Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T15:17:12.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Doping effects on coarsening of Y2BaCuO5 phase in liquid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Teruo Izumi ,
Yuichi Nakamura  and
Yuh Shiohara
Teruo Izumi
Affiliation:
Superconductivity Research Laboratory, ISTEC, 1-10-13 Shinonome, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135, Japan
Yuichi Nakamura
Affiliation:
Superconductivity Research Laboratory, ISTEC, 1-10-13 Shinonome, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135, Japan
Yuh Shiohara
Affiliation:
Superconductivity Research Laboratory, ISTEC, 1-10-13 Shinonome, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135, Japan
Get access

Abstract

The coarsening rate of Y2BaCuO5 (211) phase in liquid was investigated by observations of samples which were held at 1070 °C for different holding times. The 211 phase formed rod-like shapes, and the diameters increased with the increase in the holding time. The average diameter increased in proportion to t1/3 (t, holding time). This means that coarsening can be explained by the modified Ostwald ripening theory. Platinum-doping suppressed the coarsening rate and alumina-doping promoted it. However, both coarsening rates were also proportional to t1/3. The changes in the rate can be represented by the changes of the DLΓ value (DL, diffusivity in liquid and Γ, Gibbs—Thomson coefficient) using the Ostwald ripening theory; i.e., the value is made lower by platinum-doping and higher by alumina-doping.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 8 , Issue 6 , June 1993 , pp. 1240 - 1246
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Murakami, M., Morita, M., Doi, K., and Miyamoto, K., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 28, 1189 (1989).Google Scholar
2Fujimoto, H., Murakami, M., Gotoh, S., Oyama, T., Shiohara, Y., Koshizuka, N., and Tanaka, S., Advances in Superconductivity II (Springer-Verlag, Tokyo, 1990), p. 285.Google Scholar
3Ogawa, N., Hirabayashi, I., and Tanaka, S., Physica C 177, 101 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Morita, M., Tanaka, M., Takebayashi, S., Kimura, K., Miyamoto, K., and Sawano, K., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 30, 813 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Izumi, T., Nakamura, Y., Sung, T-H., and Shiohara, Y., J. Mater. Res. 7, 801 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Ohtsu, K., Yamada, Y., and Shiohara, Y., Extended Abstract of ISTEC Workshop '92, unpublished.Google Scholar
7Xu, Y., Sabatini, R. L., Moodenbaugh, A. R., Zuh, Y., Shyu, S. G., and Suenaga, M., Physica C 3, 205 (1990).Google Scholar
8Greenwood, G. W., Acta Metall. 4, 243 (1956).Google Scholar
9Lifshitz, I. M. and Slyozov, V. V., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 19, 35 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Wanger, C., Z. Elektrochem. 65, 581 (1961).Google Scholar
11Brook, R.J., Treatise Mater. Sci. Technol. 9, 331 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar