Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T12:29:13.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Interface Conditions on Yield Behavior of Passivated Copper Thin Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Richard P. Vinci
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Lehigh University, 520 Brodhead Avenue, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015
Stefanie A. Forrest
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305
John C. Bravman
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305
Get access

Abstract

Wafer curvature was used to study the thermal–mechanical behavior of 1-μm Cu thin films capped with a 100-nm-thick Si3N4 layer. These films were grown with either a Ta or a Si3N4 underlayer. Films on Si3N4 that were exposed to oxygen at the film/capping layer interface or at the center of the copper layer exhibited Bauschinger-like yielding at low stress. Stacks deposited under continuous vacuum, with a Ta underlayer, with carbon exposure at the upper surface of the copper film, or with oxygen exposure of only the underlayer did not demonstrate the anomalous yielding. Preferential diffusion of oxygen into copper grain boundaries or interfaces is the likely cause of the early yield behavior. Possible mechanisms include an increase in interface adhesion due to the presence of oxygen in solution and diffusion-induced dislocation glide as an additional driving force for dislocation motion at low applied stress.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Vinci, R.P., Zielinski, E.M., and Bravman, J.C., Thin Solid Films 262, 142 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thouless, M.D., Gupta, J., and Harper, J.M.E., J. Mater. Res. 8, 1845 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, H., Zhang, L., Nix, W.D., Thompson, C.V., and Arzt, E., Acta Mater. 47, 2865 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, S.P., Keller, R-M., and Arzt, E., in Thin-Films: Stresses and Mechanical Properties VII, edited by Cammarata, R.C., Busso, E.P., Nastasi, M., and Oliver, W.C. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 505, Pittsburgh, PA, 1998), p. 605.Google Scholar
Keller, R-M., Bader, S., Vinci, R.P., and Arzt, E., in Thin-Films: Stresses and Mechanical Properties V, edited by Baker, S.P., Ross, C.A., Townsend, P.H., Volkert, C.A., and Borgesen, P. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 356, Pittsburgh, PA, 1995), p. 453.Google Scholar
Nix, W.D., Met. Trans. 20A, 2217 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, C.V., J. Mater. Res. 8, 237 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flinn, P.A., J. Mater. Res. 6, 1498 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müllner, P.A. and Arzt, E., in Thin-Films: Stresses and Mechanical Properties VII, edited by Cammarata, R.C., Busso, E.P., Nastasi, M., and Oliver, W.C. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 505, Pittsburgh, PA, 1998), p. 149.Google Scholar
Keller, R-M., Baker, S.P., and Arzt, E., J. Mater. Res. 13, 1307 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nieh, T.G. and Nix, W.D., Met. Trans. 12A, 893 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, S.P. (2001, personal communication).Google Scholar
Ma, Q., Fujimoto, H., Flinn, P., Jain, V., F. Adibi-Rizi, Moghadam, F., and Dauskardt, R.H., in Materials Reliability in Microelectronics V, edited by Oates, A.S., Filter, W.F., Rosenberg, R., Greer, A.L., and Gadepally, K. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 391, Pittsburgh, PA, 1995), p. 91.Google Scholar
Kirchheim, R., Acta Met. 27, 869 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobrinski, M.J. and Thompson, C.V., Acta Mater. 48, 625 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shewmon, P.G., Meyrick, G., Mishra, S., and Parthasarathy, T.A., Scr. Met. 17, 1231 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J.C.M., Park, C.G., and Ohr, S.M., Scr. Met. 20, 371 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar