Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:38:31.833Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dislocation dynamics in Al–Mg–Zn alloys: A nuclear magnetic resonance and transmission electron microscopic study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

J. Th. M. De Hosson ,
O. Kanert ,
U. Schlagowski  and
G. Boom
J. Th. M. De Hosson
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Physics, Materials Science Centre, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 18, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands
O. Kanert
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, University of Dortmund, 46 Dortmund 50, Federal Republic of Germany
U. Schlagowski
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, University of Dortmund, 46 Dortmund 50, Federal Republic of Germany
G. Boom
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Physics, Materials Science Centre, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 18, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

Pulsed nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) proved to be a complementary new technique for the study of moving dislocations in Al–Mg–Zn alloys. The NMR technique, in combination with transmission electron microscopy (TEM), has been applied to study dislocation motion in Al–0.6 at. % Mg–1 at. % Zn and Al–2 at. % Mg–2.5 at. % Zn. Spin-lattice relaxation measurements clearly indicate that fluctuations in the nuclear quadrupolar interactions caused by moving dislocations in Al–Mg–Zn are different compared to those in ultra pure Al. From the motion induced part of the spin-lattice relaxation rate the mean jump distance of mobile dislocations has been determined as a function of strain. From the NMR data it is concluded that moving dislocations advance over a number of solute atoms in these alloys as described by Mott-Nabarro's model. At large strains there exists a striking difference between the mean jump distances in Al–0.6 at. % Mg–1 at. % Zn and in Al–1.2 at. % Mg–2.5 at. % Zn. The latter is about five times smaller than the former one. This is consistent with TEM observations that show dislocation cell formation only in Al–0.6 at. % Mg-1 at. % Zn and the macroscopic stress-strain dependences of these alloys.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 3 , Issue 4 , August 1988 , pp. 645 - 650
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Orowan, E.Z. Phys. 89, 634 (1934).Google Scholar
2Hosson, J. Th. M. De, Kanert, O. and Sleeswyk, A. W. in Dislocations in Solids, edited by Nabarro, F. R. N. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1983), Vol. 6, Chap. 32, pp. 441–534.Google Scholar
3Tamler, H.Kanert, O.Alsem, W. H. M. and Hosson, J. Th. M. De, Acta Metall. 30, 1523 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Hackeloer, H. J.Kanert, O.Tamler, H. and Hosson, J. Th. M. De, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 54, 341 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Nabarro, F. R. N.The Physics of Metals II, Defects, edited by Hirsch, P. B. (Cambridge U.P., Cambridge, 1975), p. 152.Google Scholar
6Nabarro, F. R. N.Philos. Mag. 35, 613 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Nabarro, F. R. N.Dislocations and Properties of Real Materials (Institute of Metals, London, 1985), p. 152.Google Scholar
8Hosson, J. Th. M. De, Boom, G.Schlagowski, U. and Kanert, O.Acta Metall. 34, 1571 (1986).Google Scholar
9Schlagowski, U.Kanert, O.Hosson, J. Th. M. De, and Boom, G.Acta Metall. 36, 865 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Hirsch, P. B.Physics of Metals II, edited by Hirsch, P. B. (Cambridge U.P., Cambridge, 1975), p. 189.Google Scholar