Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T04:52:31.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Distribution of intercalant in copper chloride and iron chloride graphite intercalation compounds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2012

Shinn-Shyong Tzeng  and
Mei-Hsueh Nien
Shinn-Shyong Tzeng
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Engineering, Tatung Institute of Technology, Taipei, Taiwan 104, Republic of China
Mei-Hsueh Nien
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Engineering, Tatung Institute of Technology, Taipei, Taiwan 104, Republic of China
Get access

Extract

CuCl2 and FeCl3 graphite intercalation compounds were prepared by a gas phase reaction method using different carbon host materials. The effect of the microstructure of carbon host materials on the amount of intercalation and the distribution of intercalant was investigated using x-ray diffraction and electron microprobe analysis. For a fiber sample with a core region of onion skin structure in the cross section, a lower concentration of intercalant was measured in the core region. For fiber samples with an oriented-core transverse microtexture, different intercalant distributions along the long axis (oriented-core direction) and the short axis of the elliptical cross section were found.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , January 1999 , pp. 302 - 307
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Dresselhaus, M. S., Dresselhaus, G., Sugihara, K., Spain, I. L., and Goldberg, H.A., Graphite Fibers and Filaments (Springer Series in Materials Science, Vol. 5, Springer, Berlin, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Jaworske, D.A., Gaier, J. R., Hung, C.C., and Banks, B.A., SAMPE Q. 18, 9 (1986).Google Scholar
3.Endo, M., Yamanashi, H., Doll, G.L., and Dresselhaus, M.S., J. Appl. Phys. 64, 2995 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Gaier, J. R. and Slabe, M.E., Carbon 28, 669 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Speck, J. S., Endo, M., and Dresselhaus, M.S., J. Cryst. Growth 94, 834 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Ho, C.T. and Chung, D.D.L, Carbon 28, 831 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Inagaki, M. and Wang, Z.D., Carbon 30, 869 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Lan, G., Liu, D., and Wang, H., Carbon 30, 961 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Gaier, J. R. and Jaworske, D.A., Synth. Met. 12, 525 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Gaier, J. R., Slabe, M. E., and Shaffer, N., Carbon 26, 381 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Fitz Gerald, J. D., Pennock, J. D., and Taylor, G. H., Carbon 29, 139 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Matsumoto, T., Pure Appl. Chem. 57, 1553 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Coleman, L.B., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 46, 1125 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Tzeng, S-S. and Diefendorf, R. J., in Extended Abstracts of 19th Biennial Conf. on Carbon (American Carbon Society, University Park, PA, 1989), p. 298.Google Scholar
15.Perry, A. J., Ineichen, B., and Eliasson, B., J. Mater. Sci. 9, 1376 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Flandrois, S., Masson, J-M., Rouillon, J-C., Gaultier, J., and Hauw, C., Synth. Met. 3, 1 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Unpublished work.Google Scholar
18.Endo, M., J. Mater. Sci. 23, 598 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Shioya, J., Yamaguchi, Y., Mizoguchi, A., Ueba, Y., and Matsubara, H., in Extended Abstracts of 17th Biennial Conf. on Carbon (American Carbon Society, University Park, PA, 1987), p. 360.Google Scholar
20.Gaier, J. R., Lake, M. L., Moinuddin, A., and Marabito, M., Carbon 30, 345 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar