Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:32:39.028Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dynamic tensile strength of polyurea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2011

George Youssef
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095
Vijay Gupta*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Dynamic tensile strength of polyurea is measured at an ultrahigh strain rate of 1.67 × 107 s−1 by generating spall failures inside thick polyurea coatings bonded to steel plates using laser-generated stress waves of several nanoseconds in duration. Specifically, thick polyurea films were cast on a steel plate whose backside was provided with water glass–covered Al film. The Al film was melted by focusing a high-energy Nd:YAG laser pulse over 3-mm-diameter area. Exfoliation of the Al generated a compressive stress wave toward the polyurea coating, which turned tensile upon reflection from the free surface. At a threshold laser energy, the amplitude of the returning tensile stress wave exceeded the dynamic tensile strength of polyurea. The stress wave profile inside the steel plate was interferometrically recorded at the threshold laser fluence and was used in a wave mechanics simulation to calculate the peak tensile stress. The polyurea was modeled as a viscoelastic solid.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Barsoum, G.S. and Dudt, P.J.: The fascinating behaviors of ordinary materials under dynamic conditions. AMMTIAC Q. 4, 11 (2010).Google Scholar
2.Gupta, V., Argon, A.S., Parks, D.M., and Cornie, J.A.: Measurement of interface strength by a laser spallation technique. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 40, 141 (1992).Google Scholar
3.Gupta, V., Yuan, J., and Pronin, A.N.: Nanosecond rise time laser produced stress pulses with no asymptotic decay. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 64, 1611 (1993).Google Scholar
4.Gupta, V., Yuan, J., and Pronin, A.N.: Recent developments in the laser spallation technique to measure the interface strength and its relationship to interface toughness with applications to metal/ceramic, ceramic/ceramic and ceramic/polymer interfaces. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 8, 713 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Gupta, V., Kireev, V., Yoshida, H., and Akahoshi, H.: Glass-modified stress waves for adhesion measurement of ultra thin films for device applications. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 51, 1395 (2003).Google Scholar
6.Gupta, V., Wu, J., and Pronin, A.N.: Effect of substrate orientation and deposition mode on the tensile strength and toughness of Nb/sapphire interfaces. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 80, 3172 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Wu, H., Basu, S.N., Kireev, V., and Gupta, V.: The effect of structure and chemistry on the strength of FeCrAl(Y)/sapphire interfaces: II. Strength of interfaces. Mater. Sci. Eng. 349, 265 (2003).Google Scholar
8.Jain, A.: Strength/moisture relationship for interfaces and joints for robust prediction of reliability. PhD dissertation, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA (2007).Google Scholar
9.Jain, A., Gupta, V., and Basu, S.N.: A quantitative study of moisture adsorption in polyimide and its effect on the strength of the polyimide/silicon-nitride interface. Acta Mater. 53, 3147 (2005).Google Scholar
10.Wang, X., Gupta, V., and Basu, S.N.: Effects of substrate orientation and metal film thickness on the intrinsic strength, intrinsic fracture energy, and total fracture energy of tantalum-sapphire interfaces. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 88, 1909 (2006).Google Scholar
11.Youssef, G. and Gupta, V.: Fracture toughness of polyurea. J. Mech. Mater. (submitted for publication).Google Scholar
12.Youssef, G. and Gupta, V.: Dynamic response of polyurea subjected to nanosecond rise-time stress waves. J. Mech. Time Depend. Mater. (accepted for publication).Google Scholar
13.Zhao, J., Knauss, W.G., and Ravichandran, G.: Applicability of the time–temperature superposition principle in modeling dynamic response of a polyurea. J. Mech. Time Depend. Mater. 11, 289 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Ready, J.F.: Effect of High-Power Laser Radiation (American Press, Inc., New York, 1971), pp. 109, 123.Google Scholar
15.Youssef, G.H.: Dynamic properties of polyurea. PhD dissertation, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA (2010).Google Scholar
16.Kim, H.: In-situ measurement of intrinsic interface strength and moisture-effected interfacial fracture energy. PhD dissertation, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA (2008).Google Scholar
17.Amirkhizi, A.V., Isaacs, J., McGee, J., and Nemat-Nasser, S.: An experimentally-based viscoelastic constitutive model for polyurea, including pressure and temperature effects. Philos. Mag. 86, 5847 (2006).Google Scholar
18.Sarva, S., Deschanel, S., Boyce, M., and Chen, W.: Stress-strain behavior of a polyurea and a polyurethane from low to high strain rates. Polymer 48, 2208 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Yi, J., Boyce, M.C., Lee, G.F., and Balizer, E.: Large deformation rate-dependent stress–strain behavior of polyurea and polyurethanes. Polymer 47, 319 (2006).Google Scholar
20.Roland, C.M., Twigg, J.N., Vu, Y., and Mott, P.H.: High strain rate mechanical behavior of polyurea. Polymer 48, 574 (2007).Google Scholar
21.Knauss, W.G. and Zhao, J.: Improved relaxation time coverage in ramp-strain histories. J. Mech. Time Depend. Mater. 11, 199 (2007).Google Scholar
22.Jiao, T., Clifton, R.J., and Grunschel, S.E.: Pressure-sensitivity and tensile strength of an elastomer at high strain rates. AIP Conf. Proc. Shock Compression Condens. Matter 955, 707 (2007).Google Scholar