Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T21:48:51.755Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The development of high fracture toughness YBa2Cu3O7−x/Ag composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2016

Long S. Yeou
Affiliation:
Texas Center for Superconductivity at theUniversity of Houston, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204-4792
Kenneth W. White
Affiliation:
Texas Center for Superconductivity at theUniversity of Houston, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204-4792
Get access

Abstract

Microstructural refinement of the YBa2Cu3O7−x/Ag superconductor composite has resulted in a fracture toughness of 3.6 MPa √ms, as measured by single edge notch beam fracture specimens. This represents the highest bulk fracture toughness value published to date for silver compositions near 20%. A combination of grain size and porosity refinement, in addition to control of silver morphology and distribution, permits the development of fracture toughness levels that compare favorably with many structural ceramics such as SiC and Al2O3.

Type
Communications
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Wu, M.K., Ashburn, J.R., Torng, C.J., Hor, P.H., Meng, R.L., Gao, L., Huang, Z.J., Huang, Y.Q., and Chu, C.W., Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 908 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Salama, K., Selvamanickam, V., Gao, L., and Sun, K., Appl. Phys. Lett. 54 (23), 2352 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Cook, R.F., Shaw, T.M., and Duncombe, P.R., Adv. Ceram. Mater. 2, No. 3B (1987).Google Scholar
4.Cook, F., Dinger, T.R., and Clarke, D.R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 51 (6), 10 08 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Evans, A.G. and Faber, K.T., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 67 (4), 225260 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Smith, D.S., Suasmoro, S., and Cault, C., J. Europ. Ceram. Soc. 5, 8185 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Becher, P.F., Hsueh, C-H., Angelini, P., and Tiegs, T.N., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 71 (12), 10501061 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Singh, J.P., Leu, H.J., Poeppel, R.B., VanVoorhees, E., Goudey, G.T., Winsley, K., and Shi, Donglu, J. Appl. Phys. 66 (7), 31543158 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Yeh, F. and White, K., J. Appl. Phys. Nov. 1991.Google Scholar
10.Goldshtein, P.V., Elashkin, M.V., Klimov, P.M., Mosolov, A.B., and Shalatin, V.P., Institute of Mechanical Problems of Academy Science of USSR. Iss. No. 433, 1990, Moscow, USSR (in Russian).Google Scholar
11.Grimes, R.E., Kelkar, G.P., Guazzone, L., and White, K.W., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73 (5), 13391404 (1990).Google Scholar
12.Jenkins, M.G., Kobayashi, A.S., White, K.W., and Bradt, R.C., Int. J. Fracture 34, 281295 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Hay, J. and White, K.W., submitted to J. Mater. Res.Google Scholar
14.White, K.W. and Pyzik, A., 14th Conf. on Composites and Advanced Ceramics, Cocoa Beach, FL, 01 14-17, 1990.Google Scholar
15.Metals Handbook (ASM, Metals Park, OH, 1979), Vol. 2.Google Scholar