative bias above −250 V direct current. Films deposited at a bias of −150 V direct current could be stabilized by significant additions of oxygen to the plasma and complete stabilization was achieved at O2/TMGe ratios larger than 3 in the gas feed when GeOx films containing small amounts of C and H were obtained. Additions of hydrogen or argon to TMGe had only slight effects in improving the stability off the films.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , February 2002 , pp. 367 - 375
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Saito, N., Yamaguchi, T., and Nakaaki, I., J. Appl. Phys. 78, 3949 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Marques, F., Vilcarromero, J., and Lacerda, R.G., Appl. Phys. A 71, 633 (2000).Google Scholar
3.Catherine, Y. and Turban, G., Thin Solid Films 70, 101 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.White, S.B. and McKenzie, D.R., J. Appl. Phys. 68, 3194 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Tyczkowski, J., Kazimierski, P., and Szymanowski, H., Thin Solid Films 241, 291 (1993).Google Scholar
6.Gazicki, M., Szymanowski, H., and Tyczkowski, J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 14, 2835 (1996).Google Scholar
7.Tyczkowski, J. and Ledzion, R., J. Appl. Phys. 86, 4412 (1999).Google Scholar
8.Grill, A., Cold Plasma in Materials Fabrication: From Fundamentals to Applications (IEEE Press, New York, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Forouhi, A.R. and Bloomer, I., Rev. B 34, 7018 (1986).Google Scholar
10.Weast, R.C., CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1987).Google Scholar
11.Gazicki, M., Szymanowski, H., Tyczkowski, J., Malinovsky, L., Schalko, J., and Fallmann, W., Thin Solid Films 256, 31 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Avni, R., Carmi, U., Rosenthal, I., Manory, R., and Grill, A., Thin Solid Films 107, 235 (1983).Google Scholar
13. Aldrich Chemical Company, Milwaukee, WI, Infrared Correlation Chart.Google Scholar
14.Grill, A. and Meyerson, B.S., in Synthetic Diamond: Emerging CVD Science and Technology, edited by Spear, K.E. and Dismukes, J.P. (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1994), Chap. 5.Google Scholar
15.Gopalakrishnamurthy, H.S., Rao, R. Subba, and Kutty, T.R. Narayan. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 37, 891 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Maisel, L.I. and Glang, R., Handbook of Thin Film Technology (Mc-Graw Hill, New York, 1983).Google Scholar
17.Grill, A., Perraud, L., Patel, V., Jahnes, C., and Cohen, S., in Low-Dielectric Constant Materials V, edited by Hummel, J., Endo, K., Lee, W.W., Mills, M., and Wang, S.Q. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 565, Warrendale, PA, 1999), p. 107.Google Scholar