Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T23:23:53.566Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Densification kinetics and modeling of glass-filled alumina composite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

Jau-Ho Jean
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, Republic of China
Tapan K. Gupta
Affiliation:
Alcoa, Alcoa Center, Pennsylvania 15069
Get access

Abstract

Kinetics and mechanism of sintering in a model borosilicate glass (BSG) + alumina composite system have been investigated isothermally at 600 to 1000 °C. A faster and greater densification is observed with higher sintering temperature, greater BSG content, and larger alumina particle size. Using measurable densification kinetics, it is found that the activation energy of densification (Q) increases continuously with increasing BSG content, from predominant <110 kJ/mol for BSG < 40 vol.% to 245 kJ/mol for BSG ≥ 90 vol.%. The rate-limiting step during densification is identified to be diffusion of alkali ions in BSG when BSG < 40 vol.% (Q = 110–170 kJ/mol), diffusion of both alkali and aluminum ions when BSG = 40–60 vol.% (Q = 110–170 kJ/mol), diffusion of aluminum ion in BSG when BSG = 60–80 vol.% (Q = 170 kJ/mol), and viscous flow of BSG when BSG ≥ 90 vol.% (Q = 245 kJ/mol). These observations are attributed to a chemical reaction taking place at the interface of alumina/BSG, resulting in a reaction layer adjacent to alumina. Since the composition of the reaction layer is known to be rich in aluminum and alkali ions and poor in silicon, the alkali ions content in BSG is continuously decreased during sintering. Accordingly, when the BSG content in the mixture is low, the resultant loss of alkali ions from BSG causes a rise in viscosity of BSG, thus slowing down the densification kinetics and changing the densification mechanism. As the amount of BSG is increased to ≥90 vol.% at the expense of alumina, the reaction as described above becomes less dominant and the sintering proceeds by viscous flow of glass.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Jean, J-H. and Gupta, T.K., J. Mater. Res. 7, 2514 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Jean, J-H. and Gupta, T. K., J. Mater. Res. 9, 486 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Jean, J-H. and Gupta, T. K., J. Mater. Sci. 27, 1575 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Jean, J-H. and Gupta, T. K., unpublished.Google Scholar
5Jean, J-H. and Gupta, T. K., J. Mater. Sci. 27, 4967 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Jean, J-H. and Gupta, T. K., J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 11, 656 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Cannon, H. S. and Lennel, F. V., Proc. Plansee Semin., edited by Benesovsky, F. (Metallwerk Plansee, Reutte, 1953), p. 106.Google Scholar
8Jean, J-H. and Lin, C.H., J. Mater. Sci. 24, 500 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9German, R. M., Liquid Phase Sintering (Plenum Press, New York, 1985), Chap. 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Kingery, W. D., J. Appl. Phys. 30, 301 (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Frischat, G. H., Ionic Diffusion in Oxide Glasses (Trans Tech, Bay Village, OH, 1975), p. 147.Google Scholar
12Frischat, G. H., Ionic Diffusion in Oxide Glasses (Trans Tech, Bay Village, OH, 1975), p. 138.Google Scholar
13Schaeffer, H. A., Phys. Status Solidi A 22, 281 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Haul, R. and Dumbgen, G., Z. Elektrochem. 66, 636 (1962); Hagel, W. C. and Mackenzie, J.D., Phys. Chem. Glasses 5, 113 (1964).Google Scholar
15Kwon, O-H. and Messing, G.L., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73, 275 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Kingery, W. D., Bowen, H. K., and Uhlmann, D. R., Introduction to Ceramics, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1976), Chap. 3.Google Scholar