Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T08:28:48.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of core–shell particles on the mechanical performance of epoxy resins modified with hyperbranched polymers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2016

Shuiping Li
Affiliation:
School of Materials Engineering, Yancheng Institute of Technology, Jiangsu Yancheng, 224051, People's Republic of China; and College of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Jiangsu Nanjing, 210094, People's Republic of China
Qing Lin
Affiliation:
School of Materials Engineering, Jinling Institute of Technology, Jiangsu Nanjing, 211169, People's Republic of China
Chong Cui*
Affiliation:
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Jiangsu Nanjing, 210094, People's Republic of China
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

A novel core–shell particle that consists of epoxide-terminated hyperbranched polymer (HBP) and silica nanoparticles was incorporated into an epoxy/hydroxyl-terminated HBP blend to fabricate a high-performance epoxy thermoset. The effect of the core–shell particle content on the mechanical properties of the epoxy thermosets was investigated in detail. Results from tensile, flexural, and impact tests are provided. The impact fracture surface was studied by field emission-scanning electron microscopy. The incorporation of 2 wt% core–shell particles improved the tensile strength, percent elongation at break, flexural strength, and impact resistance of epoxy/hydroxyl-terminated HBP thermosets. Field emission-scanning electron micrographs showed that core–shell particle addition resulted in large-scale shear deformation and debonding from the epoxy matrix, and improved the epoxy resin toughness.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Azeez, A.A., Rhee, K.Y., Park, S.J., and Hui, D.: Epoxy clay nanocomposites—Processing, properties and applications: A review. Composites, Part B 45(1), 308320 (2013).Google Scholar
Zaioncz, S., Silva, A.A., Sirqueira, A.S., and Soares, B.G.: Toughening of epoxy resin by methyl methacrylate/2-ethylhexyl acrylate copolymers: The effect of copolymer composition. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 292(12), 12631270 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeCarli, M., Kozielski, K., Tian, W., and Varley, R.: Toughening of a carbon fibre reinforced epoxy anhydride composite using an epoxy terminated hyperbranched modifier. Compos. Sci. Technol. 65(14), 21562166 (2005).Google Scholar
Domun, N., Hadavinia, H., Zhang, T., Sainsbury, T., Liaghat, G.H., and Vahid, S.: Improving the fracture toughness and the strength of epoxy using nanomaterials—A review of the current status. Nanoscale 7(23), 1029410329 (2015).Google Scholar
Kar, S. and Banthia, A.K.: Synthesis and evaluation of liquid amine-terminated polybutadiene rubber and its role in epoxy toughening. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 96(6), 24462453 (2005).Google Scholar
Tang, L-C., Wang, X., Wan, Y-J., Wu, L-B., Jiang, J-X., and Lai, G-Q.: Mechanical properties and fracture behaviors of epoxy composites with multi-scale rubber particles. Mater. Chem. Phys. 141(1), 333342 (2013).Google Scholar
Hazot, P., Pichot, C., and Maazouz, A.: Synthesis of hairy acrylic core–shell particles as toughening agents for epoxy networks. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 201(6), 632641 (2000).Google Scholar
Sprenger, S., Kothmann, M.H., and Altstaedt, V.: Carbon fiber-reinforced composites using an epoxy resin matrix modified with reactive liquid rubber and silica nanoparticles. Compos. Sci. Technol. 105, 8695 (2014).Google Scholar
Dorigato, A., Pegoretti, A., and Quaresimin, M.: Thermo-mechanical characterization of epoxy/clay nanocomposites as matrices for carbon/nanoclay/epoxy laminates. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 528(19–20), 63246333 (2011).Google Scholar
Crespo, M., González, M., and Pozuelo, J.: Magnetic silica:epoxy composites with a nano- and micro-scale control. Mater. Chem. Phys. 144(3), 335342 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinloch, A.J., Masania, K., Taylor, A.C., Sprenger, S., and Egan, D.: The fracture of glass-fibre-reinforced epoxy composites using nanoparticle-modified matrices. J. Mater. Sci. 43(3), 11511154 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bray, D.J., Dittanet, P., Guild, F.J., Kinloch, A.J., Masania, K., Pearson, R.A., and Taylor, A.C.: The modelling of the toughening of epoxy polymers via silica nanoparticles: The effects of volume fraction and particle size. Polymer 54(26), 70227032 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackman, B.R.K., Kinloch, A.J., Lee, J.S., Taylor, A.C., Agarwal, R., Schueneman, G., and Sprenger, S.: The fracture and fatigue behaviour of nano-modified epoxy polymers. J. Mater. Sci. 42(16), 70497051 (2007).Google Scholar
Ilyin, S.O., Brantseva, T.V., Gorbunova, I.Y., Antonov, S.V., Korolev, Y.M., and Kerber, M.L.: Epoxy reinforcement with silicate particles: Rheological and adhesive properties—Part I: Characterization of composites with natural and organically modified montmorillonites. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 61, 127136 (2015).Google Scholar
Pan, A. and He, L.: Formation and properties of core–shell pentablock copolymer/silica hybrids. Mater. Chem. Phys. 147(1–2), 510 (2014).Google Scholar
Zeng, Z., Yu, J., and Guo, Z-X.: Preparation of epoxy-functionalized polystyrene/silica core–shell composite nanoparticles. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 42(9), 22532262 (2004).Google Scholar
Kinloch, A.J., Mohammed, R.D., Taylor, A.C., Eger, C., Sprenger, S., and Egan, D.: The effect of silica nano particles and rubber particles on the toughness of multiphase thermosetting epoxy polymers. J. Mater. Sci. 40(18), 50835086 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, J., Li, J., Zhao, S., Benicewicz, B.C., Hillborg, H., and Schadler, L.S.: Effect of graft density and molecular weight on mechanical properties of rubbery block copolymer grafted SiO2 nanoparticle toughened epoxy. Polymer 54(15), 39613973 (2013).Google Scholar
Sharma, S.P. and Lakkad, S.C.: Impact behavior and fractographic study of carbon nanotubes grafted carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy matrix multi-scale hybrid composites. Composites, Part A 69, 124131 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Im, H. and Kim, J.: Thermal conductivity of a graphene oxide-carbon nanotube hybrid/epoxy composite. Carbon 50(15), 54295440 (2012).Google Scholar
Jiang, T., Kuila, T., Kim, N.H., Ku, B-C., and Lee, J.H.: Enhanced mechanical properties of silanized silica nanoparticle attached graphene oxide/epoxy composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 79, 115125 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jia, X., Liu, B., Huang, L., Hui, D., and Yang, X.: Numerical analysis of synergistic reinforcing effect of silica nanoparticle–MWCNT hybrid on epoxy-based composites. Composites, Part B 54, 133137 (2013).Google Scholar
Li, W., He, D., and Bai, J.: The influence of nano/micro hybrid structure on the mechanical and self-sensing properties of carbon nanotube-microparticle reinforced epoxy matrix composite. Composites, Part A 54, 2836 (2013).Google Scholar
Ahmad, T., Ahmad, R., Kamran, M., Wahjoedi, B., Shakoor, I., Hussain, F., Riaz, F., Jamil, Z., Isaac, S., and Ashraf, Q.: Effect of Thal silica sand nanoparticles and glass fiber reinforcements on epoxy-based hybrid composite. Iran. Polym. J. 24(1), 2127 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quan, D. and Ivankovic, A.: Effect of core–shell rubber (CSR) nano-particles on mechanical properties and fracture toughness of an epoxy polymer. Polymer 66, 1628 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, J., Kinloch, A.J., Sprenger, S., and Taylor, A.C.: The mechanical properties and toughening mechanisms of an epoxy polymer modified with polysiloxane-based core–shell particles. Polymer 54(16), 42764289 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naguib, M., Grassini, S., and Sangermano, M.: Core/shell PBA/PMMA–PGMA nanoparticles to enhance the impact resistance of UV-cured epoxy systems. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 298(1), 106112 (2013).Google Scholar
Meng, Y., Zhang, X-H., Du, B-Y., Zhou, B-X., Zhou, X., and Qi, G-R.: Thermosets with core–shell nanodomain by incorporation of core crosslinked star polymer into epoxy resin. Polymer 52(2), 391399 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quan, D. and Ivankovic, A.: Effect of core–shell rubber (CSR) nano-particles on mechanical properties and fracture toughness of an epoxy polymer. Polymer 66, 1628 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Su, Z., Yu, B., Jiang, X., and Yin, J.: Hybrid core–shell microspheres from coassembly of anthracene-containing POSS (POSS-AN) and anthracene-ended hyperbranched poly(ether amine) (hPEA-AN) and their responsive polymeric hollow microspheres. Macromolecules 46(9), 35193528 (2013).Google Scholar
Yang, P., Zhu, L.Y., Xia, X., Wang, H.T., Du, Q.G., and Zhong, W.: Toughening of epoxy resin with poly(methyl methacrylate) grafted silica core–shell particles. e-Polym. 11, 710721 (2011).Google Scholar
Thakur, S. and Karak, N.: Ultratough, ductile, castor oil-based, hyperbranched, polyurethane nanocomposite using functionalized reduced graphene oxide. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2(5), 11951202 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan, L., Lu, S., Xiao, X., He, Z., Zeng, C., Gao, J., and Yu, J.: Enhanced mechanical and thermal properties of epoxy with hyperbranched polyester grafted perylene diimide. RSC Adv. 5(5), 31773186 (2015).Google Scholar
Tomuta, A., Ferrando, F., Serra, À., and Ramis, X.: New aromatic–aliphatic hyperbranched polyesters with vinylic end groups of different length as modifiers of epoxy/anhydride thermosets. React. Funct. Polym. 72(9), 556563 (2012).Google Scholar
Allauddin, S., Akhil Chandran, M.K., Jena, K.K., Narayan, R., and Raju, K.V.S.N.: Synthesis and characterization of APTMS/melamine cured hyperbranched polyester-epoxy hybrid coatings. Prog. Org. Coat. 76(10), 14021412 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, S., Cui, C., Hou, H., Wu, Q., and Zhang, S.: The effect of hyperbranched polyester and zirconium slag nanoparticles on the impact resistance of epoxy resin thermosets. Composites, Part B 79, 342350 (2015).Google Scholar
Li, S., Cui, C., and Hou, H.: Synthesis of core–shell particles based on hyperbranced polyester and zirconium slag nanoparticles and its influence on the impact resistance of epoxy resin thermosets. Polym. Compos. (2015). doi: 10.1002/pc.23602.Google Scholar
Li, S., Lin, Q., Zhu, H., Hou, H., Li, Y., Wu, Q., and Cui, C.: Improved mechanical properties of epoxy-based composites with hyperbranched polymer grafting glass-fiber. Polym. Adv. Technol. (2016). doi: 10.1002/pat.3746.Google Scholar
Huang, X., Heo, M.S., Yoo, J-W., Choi, J-S., and Kim, I.: Hyperbranched aliphatic polyether esters by ring-opening polymerization of epoxidized 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 52(12), 16431651 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y., Zhang, D., Qin, C., and Xu, J.: Physical and mechanical properties of dental nanocomposites composed of aliphatic epoxy resin and epoxidized aromatic hyperbranched polymers. Polym. Compos. 30(2), 176181 (2009).Google Scholar
Yu, J., Huang, X., Wu, C., Wu, X., Wang, G., and Jiang, P.: Interfacial modification of boron nitride nanoplatelets for epoxy composites with improved thermal properties. Polymer 53(2), 471480 (2012).Google Scholar
Xie, L., Huang, X., Huang, Y., Yang, K., and Jiang, P.: Core–shell structured hyperbranched aromatic polyamide/BaTiO3 hybrid filler for poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene-chlorofluoroethylene) nanocomposites with the dielectric constant comparable to that of percolative composites. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 5(5), 17471756 (2013).Google Scholar
Qian, R., Yu, J., Xie, L., Li, Y., and Jiang, P.: Efficient thermal properties enhancement to hyperbranched aromatic polyamide grafted aluminum nitride in epoxy composites. Polym. Adv. Technol. 24(3), 348356 (2013).Google Scholar
Lv, S., Yuan, Y., and Shi, W.: Strengthening and toughening effects of layered double hydroxide and hyperbranched polymer on epoxy resin. Prog. Org. Coat. 65(4), 425430 (2009).Google Scholar
Wang, R.P., Schuman, T., Vuppalapati, R.R., and Chandrashekhara, K.: Fabrication of bio-based epoxy–clay nanocomposites. Green Chem. 16(4), 18711882 (2014).Google Scholar
Qi, B., Zhang, Q.X., Bannister, M., and Mai, Y.W.: Investigation of the mechanical properties of DGEBA-based epoxy resin with nanoclay additives. Compos. Struct. 75(1–4), 514519 (2006).Google Scholar
Wang, X., Xiao, K., Ye, L., Mai, Y-W., Wang, C.H., and Rose, L.R.F.: Modelling mechanical properties of core–shell rubber-modified epoxies. Acta Mater. 48(2), 579586 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srivastava, V.K.: Modeling and mechanical performance of carbon nanotube/epoxy resin composites. Mater. Des. 39, 432436 (2012).Google Scholar
Zhang, J. and Jiang, D.: Interconnected multi-walled carbon nanotubes reinforced polymer–matrix composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 71(4), 466470 (2011).Google Scholar
Thitsartarn, W., Fan, X., Sun, Y., Yeo, J.C.C., Yuan, D., and He, C.: Simultaneous enhancement of strength and toughness of epoxy using POSS–rubber core–shell nanoparticles. Compos. Sci. Technol. 118, 6371 (2015).Google Scholar
Buonocore, G.G., Schiavo, L., Attianese, I., and Borriello, A.: Hyperbranched polymers as modifiers of epoxy adhesives. Composites, Part B 53, 187192 (2013).Google Scholar