Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:18:17.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Determination of the angles between the quasicrystal zone axes of the decagonal phase in Al–Mn alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

J. Mayer ,
A. Csanady  and
K. Urban
J. Mayer
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Metallforschung, Institut für Physik, Postfach 800665, D-7000 Stuttgart 80, Federal Republic of Germany
A. Csanady
Affiliation:
Hungalu, ALUTERV-FKI, P.O.B. 128, 1389 Budapest, Hungary
K. Urban
Affiliation:
Kernforschungsanlage Jülich, Institut für Festkörperforschung, Postfach 1913, D-5170 Jülich, Federal Republic of Germany
Get access

Abstract

The angles between the zone axes of decagonal quasicrystals in two different Al–Mn alloys have been studied by means of precision tilt experiments in a transmission electron microscope. The results confirm that a tenfold symmetry axis is present in the reciprocal lattice. The angles between the principal axes in the decagonal phase do not coincide with those between the corresponding axes in the icosahedral phase. The presence of this distortion is independent of quenching rate and size of the decagonal quasicrystals.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , January 1990 , pp. 57 - 61
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Guyot, P. and Audier, M., Phil. Mag. B 52, L15 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 Elser, V. and Henley, C. C., Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2883 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Kuo, K. H., Ye, H. Q., and Li, D. X., J. Mater. Sci. 21, 2597 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Shoemaker, D. P. and Shoemaker, C. B., Mat. Sci. Forum 22–24, 67 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Bendersky, L. A., Mat. Sci. Forum 22–24, 151 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Bendersky, L. A., Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 1461 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 Chattophadhyay, K., Ranganathan, S., Subanna, G. N., and Thangaraj, N., Scripta Metall. 19, 767 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8 Fung, K. K., Yang, C.Y., Zhou, Y. Q., Zhao, J. G., Zhan, W. S., and Shen, B. G., Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 2060 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Thangaraj, N., Subanna, G. N., Ranganathan, S., and Chattophadhyay, K., J. of Microscopy 146, 287 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10 FitzGerald, J. D., Withers, R. L., Stewart, A. M., and Calka, A., Phil. Mag. B 58, 15 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11 Mayer, J., Thesis, University of Stuttgart, F.R.Germany (1988).Google Scholar
12 Cahn, J.W., Shechtman, D., and Gratias, D., J. Mater. Res. 1, 13 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13 Lueck, R., Mat. Sci. Forum 22–24, 231 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14 Mueller, S., Europhys. Lett. 3, 587 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15 Bancel, P. A. and Heiney, P. A., J. Phys. 47, C3–341 (1986).Google Scholar
16 Urban, K., Mayer, J., Rapp, M., Wilkens, M., Csanady, A., and Fidler, J., J. de Physique 47, C3–465 (1986).Google Scholar